• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Helpful Home Care LTD

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Suite 9, 25 New Street, Oadby, Leicester, LE2 5EB (0116) 442 2181

Provided and run by:
Helpful Home Care Limited

Important: This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

About the service

Helpful Home Care LTD is a domiciliary care agency providing personal care, to adults in their own homes in the community. The Care Quality Commission (CQC) only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks relating to personal hygiene and eating. Where this is the case, we also consider any wider social care provided.

Who the service is for

Helpful Home Care LTD provides care at home to older and younger adults, including people with physical disabilities, people living with dementia, mental health needs, sensory impairment and learning disabilities living in their own homes.At the time of our assessment, 15 people were using the service.

Key findings

We carried out this assessment on 25 to 28 August 2026. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed autistic people and people with a learning disabilityrespect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.At the time of the assessment, the service was not supporting any people with a learning disability, but the providerhad regard to ‘Right support, right care, right culture’.

The provider demonstrated a positive learning culture, where safeguarding concerns were recognised and acted upon appropriately. Staff had received safeguarding training and were able to clearly describe their safeguarding responsibilities, including recognising signs of abuse and how to report and escalate concerns to help keep people safe.

Risks to people's health, safety and wellbeing were assessed and managed effectively, while supporting people to maintain as much independence and choice as possible. Medicines were managed safely.

The provider ensured there were sufficient numbers of appropriately skilled, experienced and trained staff to meet people's needs. Staff received induction, training, supervision and ongoing support to carry out their roles effectively. Recruitment processes were robust and helped ensure only suitable staff were employed.

People's needs were assessed before care commenced, and care was delivered in line with current good practice guidance. Staff worked closely with healthcare professionals and were kept informed of changes to people's needs. One staff member told us, "When there’s changes to people's needs we are informed straight away. For example, as soon as a doctor has spoken to the office staff, care staff are told right away."

Systems were in place to monitor people's outcomes and ensure care remained effective. Staff sought people's consent and respected their rights when providing support. They demonstrated a commitment to promoting people's choice and independence. They described supporting people to make informed decisions by providing options, explaining the potential benefits of different choices and respecting people's preferences about how their care was delivered.

People were treated with kindness, compassion and dignity. Feedback consistently demonstrated positive relationships between staff and the people they supported. One staff member told us, "The bond we've created with service users; it's easy to help them." Care was person-centred and reflected people's preferences and routines. The provider regularly sought feedback from people and acted upon it to improve the service.

The provider demonstrated strong leadership and a positive culture. Staff were proud of the organisation and spoke highly of the management team. One staff member said, "We are a bespoke company for local people using local staff. I am proud to work for Helpful Homecare." Staff felt valued and supported, with another commenting, "Managers welcome feedback. In supervision with [manager], I was given positive feedback about me."

Governance arrangements were effective in maintaining oversight of the service and driving continuous improvement. The provider was committed to learning, innovation and delivering high-quality care that achieved positive outcomes for people.

14 June 2019

During a routine inspection

About the service

Helpful Home Care LTD is a domiciliary agency that provides care and support to people living in their own accommodation. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and nutrition. Where they do we also consider any wider social care provided. At the time of this inspection the service was supporting 19 people with personal care.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

The service was small and personalised. The registered manager knew all the people using the service and their relatives and was in regular contact with them, to ensure they were satisfied with the care and support provided. People told us the service achieved excellent outcomes for them. The staff were happy working at the service and the registered manager was supportive of them.

People were safe using the service as the staff were competent and well-trained. Staff knew what to do to keep people safe and reduce risk to them. They assisted people with their medicines to ensure they had them safely and on time. They understood infection control and used aprons and gloves when assisting people.

Managers met and assessed people before they used the service to ensure their needs could be met. Staff ensured people had access to healthcare services and were trained in medical emergencies and first aid. They supported some people to eat and drink. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

The staff were kind, caring and compassionate. People had regular care workers who they got to know well. Staff communicated well with people’s families and representatives and let them know how people were getting on and if there were any concerns about them. Staff respected people’s privacy and dignity and were respectful and polite.

People’s calls were on time and care workers ensured people’s needs were met in the way they wanted. The multilingual staff team catered for people from different cultural backgrounds and understood how best to communicate with them. Information was available to people in accessible formats, for example large print.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

The last inspection of this service was carried out on 19 October 2016 and the rating was Good.

Why we inspected

This was a planned inspection based on the previous rating.

Follow up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.

19 October 2016

During a routine inspection

This announced inspection was carried out on 19 October 2016. The office is situated in Oadby Leicestershire and the service provides personal care to people living in their own home. This is a small service and at the time of our inspection 10 people were receiving care and support.

The service had a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People told us that they felt safe when staff supported them and that there were enough staff to meet their needs.

Risk assessments were in place which set out how to support people in a safe manner. The service had safeguarding and whistleblowing procedures in place. Staff were aware of their responsibilities in these areas.

People were supported by a consistent group of staff who had the skills they needed to meet people's needs and individualpreferences. People received any support they required to take their prescribed medicines safely when they needed to.

When people started to use the service a care plan was developed that included information about their support needs, likes, dislikes and preferences. This meant that staff had the relevant information to meet people’s needs.

People were supported by staff who had been given sufficient training to provide them with the knowledge and skills to provide appropriate care and support.

The Care Quality Commission (CQC) monitors the use of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS). The provider was aware of the principles of the MCA and how this might affect the care they provided to people. People were asked to provide their consent to the care being provided.

People received the assistance they required to have enough to eat and drink and people were supported to make appropriate referrals to health care professionals

when needed.

People were able to express their views on their care and were treated as they wished to be in a respectful manner. People who used the service, or their representatives, were encouraged to contribute to the planning of their care.

People who used the service, or their representatives, were encouraged to be involved in decisions and systems were in place to monitor the quality of service provision. People also felt they could report any concerns to the management team and felt they would be taken seriously.