• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Connect House

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

Riber Crescent, Basford, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 1LP (0115) 924 5467

Provided and run by:
CityCare Connect Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

22 June 2017

During a routine inspection

We inspected Connect House on 22 and 23 June 2017. The inspection was unannounced. The service is a situated in Basford, Nottingham and is operated by CityCare Connect Limited. The service is registered to provide accommodation for a maximum of 56 people. Connect House is a fast paced service with one or two admissions and discharges a day. People tend to stay at the service of a period of around 6 weeks, although some people stay longer dependent upon their need for treatment and rehabilitation.

Connect House work closely with staff employed in CityCare partnership to provide a unique and innovative service where people are enabled to access expert support from a range of specialist health professionals. The service is split into two distinct units, Heritage Suite and Garden Suite.

Heritage Suite has been open since 2014 and provides a reablement service to people who have recently been discharged from hospital to help them regain their independence. Heritage Suite is supported by a range of health professionals including physiotherapists, occupational therapists and nurses. There are also five stroke beds in Heritage Suite dedicated to the care and rehabilitation of people who have experienced a stroke. During our inspection there were 27 people staying in Heritage Suite.

Garden Suite has been open since January 2016 and provides nursing care. Together with the hospitals they are piloting a healthcare of older people project aimed at facilitating discharge of people with complex health needs from hospital. Garden Suite is staffed by nurses who are on rotation from CityCare Partnership and health care assistants and is supported a range of visiting clinicians including GP's, consultants and specialist nurse practitioners. There are three beds on Garden Suite which are dedicated for the care of people who are coming towards the end of their lives. During our inspection there were 22 people staying in Garden Suite.

At the last inspection in September 2016 we found five breaches of the legal requirements of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014, these breaches were in relation to safe care and treatment, safeguarding service users from abuse and improper treatment meeting nutritional and hydration needs, consent and governance. We asked the provider to take action to make improvements to the quality and safety of the service and we received an action plan on 5 December 2016 which stated that all actions would be complete by 31 March 2017. During this inspection we found that improvements had been made but some improvements were still required, this resulted in us finding one ongoing breach of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 Regulations (2014). You can see what action we told the provider to take at the back of the full version of the report.

The service had a registered manager in place at the time of our inspection. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons.’ Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

The principles and application of the Mental Capacity Act were not always followed where people lacked capacity to make decisions for themselves. People were supported by staff who had not always received adequate training. Although staff felt supported they were not always provided with regular supervision. There were plans in place to make improvements in this area.

People’s medicines were not always stored or managed in a safe way. Improvements had been made to ensure that risks to people’s health and safety were managed appropriately and safely and further improvements were planned. There were enough staff to provide care and support to people when they needed it, however staff were not always deployed effectively to ensure the delivery of safe care and support.

The provider had made progress in developing systems and processes to monitor the quality and consistency of the service. However these were still not always effective at identifying the required improvements. There were processes in place to enable people and their relatives to provide feedback on the service. Staff felt supported in their roles and were confident to raise concerns or make suggestions about how to improve the service. The management team were responsive to feedback and swift action was taken to address some areas of concern raised during this inspection.

People told us they felt safe and they were supported by staff who knew how to recognise and report concerns about their safety. Safe recruitment practices were followed.

Improvements had been made to ensure people’s nutritional and hydration needs were met. People were offered a choice of freshly prepared, food and drink and were provided with assistance when required. People’s day to day health care needs were met and people had access to expert health professionals. This had a positive impact on people who used this service who were supported to be in the best possible health.

Where people had capacity they were encouraged to make decisions about their care and support, staff understood how people communicated and they were supported to maintain their independence. Staff understood the importance of treating people with kindness, dignity and respect and we observed this in practice. Staff also respected people’s right to privacy.

People told us they received the support they required and although care plans did not always contain adequate detail of the support people required there were other systems in place to ensure staff had access to this information. People had the opportunity to get involved in social activities and most people told us that they had enough to do with their time. Complaints were documented, investigated and action was taken to address concerns raised.

12 September 2016

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 12, 15, 16 and 19 September 2016, it was an unannounced inspection. Connect House is run by CityCare Connect Limited. The service is registered to provide accommodation for 56 people who require nursing or personal care. Connect House is situated in Basford in Nottingham.

Connect House is a wholly owned subsidiary organisation of CityCare Partnership and staff work closely with staff employed in CityCare partnership. The service is split into two distinct units, Heritage Suite and Garden Suite. Heritage Suite has been open since 2014 and provides a reablement service to people who have recently been discharged from hospital to help them regain their independence. Heritage Suite is supported by a range of health professionals including physiotherapists, occupational therapists and nurses. During our inspection there were 19 people in Heritage Suite.

Garden Suite has been open since January 2016 and provides nursing care for older people. Together with the hospitals they are piloting a healthcare of older people project aimed at facilitating discharge of people with complex health needs from hospital. Garden Suite is staffed by nurses who are on rotation from CityCare Partnership and health care assistants and is supported a range of visiting clinicians including GP's, Consultants and specialist nurse practitioners. During our inspection there were 25 people in Garden Suite.

When we last inspected the service on 28 May 2015, we found a breach of the legal requirement related to person centred care. We asked the provider to make improvements in this area and during this inspection we found that the required improvements had been made. We also received additional information of concern following our previous inspection. We undertook this comprehensive inspection to check whether or not the service now met legal requirements, to address the information of concern we had received and to provide a rating for the service.

The service provided by Connect House was innovative and pioneering and people were enabled to access expert support from a range of specialist health professionals. However when people had specific health conditions staff did not have access to clear information in care plans to enable effective support and monitoring.

People’s medicines were not managed or handled safely. Although people felt safe the service the risks associated with people’s care and support had not been identified or managed appropriately. Assessments had not been carried out in line with people's individual needs and people's care records did not contain sufficient guidance for staff to minimise risk.

Equipment used to support people was not always used safely. People were not supported to maintain adequate levels of hydration and nutrition and where people required specialist diets these were not always provided.

There were enough staff to provide care and support to people and staff understood their responsibility to protect people from the risk of abuse. However we found that people were supported by staff who had not received adequate training and we found that not all staff were provided with regular supervision and support.

People’s rights under the Mental Capacity Act (2005) were not respected. Where people had capacity they were not always effectively involved in day to day decisions. However people, and their families, were involved in aspects of care planning and had a good understanding of the purpose of the service.

End of life care was not provided in a dignified manner and people who used the service were not always spoken about in a respectful way. People did not always receive personalised care that met their needs because records were not tailored around individual needs and preferences.

Systems in place to monitor and improve the quality of the service were not effective which resulted in negative outcomes for people using the service. Staff did not always have a good understanding of their responsibilities.

People were enabled and encouraged to be as independent as possible. People were supported to maintain relationships with family and friends and were provided with the opportunity to get involved in activities. People’s right to privacy was respected.

The management team were open, approachable and responsive. Feedback was encouraged and people were supported to raise issues and concerns and there were systems in place to respond to concerns and complaints. People and staff were involved in giving their views on how the service was run.

We found multiple breaches of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. These breaches were in relation to safe care and treatment, consent, nutrition and hydration and good governance. You can see what action we told the provider to take at the back of the full version of the report.

28 May 2015

During a routine inspection

We inspected the service on 28 May 2015. This inspection was unannounced and was the first time we had inspected since the service was registered with us in November 2014.

Connect House is registered to provide short term assessment and rehabilitation for up to 28 older people who have been in hospital or living at home for example after a period of ill health or recovering from surgery. The service provides support and assessment for a few weeks until people’s level of independence is established.

The service is set in a large, light spacious modern building with car parking and an enclosed garden which is used by people who stay there. As the service was still developing there were a number of refurbishments ongoing and all of the building was not yet open. When we visited there were 14 people using the service.

The service had a registered manager in place at the time of our inspection. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons.’ Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People were not fully involved in the planning of their care and were not supported to have their say about the quality of the service. There were some quality assurance systems in place, but these did not cover all areas of the service so quality in these areas could not be assured.

People were protected from harm by staff who understood how to reduce risks and how to report and deal with any incidents. There were enough staff and they were trained to support people in the service.

People’s medicines were not always managed safely and improvements were still being established.

People were encouraged and supported to make their own decisions and to regain as much independence as possible. People enjoyed a healthy diet and had plenty to eat and drink.

People’s interests and activities were not always supported on a regular basis and people were not always sure how to give feedback or raise concerns with the provider.

People were treated by staff who knew them well with kindness and respect and relationships with family and friends were supported well.

You can see what action we told the provider to take at the back of the full version of the report.