You are here

This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile

Reports


Inspection carried out on 8 January 2019

During a routine inspection

About the service: Unicare Devon is a domiciliary care agency that was providing personal care to 77 people at the time of the inspection. It supports people with different needs and backgrounds including people with mobility, learning, or sensory support needs, and older people with dementia. Unicare Devon also provides enabling and support services to people in the Newton Abbott area these activities are not regulated and so we did not inspect this side of the service.

People’s experience of using this service:

Risks associated with people’s care needs were not always appropriately assessed and risks that staff may have faced were not documented.

The service did not have up to date assessments of care needs and information for staff on how to provide support to people using the service.

Quality assurance systems to assess, monitor and improve the quality and safety of the service were not in place.

Some care files lacked personalised information on how people wanted to have their care delivered. Staff knew people well and reflected what people told us about themselves.

Information was available to people in accessible formats if they needed it. The service treated people with dignity and respect and staff had training in equality and diversity.

People told us that occasionally staff were late but they stayed for the duration of the visit and met their needs.

The service had a caring, person centred ethos, there were several examples where staff had gone over and above what had been expected of them. People and relatives told us staff were kind and caring.

People were offered choice, in how they had their personal care delivered, what food staff prepared for them and what clothes they wore.

People were supported by staff who had been through a robust recruitment process that checked they were safe to work with people who may be vulnerable.

Staff and the registered manager knew how to spot signs of abuse and how to report them. Staff had attended safeguarding adults training.

Staff felt supported by the registered manager and listened to when they gave feedback.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practise. People told us staff asked them for consent before supporting with care tasks.

We found the service was in breach of two regulations relating to safe care and treatment and good governance.

Further information is in the detailed findings below.

Rating at last inspection: Unicare Devon was rated good at its last inspection on 14 July 2016, the report was published on 3 August 2016.

Why we inspected: This was a scheduled inspection based on the previous rating.

Follow up: We will ask the provider to send a report of actions to us within a specific timeframe relating to the breaches of regulation we have identified in this report. We will continue to monitor the intelligence we receive about the service, and invite the provider and registered manager to meet with us regarding how they plan to make improvements to the service.

Inspection carried out on 14 July 2016

During a routine inspection

Unicare Devon provides care and support to mostly older people, who live in their own homes. The services provided include personal care and domestic work for people living in Newton Abbot, Teignmouth, Dawlish and the surrounding areas.

The service had a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are 'registered persons'. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

We visited the office on 14 July 2016. We carried out phone calls to people and their relatives on 18 July 2016. We carried out a home visit on 19 July 2016. At the time of this announced inspection 78 people were receiving personal care from the service. The service had moved offices and this was the first inspection at this location.

People were really pleased with the way staff treated them. Each person we spoke with told us their care workers were kind, caring and compassionate. Comments included “I’m so glad I decided to have care; I’m delighted with them. I have a whole new group of friends”; “The staff are marvellous” and “They’re very helpful and kind, I only have to ask”. Several relatives told us that staff always offered to help them as well. Staff spoke about the people they cared for with compassion and concern. People told us staff were respectful and polite. We saw staff and people interact in a friendly way. People were pleased to see the staff. The staff knew people well and chatted with them with warmth. Staff checked if they could do anything else for people before leaving.

People told us they felt safe and comfortable when staff were in their home and when they received care. People told us "I feel very safe” and “I feel comfortable with them". Staff knew how to recognise signs of potential abuse and understood how to report any concerns in line with the service's safeguarding policy. Safe staff recruitment procedures were in place. This helped reduce the risk of the provider employing a person who may be a risk to vulnerable people.

People told us staff knew how to meet their needs. Comments included "They know my routine” and “They are competent”. Staff told us they were happy with the training they received. Staff told us they felt well supported and had regular opportunities to discuss their work.

Care plans were developed with each person. They described the support the person

needed to manage their day to day health needs. Staff knew people well and were able to tell us how they supported people. We saw staff responded to people's requests, met their needs appropriately, and knew how they liked things to be done.

People told us staff were usually on time and had time to meet their needs in the way they wanted. People were provided with a copy of the staff rota so they knew who was due to visit them. The registered manager told us they tried to ring people with any changes, and the majority of people confirmed this happened. Staff told us they had enough time to travel between visits.

Risk assessments had been undertaken for each person. These included information about action to be taken to minimise the chance of harm occurring to people. We saw risk assessments had been carried out in relation to nutrition, skin care, and mobility. Risk assessments relating to each person's home environment had been completed. Where concerns were identified, action had been taken. A healthcare professional fed back that the care staff had managed one person’s complex needs very well and this had reduced risks for them. The service reviewed incidents and accidents to minimise the risk of them happening again.

People were supported safely with their medicines and told us they were happy with the support they received. Staff completed medication administration record (MAR) sheets after giving people their