26 November 2012
During a routine inspection
People had their interests protected where they lacked capacity to give their consent because the provider acted in accordance with legal requirements to protect them.
People told us staff were 'good' and 'helpful'. People were vague about being involved in the planning of their care. One person said they could not remember discussing their care with staff, but that didn't matter as they had all the help they needed.
We found the service took a holistic approach to people's care as two people had their pets with them. One person had a dog staying on a temporary basis until proper arrangements were made for its long term care. It was popular with some of the people living in the home. We observed them interacting with it by talking and providing little treats.
People who use the service benefit from staff who have been subject to the necessary character checks to ensure they are fit, trustworthy, qualified and are physically and mentally fit to do their job.