Updated 30 May 2017
We carried out this announced inspection on 5 May 2017 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.
We told the NHS England area team and Healthwatch that we were inspecting the practice. They did not provide any information of concern.
To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following five questions:
• Is it safe?
• Is it effective?
• Is it caring?
• Is it responsive to people’s needs?
• Is it well-led?
These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.
Our findings were:
Are services safe?
We found that this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.
Are services effective?
We found that this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.
Are services caring?
We found that this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.
Are services responsive?
We found that this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.
Are services well-led?
We found that this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.
Background
372 Dental is in Bolton and provides NHS treatment to children and private treatment to patients of all ages.
The practice is located in a converted terraced property. There is access for people who use wheelchairs and pushchairs. The toilet is not accessible to wheelchair users, plans are in place to improve access. On street parking is available near the practice.
The dental team includes two dentists, four dental nurses, two part time dental hygienists, a receptionist and a practice manager. The practice has three treatment rooms which are all on the ground floor.
The practice is owned by a partnership and as a condition of registration must have a person registered with the Care Quality Commission as the registered manager. Registered managers have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run. The registered manager at 372 Dental was one of the partners.
On the day of inspection we collected two CQC comment cards filled in by patients and spoke with two other patients. This information gave us a positive view of the practice.
During the inspection we spoke with both dentists, three dental nurses, the receptionist and the practice manager. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.
The practice is open:
Monday: 8.30am to 1.00pm and 2.00pm to 7.00pm
Tuesday: 8.30am to 1.00pm
Wednesday: 8.30am to 1.00pm and 2.00pm to 5.30pm
Thursday: 8.30am to 1.00pm and 2.00pm to 5.30pm
Friday: 8.30am to 2.00pm
Saturday: 9.00am to 12.00pm (by prior appointment only)
Our key findings were:
- The practice was not purpose built but was clean and well maintained (a refurbishment plan to upgrade the practice was in place).
- The practice had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance.
- Staff knew how to deal with emergencies. Medicines and life-saving equipment were available but adjustments were needed to the contents and the storage of the kit.
- The practice had systems to help them manage risk.
- The practice had suitable safeguarding processes and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding adults and children.
- The practice had thorough staff recruitment procedures.
- The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
- Staff treated patients with dignity and respect and took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
- The appointment system met patients’ needs.
- The practice had effective leadership. Staff felt involved and supported and worked well as a team.
- The practice asked staff and patients for feedback about the services they provided.
- The practice dealt with complaints positively and efficiently.
There were areas where the provider could make improvements and should:
- Review the practice’s arrangements for receiving and responding to patient safety alerts, recalls and rapid response reports issued from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and through the Central Alerting System (CAS), as well as from other relevant bodies such as, Public Health England (PHE).
- Review the availability, storage and checking process of medicines and equipment to manage medical emergencies giving due regard to guidelines issued by the Resuscitation Council (UK), and the General Dental Council (GDC) standards for the dental team.
- Review it’s responsibilities as regards to the Control of Substance Hazardous to Health (COSHH) Regulations 2002 and, ensure all documentation is up to date and staff understand how to minimise risks associated with the use of and handling of these substances.
- Review the practice’s infection control procedures and audit protocols giving due regard to guidelines issued by the Department of Health - Health Technical Memorandum 01-05: Decontamination in primary care dental practices and The Health and Social Care Act 2008: ‘Code of Practice about the prevention and control of infections and related guidance.
- Review the practice’s protocols for medicines management and ensure all medicines are stored safely and securely.
- Review the security of prescription pads in the practice and ensure there are systems in place to monitor and track their use.
- Review stocks of medicines and equipment and the system for identifying and disposing of out-of-date stock.
- Review the practice’s sharps procedures giving due regard to the Health and Safety (Sharp Instruments in Healthcare) Regulations 2013.
- Review its audit protocols to document learning points that are shared with all relevant staff and ensure that the resulting improvements can be demonstrated as part of the audit process.