• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Cumbria Homecare Ltd

Buttermere Pavilion, Ingwell Drive, Westlakes Science and Technology Park, Moor Row, Cumbria, CA24 3JZ (01946) 695552

Provided and run by:
Cumbria Homecare Ltd

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

19 February 2014

During a routine inspection

An expert by experience spoke to people who used the service. Experts by experience are members of the public who have some experience of health and social care. Here are some of the things people told us:

'I have the same carers every day and they are wonderful.'

'They are alright...I can't grumble about them.'

'All the girls are very nice who come to me.'

We were made aware that there had been a number problems with the rostering of staff including missed and late calls.

'I never know when they are coming.'

'A rota is sent to me but it keeps changing.'

"'They send people first thing in the morning who I do not know... they are total strangers.'

No one had come to any serious harm but we considered that potentially these problems could have serious consequences and we asked the provider to take action due to this risk to the care and welfare of vulnerable people.

We judged that when care was delivered in a timely fashion the outcomes for people were good.

We also looked at the way this service helped and supported people to take their medication. We found that this was being managed appropriately.

We looked at the way staff were recruited and we found that good systems were in place. The manager ensured that new staff were the right kind of people to work with vulnerable adults.

We also looked at the staffing levels in the service. We judged that the service was suitably staffed for the levels of activity on the day that we visited.

During our visit we inspected a wide range of records and we saw that good recording systems were in place.

11 January 2013

During an inspection looking at part of the service

On our last two inspections of this service in January 2012 and October 2012 we judged that the provider was not meeting the required standards in a number of areas. We were particularly concerned about the delivery of care and the reliability of the service, such as late and missed visits to people. We also found that record keeping was not up to the required standards. We told the provider that action was needed to make improvements so that people received the support they needed. This visit was to check on these two areas in particular.

The organisation had recently revised its quality monitoring system in order to make the agency run more efficiently and to try to address the problems. We noted an overall improvement to how the service was managed. We saw how the agency had improved systems for allocating and organising care workers. This had led to a more efficient and reliable service offered to people.

People we spoke with said, "It's definitely got alot better, I would say that carers are occasionally late now but by about five minutes." On our visit in October 2012 most people we spoke with said they received good care from the individual care workers during their visit and we were told the majority of staff had a good attitude. This continues to be the case and people now reported the service overall was more reliable.

28 August 2012

During a themed inspection looking at Domiciliary Care Services

We carried out a themed inspection looking at domiciliary care services. We asked people to tell us what it was like to receive services from this home care agency as part of a targeted inspection programme of domiciliary care agencies with particular regard to how people's dignity was upheld, and how they can make choices about their care. The inspection team was led by a Care Quality Commission (CQC) inspector joined by an Expert by Experience who has personal experience of using, or caring for someone who uses this type of service.

We carried out 18 telephone interviews and three home visits to people who use the service and to their main carers (a relative or friend) to gain views about the service. We visited the office on the 28 August 2012 and the 9 October 2012 to look at records and talk to the person in charge. We also talked to senior staff and three care workers. We also looked at the results from the organisation's own survey carried out in March 2012.

At the time of the inspection the manager told us that they had been experiencing staffing problems, in particular, issues with a high rate of staff sickness. Both she and supervisors had been doing care work to cover the shifts. She told us about the measures they had already put in place to improve the quality of the service, which included a recruitment drive to add a minimum of 20 extra care workers.

A large number of people we spoke with were unhappy with the reliability of the service, stating they frequently had care workers turning up late, and not staying the agreed length of time. A number of people commented about care workers being rushed. Some said they had also experienced care workers not turning up at all. People told us when they had rung the office to find out what was happening, office staff had been unhelpful and could give them no information or explanation.

One person summed it up by telling us, "The carers are absolutely brilliant, the big snag is the timing though. They are often late and there's nothing worse than waiting. And they don't ring you, so you start to get worried about them, because they are such nice girls". Another person we spoke with had similar issues saying, "Most of the carers are top class, some could do with a bit more training, but it's Fridays and the weekends when the care is unreliable. We are sick of it".

Healthcare professionals also told us they frequently made appointments to meet with the care workers in people's homes to discuss care, or to demonstrate the use of equipment and the care workers turned up late or not at all.

However, the majority of people we spoke with said they received good care from the individual care workers during their visit. People we spoke with said that they were treated with dignity and respect by the care workers while delivering care. Saying things like, "The carers are great, you couldn't fault them" and 'I wouldn't swap them, my carers are out of this world, it's great to see a friendly face come through the door."

The majority of people felt they had been involved with decisions about their care. They told us they had been involved in setting up their care plans, and that from time to time supervisors came to check up to see if any changes were needed.

People also reported to us concerns about the high turnover of staff. A number of social workers also told us that their 'clients' had complained to them about the number of care workers they had from Bethsaida. They had been worried about not knowing any of them, and not knowing who was going to turn up for the next visit. One person told their social worker, "This has been going on for some time and things have not changed. I have had 12 different carers in the past 28 days due to staff sickness and holidays."

Overall we concluded that general staff shortages were affecting all aspects of the quality of the service being offered to people. When we gave the manager and owner feedback on our concerns about the running of the agency they acknowledged the seriousness and expressed their determination to put things right as soon as possible. We were immediately sent an action plan following our visit on the 28 August 2012. Due to the nature of these concerns we revisited the service on 9 October 2012 to see if these proposed plans had improved the delivery of the service.

Following this second visit we noted some improvements which included employing two new care workers, with a further seven going through recruitment checks. Care plans continued to be updated by one of the supervisors. The agency manager had held meetings with the local social work team to discuss how they intended to organise the care worker's patches more effectively. However, we still found that people were experiencing frequent late calls, and occasional missed calls as a result of staff shortages but also due to poor organisation of care workers. These improvements were not at the pace and level necessary to ensure that people were offered a safe and effective service. We have taken enforcement action against Bethsaida Home Care Services.

17 February 2012

During a routine inspection

We contacted a number of people by telephone and we received very positive comments about the direct care given by staff.

"My relative is not the easiest of people to deal with but they get on well and [my relative] thinks the world of the girls...and I think they are wonderful".

"I get on well with all the carers...we can have a laugh but they are polite and respectful".

"The staff are all very good and I have nothing to grumble about with them or the way they act towards me...nice girls, very polite and kind".

"They are excellent...super, nice polite girls...nothing to complain about".

"Very nice young women...very conscientious".

A number of people were also very positive about the manager and supervisory staff.

"They...and the staff ...supported me and my relative through a very difficult time in a very professional way. They understand my relative and communicate well."

"[The supervisor] just needs a phone call from me and she makes sure I get an early visit if I need to get to an appointment".

"We hear from [the manager] fairly regularly and I wouldn't hesitate to call her if something was wrong".

We also got some less positive comments.

"The staff complain quite a lot about the way the work is organised...I think they need to get their act together at that office or they will loose even more good staff".

"I can't complain about the lasses...but sometimes the second one is late or doesn't turn up...the fault lies in the office. It isn't very well organised".

"Sometimes I have inexperienced young staff...nice enough girls...but maybe they need a bit more training".

"I haven't had any formal visits but [ one of the owners, the manager and supervisors] have actually delivered care. It might be nice to have a proper formal visit and some bits of my plan could be changed a little".

"There seems to be a lot of staff sickness and good people do leave...I don't always know who is coming to my home next...and I would prefer it if I did".