20 September 2018
During a routine inspection
This inspection was carried out to check on how people were being supported due to concerns identified by the local authority about risks to people. The last inspection of this service in September 2015 rated the service as ‘Good’ overall with a ‘Requires Improvement’ in the Safe question.
Dudley and Wolverhampton Domiciliary Care is registered to provide personal care services to people in their own houses and flats in the community and specialist housing. This service is a domiciliary care agency. It provides a service to older adults, younger disabled adults and children.
This service provides care and support to people living in a number of ‘supported living’ settings, so that they can live in their own home as independently as possible. People’s care and housing are provided under separate contractual agreements. CQC does not regulate premises used for supported living; this inspection looked at people’s personal care and support.
On the day of the inspection there were 26 people receiving support. There was no registered manager in post as they had recently left. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.
Care staff were trained to recognise risks to people to keep them safe. There were enough care staff to ensure people were supported timely and medicines were administered. Care staff were provided with personal protective equipment to support people in a way that reduce the risks of infection.
Training was provided to care staff so they had the skills and knowledge to meet people’s needs. People made their own decisions as to how they were supported. The provider adhered to the Mental Capacity Act (2005).
Care staff supported people in a friendly and kind manner. People were involved in the assessments and care planning process so they could be supported how they wanted. People were supported respecting their privacy, dignity and independence.
People’s views were listened to in how they were being supported. The provider had a complaints process in place to enable people to raise concerns they may have.
The provider carried out spot checks and audits but these were not effective in ensuring the quality of the service was maintained. Care records did not consistently reflect accurately or clearly people’s support needs.
While people could complete a questionnaire to share their views on the service they received, the provider did not ensure the outcomes and actions from the process was shared with people.