• Care Home
  • Care home

The Manor Exminster

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Main Road, Exminster, Exeter, Devon, EX6 8AP (01392) 824063

Provided and run by:
The Manor, Exminster Limited

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 11 May 2019

The inspection: We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

Inspection team: An inspector and an expert by experience visited the service. An expert by experience is a person who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses care services for older people.

Service and service type: The Manor Exminster is a 'care home.' People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as single package under one contractual agreement. The Care Quality Commission (CQC) regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection.

In July 2018 when the previous manager left, local professionals raised safeguarding concerns about some people’s care. A safeguarding meeting was held which identified the service needed some support to improve some aspects of safety and quality of care. Since then, local professionals and the local authority quality monitoring team have been working with the service to make those improvements.

The service had a new manager who registered with the Care Quality Commission on 28 March 2019. This meant that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.

Notice of inspection: This inspection was unannounced. We visited the service on 9 and 10 April 2019.

What we did: Prior to the inspection we reviewed all information we held about the home, such as details about incidents the provider must notify CQC about. The provider sent us a Provider Information Return. This is information we require providers to send us to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make.

We spoke with 10 people and six relatives to ask them about their experience of the care provided. We looked at four people's care records and at their medicine records. We spent time in communal areas and observed staff interactions with people. We used the Short Observational Framework for Inspection (SOFI). SOFI is a way of observing care to help us understand the experience of people who could not talk with us.

We spoke with the registered manager, deputy manager, a volunteer and with eight members of staff which included care, housekeeping, catering and maintenance staff. We looked at four staff files around staff recruitment, supervision, appraisal and staff training records. We also looked at quality monitoring records relating to the management of the service. We sought feedback from commissioners and health and social care professionals who worked with staff at the home. We received a response from five of them.

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 11 May 2019

About the service: The Manor Exminster is a residential care home that was providing personal care for up to 25 people aged 65 and over. 25 people lived there at the time of the inspection.

People’s experience of using this service:

People were supported by caring and compassionate staff who treated them with dignity and respect. They received person centred care based on their individual needs and preferences. Staff were aware of people's life history, and their communication needs. They used this information to develop positive, meaningful relationships with people.

People and relatives said the service was safe. Staff demonstrated an awareness of each person's safety and how to minimise risks for them. There were enough staff who worked flexibly to ensure people received care and support in a timely way.

People were supported by staff who received regular training and supervision to provide them with the skills and knowledge to meet people’s needs. Staff worked in partnership with local professionals to provide effective care, support and treatment.

People were asked for their consent before they received any care and treatment. People were supported in the least restrictive way possible; the policies, systems and culture in the service supported this practice.

People were encouraged to socialise and pursue their interests and hobbies in a variety of creative ways. Where people chose to remain in their room, isolation was prevented by regular visits from staff and volunteers. Care plans were up to date about people’s individual needs and preferences.

People’s concerns were listened and responded to. Accidents, incidents and complaints were used as opportunities to improve the service.

The service was well led. People, relatives and professionals told us about improvements under the leadership of the new registered manager. The provider’s quality monitoring systems which included audits, observation of staff practice and regular checks of the environment, with continuous improvements made in response to findings.

Rating at last inspection: Good. (14 November 2016)

Why we inspected: Why we inspected: This was a planned inspection based on the rating at the last comprehensive inspection. At this inspection, the service remained Good.

Follow up: We will continue to monitor intelligence we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If any concerning information is received we may inspect sooner.

For more details, please see full report which is on the CQC website at www.org.uk