• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Russley Lodge

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

276 Wilbraham Road, Chorlton, Manchester, Greater Manchester, M16 8WP (0161) 881 2989

Provided and run by:
Russley Care Homes Limited

All Inspections

14 June 2017

During a routine inspection

Russley Lodge provides accommodation and personal care for up to a maximum of 17 people. At this inspection 17 people were living there.

At the last inspection the service was rated good. At this inspection we found the service remained good.

People continued to remain safe as staff knew how to recognise and respond to concerns of ill-treatment and abuse. There were enough staff to support people to meet their needs. The provider followed safe recruitment procedures when employing new staff members. People had their medicines when they needed them and were assisted by trained and competent staff.

People were assisted by a staff team who had the skills and training to effectively support them. They continued to receive care that was effective and personalised to their individual needs and preferences.

People were supported to have choice and control over their lives. They were assisted by staff in the least restrictive way possible. Staff were aware of current guidance which informed their practice and people’s rights were protected by the staff who supported them.

People received support that continued to be caring and respectful.

People’s privacy and dignity was respected by those providing assistance. People were supported at times of upset and distress.

People had care and support plans that continued to reflect their personal needs and preferences. When changes occurred in people’s personal and medical circumstances, these plans were reviewed to reflect the changes.

Staff members knew people’s likes and dislikes and supported them in the manner they preferred. People and their relatives were encouraged to raise any concerns or complaints. The provider had systems in place to address any issues raised with them.

Russley Lodge continued to be well-led by a management team that people and staff found approachable and supportive. People were involved in decisions about their care and support and their suggestions were valued by the provider.

Staff members felt valued as employees and their opinions and ideas were listened to by the provider. The provider had systems in place to monitor the quality of service they provided and where necessary made changes to drive improvements.

Further information is in the detailed findings below.

21 April 2015

During a routine inspection

The Inspection took place on 21 April 2015 and was unannounced. We last inspected the home on 19 September 2014 where we found two breaches of the legal requirement in relation to the storage medicine and the quality of the information kept about people who used the service. At the inspection on 21 April 2015 we found significant improvements had been made in these areas.

Russley Lodge Care Home is registered to accommodate a maximum of 17 older people who require support with personal care.

The home had a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are registered persons. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

We spoke with care staff who told us they felt supported and that the registered manager was always available and approachable. Throughout the day we saw that people and staff were very comfortable and relaxed with the registered manager and staff on duty. The atmosphere was calm and we saw staff interacted with people in a very friendly and respectful manner.

Care records contained risk assessments. These identified risks and described the measures and interventions to be taken to ensure people were protected from the risk of harm. The care records we viewed also showed us that people’s health was monitored and referrals were made to other health care professionals where necessary. We saw records were kept where people were assisted to attend appointments with various health and social care professionals to ensure they received care, treatment and support for their specific conditions.

We found people’s care plans were written in a way to describe their care, treatment and support needs. These were regularly evaluated, reviewed and updated. Since the last inspection, where improvements had been needed, the home had implemented new care plans. We viewed these care plans and saw immediately that they were much more user friendly and contained information which was person centred and specific to each person, identifying their needs and the level of support required.

The staff that we spoke with understood the procedures they needed to follow to ensure that people were kept safe. They were able to describe the different ways that people might experience abuse and the correct steps to take if they were concerned that abuse had taken place.

Our observations during the inspection showed us that people were supported by sufficient numbers of staff. We had received some information of concern that there may not be enough staff at tea time. We discussed this with the manager and the provider who said they would re assess how many staff were needed at key times during the day. On the day of the inspection we saw staff were responsive to people’s needs and wishes.

When we looked at the staff training records they showed us staff were supported to maintain and develop their skills through training and development activities. The staff we spoke with confirmed they attended face to face and e-learning training to maintain their skills. They told us they had regular supervisions with the registered manager where they had the opportunity to discuss their care practice and identify further training needs. We also viewed records that showed us there were appropriate recruitment processes in place.

The registered manager and staff understood their responsibilities under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS).

During the inspection we saw staff were attentive and caring when supporting people. When we spoke with people who used the service and their relatives we were told they were extremely happy with the care, treatment and support the home provided.

We observed people were encouraged to participate in activities that were meaningful to them and which they enjoyed. Activities were evaluated to ascertain who had enjoyed them and who had not. For those who had not, alternatives were considered.

We saw people were encouraged to eat and drink sufficient amounts to meet their needs. We observed people being offered a selection of choices.

We found the building met the needs of the people who used the service. For example, the environment was suitable for people who used a walking aid and wheelchair users. There was a ramp outside the building which enabled people who used wheelchairs or walking aids to exit the building. The ramp however needed hand rails to enable people who could walk to use it safely. The provider told us they were looking at the most suitable design to enable people who used wheelchairs to be able to navigate safely and was something which would be done as a priority.

We saw a complaints procedure was displayed in the main reception of the home. This provided information on the action to take if someone wished to make a complaint.

We found an effective quality assurance system operated. The service had been regularly reviewed through a range of internal and external audits. Prompt action had been taken to improve the service or put right any shortfalls they had found. We found people who used the service, their representatives and other healthcare professionals were regularly asked for their views.

19 September 2014

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out this inspection on the 19 September to check that concerns highlighted during our last inspection in April 2014 had been addressed. We found that some improvements had been made, but further improvements were required to ensure documentation accurately reflected the needs of people using the service and medication was stored safely.

We spoke with three people who lived at the home and two visitors who all told us that they were happy with the care and support provided. Comments we received included; 'The staff know me very well', 'They know what I like and don't like', 'I'd say they look after me properly' and 'They know how to care for (my family member.)'

9 April 2014

During a routine inspection

We considered our inspection findings to answer questions we always ask:-

' Is the service safe?

' Is the service effective?

' Is the service caring?

' Is the service responsive?

' Is the service well-led?

Below is a summary of what we found.

Is the service safe?

People told us they felt safe. One person said, 'I feel very safe living here, the staff know me and look after me very well.'

People were cared for in an environment which was generally clean and hygienic, although we did find an area of the home not used by people living there was in need of attention and materials to be removed from a bathroom.

At the time of the inspection, there were no people in the home subject to Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards.

We found there were concerns with the medication procedures which put people at risk of harm. We have asked the provider to tell us what they are going to do to meet the requirements of the law in relation to management of medicines.

The home had emergency procedures in place to keep people safe from harm, including appropriate fire evacuation procedures for each person living there.

Is the service effective?

People told us that they were happy with the care they received and that their needs were met. It was clear from our observations and from speaking with staff that staff had a good understanding of the people's care and support needs and that they knew them well. Staff had received training to meet the needs of the people living at the home.

The provider had been given an action at our last inspection to make improvements to people's care records, including for example; care plans and risk assessments. We found that these improvements had not been completed. We have asked the provider to tell us what they are going to do to meet the requirements of the law in relation to maintenance of accurate records for people living in the home.

Visitors told us that they were able to visit whenever they liked and staff were always helpful.

Is the service caring?

We saw care workers were patient and gave reassurance when supporting people. People told us they were able to do things at their own pace and were not rushed. Our observations confirmed this. One person told us, 'It's great here, I am very happy and people care about me.' We asked two relatives and carers if they had any concerns about the care provided by the home and they told us that were happy with the care provided. One relative or carer said, 'I have been coming here for years and have never seen anything of concern, the staff are very caring.'

Is the service responsive?

People's needs had been assessed before they moved into the home. One relative told us the home had helped to arrange an appointment for additional health care needs to be addressed.

One person told us they attended meetings for people living in the home. They told us staff listened to them and helped them with anything they had comments or concerns about. Staff told us, 'People have appointed a spokesperson to help them speak out at meetings, as some people are shy.'

People had access to activities important to them and were supported to maintain relationships with their friends and relatives.

Is the service well-led?

Staff had a good understanding of the ethos of the home and quality assurance processes were in place. Additionally, a monthly medication audit was to be implemented immediately after the inspection after some concerns were highlighted with the management of medication.

We found that action was required from the previous inspection which had not yet been completed. We have asked the provider to tell us what they are going to do to meet the requirements of the law in relation to maintenance of accurate records for people living in the home.

The manager told us that they had been on person centred planning training and was hoping to use this to further support people living in the home.

30 November 2013

During a routine inspection

We found that people were happy with the service provided at Russley Lodge. We talked with four people who used the service and one relative. People who used the service said: 'I like it here, good food, good company and lots to do.'

Another person told us: 'Staff are very friendly.'

We were also told: 'We have a good time.'

And: 'It's fine, really good. If I need anything they take you out to get it.'

The relative told us: 'I can come once a week and they always seem alright.'

We found that people were involved in planning their care and were treated with dignity and respect. People who used the service had their health and social care needs met in a way which promoted their wellbeing.

We found that the food and nutrition provided at Russley Lodge was varied and met the needs of people who used the service. On the day of the inspection we saw that the home was appropriately staffed.

We found that there was a comprehensive complaints policy which meant that complaints would be taken seriously and a fair and open investigation would take place.

We noted that records about the care and support required by people who used the service needed to be improved to ensure care was properly planned so that people were kept safe at all times.

22 January 2013

During a routine inspection

The people who used the service said they were happy with the care they received. They said the staff were always friendly and helpful. Their comments included:

'The staff are really very nice'.

'The girls are lovely, I get the care I need and I like living here.'

'The staff have never treated me badly and never spoken to me badly, they never would.'

'The staff are very good, you can have a bit of a laugh with them.'

'I get to see the doctor straight away if I'm not well, the manager is very good with that sort of thing, there are never any delays.'

Relatives of the people who used the service said they were very happy with the care provided. They described the staff as 'very kind' and 'really nice'. Their comments included:

'I'm very happy with the care. The manager always keeps me up to date with how my mum is. She is very well looked after and I'm very happy with the way things are going.'

'My sister is invited to the care plan reviews so we all know what's going on, but the staff always tell me how my mum is when I visit.'

'I really like the staff here, they are always very friendly. I've never heard anyone speak badly to any of the residents.'

'My relative is very well looked after. She has been in hospital recently. The staff were very quick to get the doctor.'

'If I wanted to make a complaint, I would speak to any of the staff, they are all very approachable.'

20 January 2012

During a routine inspection

During our visit on the 20 January 2012 we spent time observing staff interactions with people. We also spoke with some people living at the home.

Whilst chatting with people we asked them about the support they received and if they had any concerns. People told us they had not and commented, 'I've got no problems, they look after everybody' and 'I like living at this home'. We were also told: 'It's not like home but I like it here', 'We go out from time to time with staff' and 'Sometimes I spend time in my own room as there aren't really many people I can chat with'.

One person spoken with was fully aware of their care treatment and support and was informed about additional treatment they were receiving from the visiting district nurses.

From our observations we found that people enjoyed a good rapport with staff. People were helped in a supportive way, which was unhurried.

During our visit we also had the opportunity to speak with a number of staff about their experiences of working at the home and the support they receive. They told us; 'They have been very supportive'. 'We get on well with the manager, we work well together' and 'The team generally works well together'.

As already identified as part of this review we contacted the Local Authority for their feedback about the service. They confirmed that they carried out the routine contract compliance monitoring visits. The last review being completed in June 2011. We were told they had no issues with the service at that time.