• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Conrad Court

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

1-78 Conrad Court, Cary Avenue, London, SE16 7EJ (020) 3815 2105

Provided and run by:
Notting Hill Housing Trust

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

20 June 2017

During a routine inspection

Conrad Court provides personal care for people living in self-contained flats. At the time of the inspection the service was supporting 42 older people, people with mental health needs and people with a learning disability.

At our last inspection in May 2015 the service was rated as 'Good’. At this inspection we found the service remained rated as ‘Good’.

The service had a registered manager in post at the time of the inspection. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People remained safe. Staff continued to protect people from abuse and managed identified risks . There were staff in sufficient numbers to keep people safe and they had been recruited by the provider using robust procedures to ensure they were appropriate to deliver care.

People continued to be supported by trained and supervised staff. People were treated in accordance with the Mental Capacity Act 2005. People were supported to eat healthily and to access the services of health and social care professionals whenever they needed to.

People told us the staff continued to be caring and treated them with respect. People were supported to maintain relationships and their independence. Staff respected people’s privacy and provided people with information about the service.

People continued to receive a service that was responsive to their assessed and changing needs. People were supported to remain active and to avoid social isolation. The provider gathered people’s views to improve the service and responded promptly and appropriately to people’s complaints.

The service continued to be well led. People and staff thought the registered manager was approachable and open. The service had robust quality assurance processes in place and the provider worked collaboratively with others to achieve positive outcomes for people.

30 April & 13 May 2015

During a routine inspection

Conrad Court is an extra care service for up to 52 people living in purpose built flats. Care is provided by Notting Hill Housing Trust. There were 22 people using the service at the second day of our visit.

The inspection took place on 30 April and 13 May 2015 and was unannounced. This was the first inspection that had taken place since the service was registered on 5 September 2014.

There was a registered manager at the service. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

The service had good arrangements to ensure people’s safety. Staff were aware of safeguarding issues and procedures. People were protected from the risks associated with medicines because staff were trained and competent to assist them properly.

People received care from staff who were recruited safely. Staff were checked to make sure they were suitable to work with people using the service before they began their job. There were enough staff available to meet people’s needs.

Staff were supported and trained to meet people’s needs effectively. When appropriate there was contact between care staff and health and social care professionals to ensure important information was passed on to meet people’s needs.

People found staff helpful and caring. They said staff treated them with dignity. Staff encouraged people, as far as possible, to maintain their independence. The service was responsive to people’s individual needs and choices.

The provider had systems in place to assess and monitor the quality of the service. People had a chance to say what they thought about the service and the feedback gave the provider an opportunity for improvement.