• Dentist
  • Dentist

Archived: Tamworth Dental Practice Partnership

25 Albert Road, Tamworth, Staffordshire, B79 7JS (01827) 62152

Provided and run by:
Tamworth Dental Practice Partnership

Important: The partners registered to provide this service have changed. See old profile

All Inspections

12 May 2021

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out this announced inspection on 12 May 2021 under section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a Care Quality Commission, (CQC), inspector who was supported by an additional CQC inspector and a specialist dental adviser.

As part of this inspection we asked:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Tamworth Dental Practice Partnership is in Tamworth, Staffordshire and provides NHS and private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

There was ramped access to the rear of the practice for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. At the time of our inspection the practice was undergoing a large build project to enhance the facilities for patients, this has resulted in the wheelchair access being temporarily unavailable. Patients who require wheelchair access are signposted to a local sister practice that is fully accessible. Car parking spaces, including dedicated parking for people with disabilities, are available in a pay and display car park opposite the practice. The railway station is less than a five-minute walk from the practice.

The dental team includes 10 dentists, nine dental nurses (seven of whom are trainee dental nurses), four receptionists and a practice manager. The practice has six treatment rooms.

The practice is owned by a partnership and as a condition of registration must have a person registered with the CQC as the registered manager. Registered managers have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

At the time of inspection there was no registered manager in post as required as a condition of registration. A registered manager is legally responsible for the delivery of services for which the practice is registered. A statutory notification advising of changes to a registered manager was submitted to CQC by the provider on the day of our inspection.

During the inspection we spoke with three dentists, three dental nurses (two of whom were trainees), two receptionists and the practice manager. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

Monday to Friday from 8am to 8pm

Saturday from 8am to 3pm

Our key findings were:

  • The practice was undergoing extensive renovations and building works at the time of our inspection. The provider had invested in a significant build project to expand services and facilities available to include improved access, additional waiting facilities, three additional treatment rooms, a treatment coordinator consultation room, a digital scanning room, a training suite and additional staff areas.

  • Comprehensive procedures had been implemented to reduce the spread of Covid 19.

  • Staff told us they felt involved and supported and worked as a team. At the time of our visit we were unable to review any appraisal documents due to many staff members being newly recruited and longer standing team members not receiving them due to the pandemic restrictions and priorities. The provider sent us a copy of their appraisal schedule within 48 hours of the inspection.

  • We identified several minor shortfalls during our inspection. However, the provider responded swiftly to these and following our inspection we were sent evidence to demonstrate that many of them had been addressed. This assured us that the provider took our concerns seriously. The provider must ensure that these improvements are embedded and sustained in the long term.

  • The provider had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance.

  • Staff knew how to deal with emergencies. Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were available.

  • The provider had systems to help them manage risk to patients and staff.

  • The provider had safeguarding processes and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding vulnerable adults and children.

  • The provider had staff recruitment procedures which reflected current legislation.

  • The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.

  • Staff provided preventive care and supported patients to ensure better oral health.

  • The provider had effective leadership and a culture of continuous improvement. However, at the time of our inspection the practice did not have a CQC registered manager, a statutory notification to notify CQC of a change to the registered manager was submitted during the inspection.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Take action to ensure the regulated activities at Tamworth Dental Practice Partnership are managed by an individual who is registered as a manager.

  • Develop systems to ensure an effective process is established for the on-going assessment, supervision and appraisal of all staff.

  • Improve the practice's protocols for medicines management and ensure all medicines are dispensed safely.

  • Implement audits for prescribing of antibiotic medicines taking into account the guidance provided by the Faculty of General Dental Practice.

15 February 2016

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection on 15 February 2016 to ask the practice the following key questions; Are services safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations

Are services effective?

We found that this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations

Are services caring?

We found that this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations

Are services responsive?

We found that this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations

Are services well-led?

We found that this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations

Background

Tamworth Dental Practice Partnership is a mixed dental practice providing NHS and private treatment for both adults and children. The practice is situated in a converted residential property. The practice had five dental treatment rooms and a separate decontamination room for cleaning, sterilising and packing dental instruments. Dental care was provided on two floors and had a reception and waiting area on the ground floor.

The practice was open 8.00am – 8.00pm Monday to Friday and Saturday 8.00am to 3.00pm. The practice has five dentists who are supported by six dental nurses, two receptionists and a practice manager and two area managers.

The practice manager is the registered manager. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the practice is run. The registered manager was supported in their role by two area managers.

Before the inspection we sent Care Quality Commission comment cards to the practice for patients to complete to tell us about their experience of the practice. We received feedback from 14 patients. These provided a positive view of the services the practice provides. Patients commented on the high quality of care provided by the dentists, the friendly nature of all staff and the cleanliness of the practice.

Our key findings were:

  • Staff had been trained to handle emergencies, appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment was readily available in accordance with current guidelines.
  • The practice appeared clean and well maintained.
  • Infection control procedures were robust and the practice followed published guidance.
  • The practice had a safeguarding lead with effective processes in place for safeguarding adults and children living in vulnerable circumstances.
  • Staff reported incidents and kept records of these which the practice used for shared learning.
  • Dentists provided dental care in accordance with current professional and National Institute for Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines
  • The service was aware of the needs of the local population and took these into account in how the practice was run.
  • Patients could access treatment as well as urgent and emergency care when required.
  • Staff recruitment files contained essential information in relation to Regulation 18, Schedule 3 of Health & Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2015.
  • Staff had received training appropriate to their roles and were supported in their continued professional development (CPD) by the practice manager.
  • Staff we spoke to felt supported by the practice manager and were committed to providing a quality service to their patients.
  • Information from 14 completed Care Quality Commission (CQC) comment cards gave us a positive picture of a friendly and professional service.
  • The practice manager provided effective leadership for staff working at the practice
  • The practice reviewed and dealt with complaints according to their practice policy

There were areas where the provider could make improvements and should:

  • Review the recommendations made by Radiation Protection Adviser with respect to the use of a rectangular collimator for each of the five intra-oral X-ray machines.
  • Make sure that risks in relation to fire safety are fully identified and mitigated.