• Care Home
  • Care home

Beach Road

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

61 Beach Road, Littlehampton, West Sussex, BN17 5JH (01903) 730120

Provided and run by:
Consensus Support Services Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile

Assessment report published 8 June 2026

On this page

Well-led

Good

21 May 2026

Well-led – this means we looked for evidence that service leadership, management and governance assured high-quality, person-centred care; supported learning and innovation; and promoted an open, fair culture. This is the first assessment for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. This meant the service was consistently managed and well-led. Leaders and the culture they created promoted high-quality, person-centred care.
 

This service scored 75 (out of 100) for this area. Find out what we look at when we assess this area and How we calculate these scores.

Shared direction and culture

Score: 3

The provider had a shared vision, strategy and culture. This was based on transparency, equity, equality and human rights, diversity and inclusion, engagement, and understanding challenges and the needs of people and their communities.

Professionals, staff, and relatives commented on the positive values of managers and staff. We found the values of the organisation were clear and put people at the centre of the support and care. One staff member told us the organisation had, “Consistent values of kindness and respect.” Throughout the induction of new staff, the values were repeated Staff consistently described shared values that guided their practice and decision‑making. The emphasis on promoting independence, choice and dignity were clear in all staff training and followed through in supervisions and practice support.

Systems and processes including meetings and staff supervisions promoted a listening culture and equality, and diversity were recognised and supported.
 

Capable, compassionate and inclusive leaders

Score: 3

The provider had inclusive leaders at all levels who understood the context in which they delivered care, treatment and support and embodied the culture and values of their workforce and organisation. Leaders had the skills, knowledge, experience and credibility to lead effectively. They did so with integrity, openness and honesty.

People benefited from the support of leaders who were visible in the service and modelled inclusive behaviours. Staff told us they were able to talk with the registered manager when they needed to. One staff member said the registered manager was, “Open, friendly and easily approachable about anything important and they take time to explore issues.” We saw the registered manager leading by example and saw friendly and familiar interactions between them and staff. Managers and staff were clear about their duty of candour, to be transparent and open when things go wrong.

The registered manager and provider understood their responsibilities in relation to their registration with CQC. The provider had invested in learning opportunities for the managers, and this had a direct and positive effect on the service delivery.
 

Freedom to speak up

Score: 3

The provider fostered a positive culture where people felt they could speak up and their voice would be heard.

Staff were proud of the service; this was reflected in staff surveys. Staff said they felt able to raise anything with the provider and felt they would be listened to. One staff member said, “The manager is very approachable.” This openness supported safe care and reduced the risk of concerns going unreported. Staff demonstrated understanding of safeguarding processes and were clear about their responsibilities to report concerns. Leaders reinforced the importance of accurate reporting and escalation when needed, which supported a culture of transparency and accountability.

The provider had a easy read complaints procedure and communication and collaboration with relatives was frequent. The management team ensured everyone was treated fairly and were not discriminated against due to any protected characteristics.

There were processes in place to support staff to speak up, such as a whistle blowing policy and information containing contact details of the local authority and CQC. Staff confirmed they had access to the information.
 

Workforce equality, diversity and inclusion

Score: 3

The provider valued diversity in their workforce. They worked towards an inclusive and fair culture by improving equality and equity for people who worked for them.

Staff commented on the positive values of the registered manager and provider. One staff member said of the registered manager, “I feel supported 100% the manager and [name of another staff] are stars. No doubts no concerns.” Another said, “Registered manager is good, fair and always here for the people and staff, I like the company too.”

Systems and processes including meetings and staff supervisions promoted a listening culture and equality, and diversity were recognised and supported.
 

Governance, management and sustainability

Score: 3

The provider had clear responsibilities, roles, systems of accountability and good governance. They used these to manage and deliver good quality, sustainable care, treatment and support. They acted on the best information about risk, performance and outcomes, and shared this securely with others when appropriate.

Systems were in place to oversee care quality, including audits, incident reporting and action plans. Incidents were recorded and reviewed, with learning shared through staff meetings. Records showed lessons learned following medicines errors and environmental risks, with actions identified to reduce recurrence. Audits covered several topics including emergency planning, fire safety, and data protection as well as detailed monitoring of people support needs.

The management team worked together to ensure there was oversight and effective governance at the service. There were computerised systems and processes to assess, monitor and improve the quality and safety of the service provided. This included health and safety, accidents, incidents, complaints, medication management and staff documentation.
 

Partnerships and communities

Score: 3

The provider understood their duty to collaborate and work in partnership, so services worked seamlessly for people. They shared information and learning with partners and collaborated for improvement.

People received ongoing support from various external health and social care professionals who represented them. Staff and leaders understood their responsibilities to work in partnerships with external care professionals to ensure people received joined up care.

A professional told us, “The staff have demonstrated a high degree of professionalism and empathy, in what can often be a challenging environment. If I ever required assistance, it has been readily given.”

People were supported to access community activities that mattered to them, such as social events and voluntary activities. This enabled people to remain connected to their community.
 

Learning, improvement and innovation

Score: 3

The provider focused on continuous learning, innovation and improvement across the organisation and local system. They encouraged creative ways of delivering equality of experience, outcome and quality of life for people. They actively contributed to safe, effective practice and research.

The registered manager described how lessons learned from audits were used to improve people’s care and support. They explained, “From auditing a person’s daily records we saw a pattern of behaviours which we referred to our PBS team, there followed an assessment an appointment with a health professional and a mental capacity assessment and a best interest decision.” This demonstrated an ongoing commitment to reviewing practice and taking appropriate action to enhance the quality of support people received.

We saw action plans from the area director’s regular audits with dates for completion. One audit included comment identifying a person had two communication plans in their support plan and there were slight differences, the action plan showed this was quickly addressed.

We also saw information demonstrating the provider shares lessons learnt from their other services and the wider sector to raise awareness across their managers and staff.
This demonstrated the provider and managers commitment to continued improvement and learning.