• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Beechwood Care Home

65 Portsmouth Road, Woolston, Southampton, Hampshire, SO19 9BE (023) 8043 6880

Provided and run by:
G & A Investments Projects Limited

All Inspections

10, 11, 15 October 2013

During an inspection looking at part of the service

During our last inspection on 6 August 2013, we found the provider was failing to meet essential standards. We served three Warning Notices on the provider and registered manager in relation to non-compliance with regulations regarding cleanliness and infection control, management of medicines and records. We also set a compliance action for meeting the nutritional needs of people using the service.

We conducted a further inspection on 10, 11and 15 October 2013 to check appropriate action had been taken to meet the regulations. During the inspection we identified concerns relating to care and welfare, the suitability of the premises and equipment, and the assessing and monitoring of the quality of service provision.

We spoke to five people who told us the staff were 'very nice' and they liked the food. One person said staff 'look after me well'. We spoke with four external healthcare professionals who told us staff were very caring. However, three of them raised concerns about a lack of awareness by staff of people's care needs. One said staff 'did not identify problems and changes in people's condition' in order to safeguard them from harm.

We found serious concerns about the management of pressure injuries. There were no plans in place to support people who had lost weight and one person who had been prescribed a food supplement had not received it for 10 days as it was out of stock.

Although improvements had been made to the environment, we found some areas of the home were not clean and guidance was not being followed by staff. Effective systems were not in place to reduce the risk and spread of infection.

We found continuing concerns about the management of medicines. Controlled drugs and other medication were not stored securely. Staff did not follow clear procedures and people did not always receive their medicines as prescribed.

A lounge in the building was being used as a temporary bedroom for one person. This was not suitable as it provided no privacy. We saw a ramp had been installed on the upstairs landing that was too steep and put people at high risk of falling. New beds and mattresses had been purchased which were highly unsuitable and had led to six people developing pressure injuries.

There was no effective system in place to identify, assess and manage risks to the health, safety and welfare of people using the service. The records management system was disorganised and did not protect people from receiving unsafe or inappropriate care.

6 August 2013

During an inspection looking at part of the service

During our inspection we identified additional areas of concern relating to the amount of food and fluid people received and the way medicines were managed. We included these areas as part of our inspection.

During our last inspection on 6 and 7 June 2013 we found effective cleaning arrangements were not in place to ensure people were cared for in a clean and hygienic environment. Medication administration records (MAR) for topical creams were incomplete and inaccurate. The provider wrote to us and told us they would address the issues and become compliant by 7 July 2013.

On this occasion, we found the laundry had been improved, the bathrooms were clean and two bedrooms had been refurbished. However, other areas of the home, including bedrooms, bed linen and furniture in communal areas were not clean and hygienic.

We found the care plan for one person receiving end of life care had not been updated to reflect their current needs. Other records relating to the checks of bedrooms and mattresses were found to be inaccurate.

We looked at food and fluid charts and found the amount of food and fluid people received was not being monitored effectively. This meant people were at risk of not receiving sufficient food and fluids to meet their needs.

We looked at 11 MAR charts. We saw there were gaps in the records and the quantity of medication in stock did not correspond with the records. Some people had not received medication that had been prescribed. There was no clear management process for 'as required' medicines. The home's procedures for the administration of controlled drugs were not being followed. We saw records for the administration of topical creams had not been completed.

We found the care plan for one person receiving end of life care had not been updated to reflect their current needs. Other records relating to the checks of bedrooms and mattresses were found to be inaccurate.

6, 7 June 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with one person who used the service, one relative, two members of staff and the manager. The person we spoke with told us they were happy at the service. A relative told us they thought staff had 'endless patience' and all were 'very caring'. During the inspection staff were observed to be respectful and responsive when providing care and support.

The service took steps to ensure people were asked for their consent before they were given care or support. Where people lacked capacity to consent, the provider followed legal requirements to safeguard their rights.

The service was introducing a new, more person-centred format for care plans. This supported the assessment of people's different needs and planning of their care and treatment.

We found a number of significant issues concerning infection prevention and control. The provider had not followed appropriate infection control guidance and had not implemented effective practices. Bedrooms were unclean and unhygienic. Facilities and processes for doing laundry and processing contaminated equipment were inadequate and not fit for purpose.

The provider had in place effective recruitment and selection processes, and appropriate pre-employment checks were undertaken.

Our previous inspection found some key records were incomplete and inaccurate. We found the service had made improvements, but there were still some minor outstanding issues regarding accuracy and completeness of records.

20 November 2012

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We did not on this occasion speak with people directly. We found that although people were receiving their prescribed topical creams as directed there were no accurate medicine adminstration record sheets being kept by staff.

7 September 2012

During a routine inspection

We spoke with one visitor who told us that they were very pleased with the care provided to their relative. The told us the home always smelt clean when they visited and they had no complaints about any aspect of the service. They told us that they knew how to complain but felt able to raise any concerns with the manager of the home.

People told us that they liked living in the home and the staff treated them with respect. People said that they felt safe and that the staff were kind and courteous. One relative told us that they would feel confident to approach the staff if they had any concerns.

We used the Short Observational Framework for Inspection (SOFI) tool during our visit. SOFI is a specific way of observing care to help us understand the experiences of people who could not talk to us. This included looking at the support that was given to them by the staff. We saw that people had positive experiences and staff working with people knew the support they needed and respected their wishes.

People told us that they had "nice meals" and "choice of food". One person told us that Beechwood supported them with a soft diet which was still enjoyable.