• Hospital
  • Independent hospital

Archived: SpaMedica Liverpool

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

5 St Pauls Square, Liverpool, Merseyside, L3 9SJ (0161) 838 0870

Provided and run by:
SpaMedica Ltd

Important: This service is now registered at a different address - see new profile

All Inspections

19 September 2019

During a routine inspection

Spamedica Limited is operated by Spamedica Ltd. The service is located in Liverpool and facilities include one operating theatre, four consulting rooms and a waiting room.

The service provides cataract surgery and yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser (YAG) capsulotomy services for NHS patients over the age of 18 years.

We inspected this service using our comprehensive inspection methodology. We carried out the unannounced part of the inspection on 19 September 2019.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we ask the same five questions of all services: are they safe, effective, caring, responsive to people's needs, and well-led? Where we have a legal duty to do so we rate services’ performance against each key question as outstanding, good, requires improvement or inadequate.

Throughout the inspection, we took account of what people told us and how the provider understood and complied with the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

Services we rate

We rated it as Good overall.

We found good practice in relation to surgery:

  • The service monitored the effectiveness of care and treatment. They used the findings to make improvements and achieved outcomes for patients that were consistently better than the national average.
  • Key services were available seven days a week along with a 24 hour advice line to support timely patient care. Additional appointments were scheduled at weekends to meet patient demand.
  • The service planned care to meet the needs of local people, took account of patients’ individual needs and worked with others in the wider system and local organisations to plan and delivery care. People could access the service when they needed it and waiting times were in line with the national standard.
  • Staff worked well together for the benefit of patients, advised them on how to lead healthier lives, supported them to make decisions about their care, and had access to good information.
  • Staff provided good care and treatment, gave patients enough to eat and drink, and gave them pain relief when they needed it. Managers made sure staff were competent. Staff provided good care and treatment, gave patients enough to eat and drink, and gave them pain relief when they needed it.
  • The service had enough staff to care for patients and keep them safe. Staff had training in key skills, understood how to protect patients from abuse, and managed safety well. The service controlled infection risk well. Staff assessed risks to patients, acted on them and kept good care records. They managed medicines well. The service managed safety incidents well and learned lessons from them. Staff collected safety information and used it to improve the service.
  • Staff treated patients with compassion and kindness, respected their privacy and dignity, took account of their individual needs, and helped them understand their conditions. They provided emotional support to patients, families and carers.
  • Leaders ran services well using reliable information systems and supported staff to develop their skills. Staff understood the service’s vision and values, and how to apply them in their work. Staff felt respected, supported and valued. They were focused on the needs of patients receiving care. Staff were clear about their roles and accountabilities. The service engaged well with patients and the community to plan and manage services and all staff were committed to improving services continually.

We found areas of outstanding practice in surgery:

  • Staff worked especially hard to make the patient experience as pleasant as possible.
  • The service achieved good outcomes that were continually monitored with patients reporting a positive experience.
  • The service had an endophthalmitis box on site in case of an emergency.

Following this inspection, we told the provider that it should make improvements, even though a regulation had not been breached, to help the service improve. Details are at the end of the report.

Name of signatory

Ann Ford

Deputy Chief Inspector of Hospitals