• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Comfort Call - Leeds

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

Ground Floor, 7 Victoria Court, Bank Square, Morley, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS27 9SE (0113) 252 2583

Provided and run by:
Comfort Call Limited

Important: This service is now registered at a different address - see new profile

All Inspections

17 May 2016

During a routine inspection

This was an announced inspection carried out on the 17 May 2016. At the last comprehensive inspection in October 2015 we rated the service as requires improvement. At that inspection we found two breaches of regulation; people were not protected against the risks associated with medicines because the provider did not have appropriate arrangements in place to manage medicines and there were not always effective systems in place to manage, monitor and improve the quality of the service provided.

After the inspection in October 2015, the provider wrote to us to say what they would do to meet the regulations in relation to each breach. They told us they would complete all actions by the end of January 2016. At this inspection, in May 2016, we found that the provider had not completed their plan of action and legal requirements were still not met. We also found additional breaches.

Comfort Call-Leeds is a domiciliary care agency which provides personal care to people living in their own homes in the Leeds and Kirklees area. At the time of the inspection there was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Medicines were not managed consistently and safely. Safe medicine administration practices were not followed so people were not protected against the risks of unsafe management of medicines. Although staff had received training in managing medicines, this had not given staff the required competency to manage medicines safely. People had not always received their medicines as prescribed, resulting in potential harm.

The provider’s systems to monitor and assess the quality of service provision were not effective. Actions that had been identified to improve the service were not always implemented and the provider’s quality monitoring systems had failed to identify significant concerns.

People did not always receive their care and support as planned as staff had missed some people’s calls and did not always spend the agreed time on the calls; cutting them short if they did not have enough time to get from one call to the next. Where people had regular care staff they spoke highly of them. However, people told us they did not have consistent staff at weekends and this meant they had calls from staff they were not familiar with and who did not know their needs.

There were not always effective systems in place to respond appropriately to complaints and comments made by people who used the service or people acting on their behalf. People who used the service were not confident that their comments and complaints were always listened to and dealt with effectively.

Staff training records showed staff had completed a range of training; however full records of induction training were not available to show this had been completed thoroughly. Staff knew what to do to make sure people were safeguarded from abuse and any risks were managed to ensure people’s safety.

Staff were able to demonstrate the different ways in which they helped to protect people’s privacy and dignity and could describe the individual needs of people who used the service.

We found a number of breaches of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) regulations 2014. You can see the action we have told the provider to take at the end of this report.

20 October 2015

During a routine inspection

This was an announced inspection carried out on the 20 October 2015. This was the first inspection of the service.

Comfort Call-Leeds is a domiciliary care agency which provides personal care to people living in their own homes in the Leeds and Kirklees area. Comfort Call-Leeds provides assistance and support to people to help them maintain and improve their independence.

At the time of the inspection, the service had a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) but they were no longer working for the agency. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run. A manager had been employed since July 2015 and had applied to register with CQC; however, at the time of our inspection they were working their notice.

We found people were not always protected against the risks associated with medicines because the provider did not have appropriate arrangements in place to manage medicines.

The provider’s quality assurance systems were not always effective to ensure identified actions were addressed to improve the service.

Overall, people we spoke with told us they were happy with the care they received from the service and that staff were trained to meet their needs. Some people who used the service told us they did not always receive consistent care workers and that they were sometimes late for their calls.

We found there were systems in place to protect people from the risk of harm and appropriate recruitment procedures were in place. There were policies and procedures in place in relation to the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and staff showed they understood how to ensure their practice was in line with the MCA.

Staff received support to help them understand how to deliver good care; they spoke highly of their training and induction. However, we noted that refresher training was needed for a number of staff in some topics. Staff said they received regular supervision of their work to ensure their practice was assessed.

People told us they got the support they needed with meals and healthcare.

People got opportunity to comment on the service and knew who to talk to if they wanted to discuss their care or raise a concern.

We found two breaches of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) regulations 2014. You can see the action we have told the provider to take at the end of this report.