• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Gable Healthcare Services Limited

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

Grosvenor House, George Street, Corby, Northamptonshire, NN17 1QB 07809 428407

Provided and run by:
Gable Healthcare services Limited

Important: This service is now registered at a different address - see new profile
Important: This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 17 April 2019

The inspection:

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

Inspection team:

The inspection was carried out by one inspector.

Service and service type:

Gable Healthcare Services Limited is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care, including live-in care, to people living in their own houses and flats. It provides a service to younger and older adults.

Not everyone using the service receives a regulated activity; the Care Quality Commission (CQC) only inspects the service being received by people provided with ‘personal care’; help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also take into account any wider social care provided.

The service had a manager registered with CQC who was also the provider. This means the provider is legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.

Notice of inspection:

We gave the service 48 hours’ notice of the inspection visit because it is small and the provider is often out of the office supporting staff or providing care. We needed to be sure that they would be in.

Inspection site visit activity started on 15 March 2019 and ended on 18 March 2019. We visited the office location on 15 March to see the provider and to review care records and policies and procedures. On 18 March we visited one person in their own home and telephoned people and their relatives to seek their views and experience of the service. We also spoke with staff.

What we did:

We reviewed the information we had about the service which included any notifications that had been sent to us. A notification is information about important events which the provider is required to send us by law.

We contacted the health and social care commissioners who monitor the care and support the people receive.

We had not asked the provider to send us a provider Information return (PIR). A PIR is a form that asks the provider to give some key information about the service. This includes what the service does well and improvements they plan to make. However, we gave the provider the opportunity to share any information they felt relevant during the inspection.

During the inspection, we spoke with two people who used the service and three relatives. We also had discussions with five members of staff that included care staff, a care coordinator and the provider.

We looked at the care records of three people who used the service and three staff recruitment records. We also examined records in relation to the management of the service such as quality assurance checks, staff training and supervision records, safeguarding information and accidents and incident information.

Overall inspection

Requires improvement

Updated 17 April 2019

About the service: Gable Healthcare Services Limited is a domiciliary care service that was providing personal care and live-in care to five people aged between 18 and 65 and over at the time of the inspection.

People’s experience of using this service:

¿ Improvements were needed to ensure that the systems in place to monitor the quality and standard of the service were effective and consistently maintained.

¿ The provider had failed to display the rating of the last inspection as required.

¿ People’s care plans did not include people’s consent to care and did not have sufficient information to provide all staff with information to deliver person-centred care.

¿ People continued to be cared for safely and had developed positive relationships with staff.

¿ Staff were friendly, passionate about their work and caring; they treated people with respect, kindness, dignity and compassion.

¿ Staff knew their responsibilities as defined by the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA 2005). The provider was aware of how to make referrals if people lacked capacity to consent to aspects of their care and support and were being deprived of their liberty.

¿ People were protected from the risk of harm and received their prescribed medicines safely.

¿ Staff were appropriately recruited and there were enough staff to provide care and support to people to meet their needs.

¿ Staff had access to the support, supervision and training that they required to work effectively in their roles.

¿ People were supported to maintain good health and nutrition.

¿ People knew how to raise a concern or make a complaint and the provider had implemented effective systems to manage any complaints received.

¿ The service had a positive ethos and an open culture. The provider was approachable, understood the needs of people, and listened to staff and relatives.

¿ The service met the characteristics for a rating of “good” in three of the five key questions we inspected and a rating of “requires improvement” in two. Therefore, our overall rating for the service after this inspection was “requires improvement”.

More information is in the full report

We identified a breach of the Health and Social Care Act (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 relating to the requirement as to display of performance assessments.

Details of action we have asked the provider to take can be found at the end of this report.

Rating at last inspection: Good (Report published 29 July 2016)

Why we inspected: This was a planned inspection based on previous rating.

Follow up: We will continue to monitor information and intelligence we receive about the service to ensure good quality is provided to people. We will return to re-inspect in line with our inspection timescales for Requires Improvement services.