• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Appletree Care Home

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

158 Burnt Oak Broadway, Burnt Oak, Edgware, Middlesex, HA8 0AX (020) 8381 3843

Provided and run by:
Appletree Court Care Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

11 August 2015

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out an unannounced comprehensive inspection of this service on 16 January 2015 at which two breaches of legal requirements were found. The registered provider had not made appropriate Deprivation of Liberty (DoLS) applications for people who lacked capacity to make decisions and we found that there was not a sufficient number of staff available to meet people’s needs.

After the comprehensive inspection, the provider wrote to us to say what they would do to meet legal requirements in relation to these breaches.

We undertook a focused inspection on 11 August 2015 to check that they had followed their plan and to confirm that they now met legal requirements.

This report only covers our findings in relation to these topics. You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection, by selecting the 'all reports' link for Appletree Care home on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

Appletree Care Home provides accommodation, nursing and personal care for up to 77 older people, the majority of whom have dementia. The third floor supports people with residential care needs and the first floor and second floor supports people who also have nursing needs. On the day of our visit there were 70 people living in the home.

The home has a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

At our focused inspection on 11 August 2015, we found that the provider had followed their plan and legal requirements had been met.

We found that the provider had employed additional care and nursing staff and staff had been deployed appropriately to meet people’s needs.

We found that that appropriate DoLS applications had been made for all people using the service who lacked capacity to consent to remaining in the home.

16th January 2015

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 16th January and was unannounced. At our last inspection in December 2013 the service had met all the regulations we looked at. Appletree Court Care Home provides accommodation, nursing and personal care for up to 77 older people, the majority of whom have dementia. The third floor supports people with residential care needs and the first floor and second floor supports people who also have nursing needs. On the day of our visit there were 70 people living in the home.

There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

We found hat there were insufficient numbers of suitably qualified, skilled and experienced staff to care for the number of people with complex needs in the home, staff told us they felt rushed and we observed a number of people waiting to be attended to during our visit.

You can see what action we told the provider to take at the back of the full version of this report.

People were mostly positive about the service and the staff who supported them. One person told us, “staff are very kind, patient and friendly.” We saw people being treated with warmth and kindness. Staff were aware of people’s individual needs and how they were to meet these needs. Relatives we spoke with were also positive about the service, staff and management. One relative told us,” “The nurses are amazing, excellent, the staff are so caring and gentle and there when you need them.”

The care staff we spoke with demonstrated a good knowledge of people’s care needs, significant people and events in their lives, and their daily routines and preferences. They also understood the provider’s safeguarding procedures and could explain how they would protect people if they had any concerns.

The registered manager had been in place since April 2007. She provided good leadership and people using the service, relatives and staff told us the manager promoted very high standards of care. One person told us “She does an amazing job in a very demanding workplace; she’s always here beyond her hours, she has the residents’ interests at heart.”

People were cared for by staff who were supported to deliver care and treatment safely and to an appropriate standard.

Robust recruitment and selection procedures were in place and appropriate checks had been undertaken before staff began work. Medicines were managed safely and that care workers and nursing staff had detailed guidance to follow when administering medicines. Staff completed extensive training to ensure that the care provided to people was safe and effective to meet their needs

The Care Quality Commission (CQC) is required by law to monitor the operation of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS). There had only one application for Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) for people using the service at the time of our inspection, the manager had recently attended training, however there were a number of people at the service who may be unlawfully deprived of their liberty. We have asked the provider to take immediate action to refer them for an assessment to the local authority

The service had an open and transparent culture and encouraged people to provide feedback. Staff and the managers checked the service regularly and took action to make improvements.

15, 17 October 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with seven people who used the service, three visitors and a staff from an advocacy service. All of them informed us that people were well cared for and staff had treated them with respect and dignity.

We observed that people who used the service appeared well cared for and were dressed appropriately. Staff interacted well with people and were described as, 'very kind' and, 'very nice' by people we spoke with.

People who used the service stated that they had access to healthcare professionals and they had been given their medication. Assessments, including risk assessments had been carried out. The care provided had been reviewed regularly to ensure that the current and specific needs of people were met. Appropriate social and therapeutic activities were available.

The home had suitable arrangements for safeguarding people. Staff were aware of the safeguarding policy and procedure aimed at protecting people from abuse.

The home had a recruitment procedure. Staff records indicated that the necessary recruitment checks had been carried out. Staff were knowledgeable regarding their roles and responsibilities.

There were arrangements for quality assurance and audits. A recent satisfaction survey indicated that people who used the service and their representatives were satisfied with the services provided.

3 January 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with two people who use the service and four relatives. Everyone told us they were satisfied with the service provided. One person told us 'staff do everything for us, we have everything we need.' Relatives were happy with the standard of care. For example, one of them told us 'I have no worries about leaving my wife here' and another described the service as 'brilliant.' People said staff were 'very nice' and 'caring and gentle.' People's privacy and dignity were respected.

We found that medicines were stored securely and administered safely to people. Complaints about the service were managed effectively. Staff were given support and training to deliver appropriate care and treatment to people.

11 October 2011

During an inspection in response to concerns

We observed staff interacting with people who used the service. They were respectful at all times and ensured that the privacy of people was maintained. Staff were caring and sensitive in their approach to people. Staff involved people in individual and group activities and encouraged them to take part. We saw that when a person called out, a member of staff attended to them immediately. People who used the service and their relatives considered the staff to be very helpful. People and relatives were listened to and said that the availability of staff was 'good' or 'excellent'.

6 May 2011

During a routine inspection

People who used the service and their relatives told us they were happy with the service provided by the home. People told us they felt well cared for. One person said, 'staff are helpful' whilst another said, 'they know what I need'. A third person told us, 'this is my home. I have my own furniture. It is a wonderful place and I have everything I want.' Everyone we spoke to was happy with the meals provided. Comments we received on the food included: 'the food is good' and 'I get a choice of meals'. A relative told us that, 'if there is something on a menu they don't like they are offered an alternative'. People told us they were treated with respect and their privacy and dignity maintained at all times. People said that staff responded quickly when anyone needed help or assistance and could be trusted. One typical comment we received was: 'staff will listen if you are worried about anything'.