• Care Home
  • Care home

Cocklebury Farmhouse

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Cocklebury Lane, Off Darcy Close, Chippenham, Wiltshire, SN15 3QW (01249) 658670

Provided and run by:
Cocklebury Farmhouse Homes Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed - see old profile

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Our current view of the service

Good

Updated 29 January 2026

Date of Assessment: 11, 12, 16 and 17 February 2026. Cocklebury Farmhouse is a care home service providing accommodation and personal care for adults with learning disabilities and autistic people. This inspection was carried out in response to the rating of requires improvement at the last inspection. At this inspection we found the provider had made improvements and was no longer in breach of regulations.

We expect health and social care providers to guarantee people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices and independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ is the guidance CQC follows to make assessments and judgements about services supporting people with a learning disability and autistic people and providers must have regard to it.

The provider had taken action to address all the shortfalls identified at the last inspection. The service now had effective systems to support people following incidents in which people were restrained for their safely. Incidents were clearly recorded and reviewed by managers to ensure any learning from incidents was implemented. The provider had successfully worked to reduce incidents where people were restrained. Water samples were now regularly tested to ensure Legionella was not present in the building.

People were now supported by staff who were competent, skilled and experienced. Staff had received effective training to help them support people. Managers now kept clear records of decision-making processes where people did not have capacity to consent to their care and treatment. Language used in incident reports and care records was now respectful and maintained people’s dignity. Information was now provided for people in formats which were more accessible for them, and staff were skilled in people’s communication methods. Members of the senior management team now demonstrated they had the skills, knowledge and experience to lead effectively. Governance systems were now effective in identifying shortfalls in the service and ensuring improvements were made.

Staffing levels enabled people to access their community. The service had effective systems to manage risks people experienced. People were supported to take their medicines safely. Staff received effective training and support to help them do their job well.

People had support plans which reflected their individual needs. The provider worked with health and social care professionals to ensure people had access to the care they needed. People were supported to identify their wishes for the future and plan out support they needed to achieve their goals. Feedback from professional partners was positive about the way the service worked with them to meet people’s needs.

People knew who the management team were and told us they felt able to raise concerns if needed. Staff said they could raise any concerns with the management team and were confident action would be taken as a result.

People's experience of the service

Updated 29 January 2026

People and their relatives were positive about the quality of their care and support. People said they felt safe living at the service and knew who they could talk to if they had any concerns. We observed that people were relaxed in the company of staff. People proudly showed round their home and records of activities they had taken part in. People told us staff were available to support them to do the things they wanted to.

Relatives told us the service had worked well to make people’s move to the service a success, with comments including, “We had lots of meetings with them before. [Person has] never looked back. They were excellent and carefully explained how things worked there.” Relatives said people received good support from knowledgeable staff who treated them as individuals. During the inspection we observed staff gaining people’s consent before providing any support and when planning what people wanted to do.

People told us they liked the staff. We observed people being treated with respect by staff who knew people’s needs. Relatives told us staff were kind, respectful and patient. Comments from relatives included, “The staff are kind and caring. They speak nicely to [person]”; “They are very kind and caring staff” and “[Person] is treated with dignity and respect.”

People showed us their support plans and said they had meetings with staff to plan what they wanted to do. People were supported to take part in a mixture of group and individual activities, depending on their wishes. One person told us they had been supported to plan holidays with a small group of friends, rather than a larger group which they had previously found difficult. Another person told us they had recently started to coach at their rugby club and said they were “really enjoying the challenge”.

Relatives felt the service was well managed. People knew staff and leaders and had developed strong relationships with them. We observed people interacting confidently with staff who demonstrated a good understanding of their needs, including how to communicate with them.