• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Hampton Grange Nursing Home

48-50 Hampton Park Road, Hereford, Herefordshire, HR1 1TH (01432) 272418

Provided and run by:
Claridge Nursing Homes (Hampton Grange) Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

23 September 2014

During an inspection in response to concerns

Two inspectors carried out this inspection. We spoke with four people that lived at the home, five relatives, six staff, the registered manager and the provider. We also observed how staff cared for people, and we looked at four care plans to make sure that people had received the right care. The focus of the inspection was to answer five key questions: is the service safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led?

Below is a summary of what we found. The summary describes what people using the service, their relatives and the staff told us, what we observed and the records we looked at.

If you want to see the evidence that supports our summary please read the full report.

This is a summary of what we found:

Is the service safe?

People we spoke with told us that they felt their relatives were safe living at the home and their needs were met by staff that knew them. One staff member also told us that they felt people were safe and their needs were met.

CQC monitors the operation of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) which applies to care homes. We found that DoLS assessments for some people had been reviewed and there were proper policies and procedures in place. Relevant staff had been trained to understand when an application should be made and how to submit one.

Is the service effective?

We observed that people received appropriate care to meet their physical needs and maintain their comfort. All of the staff we spoke with told us about the individual needs of the people that used the service. People did not have to wait for help or support with their health care. This meant that people's needs could be met more effectively.

Is the service caring?

We observed that staff were kind and polite. We found that staff treated the people that lived there with dignity and respect. All the staff we spoke with were able to tell us about people's individual likes and dislikes. People's wishes had been respected. We saw where one person indicated they wanted to have their food in a particular area of the home and staff respected this.

Is the service responsive?

We found that the care records showed that people that lived at the home saw other professionals including physiotherapy, speech and language therapists and doctors when their health needs changed. The provider had acted appropriately to guidance from other professionals when people's needs changed. Relatives told us that they felt if people's needs changed the staff were always quick to respond and contact other professionals so that people's needs could continue to be met safely.

We found that there was an effective system in place to ensure that risks were identified and actioned appropriately. During this inspection we found that improvements had been made. The procedure had been improved and there were now further checks by the registered manager and clear actions had been taken when risks or improvements had been identified.

We found that there was a complaints system in place that ensured that people were listened to. We also saw that the provider encouraged feedback from families so that any concerns or comments could be actioned appropriately.

Is the service well led?

The provider had systems in place to effectively monitor the quality of the service. Regular audits and clear action plans showed that the provider had taken steps to ensure that the quality of the service was constantly being monitored and improved.

We found that staff felt that the management of the home was positive, and staff told us that they felt supported in their roles.

6 February 2014

During a routine inspection

During our inspection, we spoke with three people who used the service and two visitors. They told us they were happy with the care and treatment provided. One person told us, 'Everybody is very kind and I can't fault anyone'. We observed care practices and found that staff interactions were supportive and respectful.

People's needs were assessed and care and treatment was planned and delivered in line with their individual needs. The standard of record keeping in the home was good. This meant that people were protected from the risks of unsafe or inappropriate care and treatment.

There was a system in place for assessing and monitoring the quality of the service. This ensured people received a service which was of high quality and met their needs.

28 December 2012 and 3 January 2013

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We inspected on 28 December 2012 at 5am. This was because we had been told that staff might have been getting people up very early. We returned to the home on 3 January 2013 at 8.10am. This was so we could check how staff organised the start of the day for people.

We also needed to check that the provider had made improvements following our inspection in August 2012. We did this on 3 January 2013. During both visits we noted the staffing arrangements. This was because we had received information that there were sometimes not enough staff on duty.

We found no evidence at either visit that people were being woken or got up at an unreasonably early time. There were sufficient staff on duty during both of our visits. The relatives we spoke with told us that staff always came quickly when their parent used the call bell.

We spoke with four people who lived at the home and with a person's family. One person told us, 'they look after me so well here'. Another person said that they had never had any concerns and were 'very happy here'. We spoke with a health professional who gave us positive information about the home and how staff worked with them.

The care records contained clear information about people's care needs and showed that the staff arranged the health care people needed. Medicines were safely stored and the records were well maintained.

The manager and staff had worked hard to put right the concerns that we found in August 2012.

1 August 2012

During a routine inspection

We carried out an unannounced inspection of the home. We spent time in some of the communal areas of the home, such as the lounge, so that we could see how staff supported people. We also spoke with five people living at the home, two relatives who were visiting, and staff, including the manager. We looked in detail at the care records for three people.

People living at the home were very positive about the staff. One person said 'they couldn't be better' and another told us 'I couldn't be looked after better if I was the Queen'. We saw that staff were kind and caring in the way they supported people. We saw that staff were attentive to people's needs and took time to chat with people.

Some of the care records did not contain accurate or consistent information about people's care needs. We found that the care plans did not have enough information in them about how staff should handle and administer medicines. We found a number of discrepancies with the medicine administration records.

People told us that there were enough staff available to meet their needs. We saw that staff were busy but that people did not have to wait for assistance. Staff were cheerful and took time to make sure people had all they needed.

The manager told us that people living at the home and their families were sent satisfaction surveys every six months. The results of these surveys were analysed and presented at a meeting. The most recent survey showed a high level of satisfaction.

We saw evidence that senior staff from the provider's other nursing home had been carrying out audits of the service provided at Hampton Grange. These audits had not identified the shortcomings which we found. Therefore the systems for monitoring the quality of the service were not effective.