• Doctor
  • GP practice

Anlaby Surgery

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Haltemprice Leisure Centre, Springfield Way, Anlaby, Hull, North Humberside, HU10 6QJ (01482) 658918

Provided and run by:
Dr Anthony Milner

Important: This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile

All Inspections

28 June 2023

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out an announced focused inspection at Anlaby Surgery between 26 – 28 June 2023. Overall, the practice is rated as Good.

Safe - Good

Effective - Good

Caring – Not inspected, rating of Good carried over from previous inspection

Responsive - Good

Well-led – Good

Following our previous inspection on 22 July 2022, the practice was rated requires improvement overall and for safe, effective and well-led. The practice was rated as good for caring and responsive.

The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Anlaby Surgery on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

Why we carried out this inspection

We carried out this inspection to follow up a breach of regulation from the previous inspection in July 2022 in line with our inspection priorities. We followed up on a previous breach relating to good governance.

How we carried out the inspection

This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site.

This included:

  • Conducting staff interviews using video conferencing.
  • Completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system (this was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements).
  • Reviewing patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider.
  • Requesting evidence from the provider.
  • A short site visit.
  • Staff questionnaires.

Our findings

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We found that:

  • The practice provided care in a way that kept patients safe and protected them from avoidable harm.
  • The practice had significantly improved their governance around safeguarding systems and processes.
  • Patients received effective care and treatment that met their needs.
  • The practice had made significant improvements monitoring and reviewing patients prescribed direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) medicine.
  • Staff dealt with patients with kindness and respect and involved them in decisions about their care.
  • The practice had an efficient and effective appointments system which meant patients could easily access care and treatment in a timely way that was convenient for them.
  • Results from the National GP Patient Survey were significantly higher for the practice than national and local averages in regard to how easy it was to speak to someone at the practice and about making an appointment.
  • Governance structures were fully embedded. The provider had a wider oversight of the running of the practice as a result.
  • The way the practice was led and managed promoted the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care.

Whilst we found no breaches of regulations, the provider should:

  • Ensure that all staff complete their mandatory training as planned
  • Formally monitor the competence of non-medical prescribers
  • Continue to develop systems for reviewing medicines alerts
  • Ensure all staff have an awareness of the Freedom to Speak Up Guardian
  • Engage with their practice population and form a Patient Participation Group

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA

Chief Inspector of Health Care

22 July 2022

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out an announced inspection at Anlaby Surgery on 19th – 22nd July 2022. Overall, the practice is rated as Requires Improvement.

Safe - Requires Improvement

Effective – Requires Improvement

Caring – Not Rated

Responsive – Not Rated

Well-led – Requires Improvement

Following our previous inspection on 28th June 2016, the practice was rated Good overall and for all key questions:

The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Anlaby Surgery on our website at www.cqc.org.uk

Why we carried out this inspection

We carried out this inspection as part of our direct monitoring intelligence system Band 1 sampling exercise. This exercise is looking at a percentage of band 1 locations in each sector with published statements on our website as part of our quality assurance process to monitor the effectiveness of our new monitoring approach. We need assurance that Good or Outstanding rated locations are still good or outstanding and that we were right to publish the public statement.

How we carried out the inspection/review

Throughout the pandemic CQC has continued to regulate and respond to risk. However, taking into account the circumstances arising as a result of the pandemic, and in order to reduce risk, we have conducted our inspections differently.

This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site. This was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements.

This included:

  • Conducting staff interviews using video conferencing
  • Completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system and discussing findings with the provider
  • Reviewing patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider
  • Requesting evidence from the provider
  • A short site visit

Our findings

We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:

  • what we found when we inspected
  • information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
  • information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.

We have rated this practice as Requires Improvement overall

We found that:

  • Staff dealt with patients with kindness and respect and involved them in decisions about their care.
  • The practice adjusted how it delivered services to meet the needs of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients could access care and treatment in a timely way.
  • Recently senior leaders at the practice had changed and the new leadership team were making progress to the running of the practice.
  • Staff reported that since the change of management the culture of the practice had improved.
  • The practice did not have any formal safeguarding meetings only informal discussions
  • The practice did not have any risk assessments for emergency drugs
  • Systems for managing and reviewing patients with long term conditions were not effective. The majority of patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) medication had not had the required monitoring.
  • The practice did not have a clear protocol for dealing with Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) alerts
  • There was no clear governance structure which meant systems were sometimes not reviewed
  • The practice’s goverance and assurance systems were weak.

We found a breach of regulations. The provider must:

  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care

Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.

Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA

Chief Inspector of Hospitals and Interim Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services

21 & 22 March 2016

During a routine inspection

Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at Anlaby Surgery on 21 & 22 March 2016. The practice is rated as good.

Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows;

  • There was an open and transparent approach to safety and an effective system in place for reporting and recording significant events.
  • Risks to patients were assessed and well managed.
  • Staff assessed patients’ needs and delivered care in line with current evidence based guidance.
  • Staff had the skills, knowledge and experience to deliver effective care and treatment.
  • Patients said they were treated with compassion, dignity and respect and they were involved in their care and decisions about their treatment.
  • Information about services and how to complain was available and easy to understand. Improvements were made to the quality of care as a result of complaints and concerns.
  • Patients said they were able to get same day appointments and make appointments up to four weeks in advance.
  • The practice had good facilities and was well equipped to treat patients and meet their needs.
  • There was a clear leadership structure and staff felt supported by management. The practice proactively sought feedback from staff and patients, which it acted on.
  • The practice moved to a new purpose built surgery in 2014 within the Haltemprice leisure centre complex. Alongside the practice were a range of services including a library, council offices, swimming pool, exercise facilities and a café. This was a unique collaboration with the East Riding Council and demonstrated a joint approach to accessing and delivering health and social care services under one roof for the benefit of the local population.
  • The provider was aware of and complied with the requirements of the Duty of Candour.

However there were areas of practice where the provider needs to make improvements.

Importantly the provider should:

  • Ensure there is an audit trail of blank prescriptions forms.

  • Implement a planned audit programme to increase the number of audits undertaken.

  • Ensure all staff are up to date with mandatory training.

  • Ensure the practice has a written strategy and supporting business plan which outlines their vision and plans for the future.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) 

Chief Inspector of General Practice