• Hospital
  • Independent hospital

SpaMedica Manchester

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

City Gate Central, Blantyre Street, Manchester, Greater Manchester, M15 4SQ (0161) 838 0870

Provided and run by:
SpaMedica Ltd

Important: This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile

All Inspections

25 October 2019

During an inspection looking at part of the service

The service is registered to provide the following regulated activities:

  • Diagnostics and screening procedures
  • Surgical procedures
  • Treatment of disease, disorder or injury.

During the inspection, we visited outpatient and surgical areas. We spoke with 15 staff including registered nurses, health care technicians, reception staff, medical staff, and senior managers. We spoke with eight patients and six relatives. During our inspection, we reviewed five sets of patient records that covered cataract surgery, age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and YAG laser.

There were no special reviews or investigations of the hospital ongoing by the CQC at any time during the 12 months before this inspection. This service had been inspected following previous methodology.

Activity (July 2018 to June 2019)

  • In the reporting period July 2018 to June 2019 there were 3 702 visits in the operating theatre
  • There were 6 239 day case episodes of care recorded at the Hospital.
  • There were 6 863 outpatient total attendances in the reporting period.
  • All patients were NHS-funded.

There were a total of 17 surgeons who worked for the provider under practising privileges. Of these, seven had carried out between 10 and 99 episodes of care and 10 had carried out more than 100 episodes of care. There was one regular surgeon who worked at the location. The service employed 10 registered nurses, seven health care technicians, eight patient co-ordinators, as well as having its own bank staff. These were shared with another location that was buddied with them.

Track record on safety

  • There were no never events
  • There were a total of 40 clinical incidents of which 38 were classified as either no harm or low harm
  • Two incidents were classified as moderate harm
  • There were no serious injuries

There were no incidences of hospital acquired Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA),

There were no incidences of hospital acquired Meticillin-sensitive staphylococcus aureus (MSSA)

There were no incidences of hospital acquired Clostridium difficile (C.diff)

There were no incidences of hospital acquired E-Coli

There were 6 complaints

Services provided at the hospital under service level agreement:

  • Sterilisation
  • Decontamination
  • Out of hours call handlers
  • Pathology
  • Interpreter services
  • Cleaning
  • Clinical waste
  • Confidential waste
  • Pharmacy service

10 December 2013

During a routine inspection

The people who used the service told us they were very happy with the service they received. One person described the staff as 'excellent' and another person said the service as 'extremely good'. One person said, 'I really can't praise the staff enough.' Another person told us, 'I was fully satisfied with everything.' People we spoke with said the staff were polite and friendly and they were given information about their treatments prior to consent being sought.

People's case files identified the healthcare need to be treated and had detailed records regarding tests requested results and follow-on treatments. Records also showed that people's individual needs such as neck support when lying down were taken into consideration before beginning treatment. If requested people could be accompanied in theatre by a relative or friend.

There were arrangements in place to deal with foreseeable emergencies. The registered manager told us that all patients were given a 24 hour contact number following their treatment in case any complications arose.

People we spoke with told us that the clinic was always clean. One person told us; "The clinic and reception area was very clean, I didn't have any concerns about the cleanliness of the place.' The premises were clean, tidy and in an excellent state of repair throughout with appropriate floor and surface coverings.

The staff recruitment and selection processes appeared to be in line with good practice which meant the staff employed had relevant qualifications, knowledge, skills and experience to carry out their role.

The people who used the service told us that they were completely satisfied with the standard of cleanliness throughout the clinic and they knew who to contact if they wanted to make a complaint.

23 November 2012

During a routine inspection

The people who used the service told us they had been given detailed information about their treatments prior to consent being sought. They said they were completely satisfied with the care and treatment they received and the staff providing their care seemed to be knowledgeable and well trained. None of the people we spoke with had any concerns to raise about their safety and welfare. Some of their comments included:

'I was given a leaflet about the procedure I was having and it told me everything I needed to know. I also had an opportunity to ask questions during my first consultation.'

"The staff were excellent, I couldn't have asked for anything more. They were all very kind.'

'I would recommend Spamedica to anyone. The service was very well organised and I was very happy with everything.'