• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Bramley Homecare Ltd

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Unit 24B, Wincombe Business Park, Shaftesbury, Dorset, SP7 9QJ (01747) 855844

Provided and run by:
Bramley Home Care Limited

Important: This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile

All Inspections

During an assessment under our new approach

Bramley Homecare is a domiciliary care agency providing a regulated activity of personal care to people living in their own home. At the time of our assessment, 70 people were in receipt of the regulated activity of personal care. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. The Care Quality Commission (CQC) only inspect where people receive personal care, this includes support with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating.

Who the service is for
This service supports older people, younger adults and people with physical disabilities who are living in their own homes.

Key findings
We carried out this assessment on 17 July and 20 July 2026. This service was previously rated as good. We carried out this assessment to confirm whether the rating of good remains accurate. This report does not provide detailed information on areas where we found practice continues to meet a good standard. Instead, our findings focus on any areas where the service needs to improve or where we found exceptional practice.
Safeguarding systems were in place to protect people from the risk of abuse. Staff understood their responsibility and knew how to recognise and report safeguarding concerns. Staff told us they were confident that any concerns would be acted on appropriately by the registered manager. One staff member said, “I am confident speaking up if I feel something is not right and would raise a concern with management. If I felt a concern had not been dealt with appropriately, I would continue to escalate it. I understand that safeguarding and people’s safety must always come first. Because I have supported some clients over a period of time, getting to know people is also important. It can help you recognise when something has changed in their behaviour, presentation or circumstances that may need reporting.
Staff understood the process for recording accidents and incidents, including escalating concerns to the registered manager when required. One staff member said, “I would record any accident or incident through the correct reporting process and make sure the office or management were informed, particularly if there was an immediate concern about someone’s safety or wellbeing.” The manager had clear oversight of all incidents and accidents and identified the need for assistive equipment to support people who had fallen to the floor, provided there was not a need for medical intervention. They invested in a mobile piece of lifting equipment and ensured staff were trained to safely use it. This enabled the service to respond to people quicker and improve outcomes for them.

Risks to people were identified, assessed and managed, including risks associated with the home environment. People’s needs were assessed before care commenced and reviewed regularly to ensure care continued to meet their needs. One staff member told us, “I monitor for any changes during each visit and report concerns promptly. If I notice a person’s needs have changed, I inform the office or my manager so that their care plan and risk assessment can be reviewed and updated.”

Staff understood the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and the importance of obtaining consent when delivering care and support. One staff member said, “I treat everyone with dignity and respect, regardless of their age, disability, religion, race, gender or background. I encourage people to make their own choices and support their independence as much as possible. I always respect privacy, maintain confidentiality and make sure people are involved in decisions about their care.”

Staff spoke positively about the service and said they felt listened to. One staff member said, “Working at Bramley Homecare has been a positive experience overall. I enjoy supporting people to remain independent in their own homes and feel that providing compassionate, person-centred care is a priority.” Other comments included, “We are encouraged to share our views. I have had queries dealt with quickly”, “Staff are encouraged to report concerns, incidents and suggestions for improvement. I believe learning from incidents and open communication help improve the quality and safety of the service” and “Management is supportive. Whenever you call them for assistance, they will guide you through any problems or areas you are finding difficult. They are there to help.”

Staff received training and ongoing support to carry out their roles safely and effectively, including the safe administration of medicines.

People, relatives, and staff were encouraged to provide feedback about the service. This included a client advisory board meeting Bi-monthly to discuss improvements made and offer suggestions for additional improvements.
Comments from staff described the management team as approachable and supportive. One staff member said, “In my experience, management are approachable and supportive. I feel able to raise concerns or ask for advice when needed, and I believe staff are encouraged to communicate openly to help maintain safe and effective care.”
Recruitment, governance, and oversight systems were in place to help ensure people received safe care. The service embraced the use of AI (Artificial intelligence) supported technology to improve the outcomes of the people using the service. This included trialling AI supported tools. The service was also committed to reducing their carbon footprint.

9 September 2019

During a routine inspection

About the service

Bramley Home Care Ltd provides domiciliary support services to people in their own homes. It provides a service to older people and younger adults some of whom have a physical disability, sensory impairment or dementia. At the time of our inspection there were 76 people receiving a service.

Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also consider any wider social care provided.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

People received consistently safe care because staff had an improved awareness of the risks people faced and how to manage these. People had personalised risk assessments with staff given clear guidance on how to manage people’s health conditions.

People felt safe and were protected from avoidable harm as staff had been trained to recognise signs of abuse and knew who to report this to if they had concerns. The service had a recruitment and selection process that helped reduce the risk of unsuitable staff supporting people.

People’s capacity to consent to decisions about their care and support had been assessed. The service undertook mental capacity assessments and best interest decisions in line with the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

Since the previous inspection quality assurance measures had been improved. The frequency and content of these now provided sufficient oversight of the service people received, effectively identified issues and drove improvements.

People’s care plans had been improved since the previous inspection. These were now person-centred and included detailed personal histories, comprehensive risk assessments and people’s preferred method/s of communication. Staff who completed initial assessments, care plans and reviews were now trained to carry out this task.

People were supported to maintain links with their local community and follow their interests. People looked forward to visits from the staff and said the service had enabled them to stay well and retain some of their independence. They described the care staff as kind, patient and “truly caring professionals.”

People and relatives felt the staff had the required training to meet their needs and were competent. They felt fully involved and informed. People were encouraged to make decisions and express their views about the care and support they received by staff who were respectful and familiar to them.

People’s, relatives and staff member’s views about the service were frequently sought and used to help make improvements. Compliments were shared with staff which helped them feel motivated and proud about their work.

The management of the service were seen as supportive and approachable. Staff were recognised and valued. Effective communication helped the team to remain organised and respond quickly to changes in people’s needs.

The service had established and maintained positive working relationships with other agencies including district nurses, live-in care services, occupational therapists and a hospital discharge team. The service recognised its role in the local community and had sponsored local clubs, a carnival and a sports team.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection and update

The last rating for this service was requires improvement (published 15 September 2018) and there were multiple breaches of regulation. The provider completed an action plan after the last inspection to show what they would do and by when to improve.

At this inspection we found improvements had been made and the provider was no longer in breach of regulations.

Why we inspected

This was a planned inspection based on the previous rating.

Follow up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.

25 June 2018

During a routine inspection

The inspection took place on 25 and 26 June and was announced.

Bramley Homecare Ltd provides domiciliary support services and 24 hour care to people in their own homes. The agency provides care and support to older people and people diagnosed with dementia. At the time of our inspection there were 63 people receiving personal care from the service. There was a central office based just outside Shaftesbury.

Not everyone using Bramley Homecare Ltd received a regulated activity; CQC only inspects the service being received by people provided with ‘personal care’; help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also take into account any wider social care provided.

The service had a registered manager in place. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People did not consistently receive safe care because staff were not all aware about the risks people faced or how to manage these. Staff had good relationships with people, but care plans did not identify people’s risks or provide staff with clear guidance about how to manage these.

People’s capacity to consent to decisions about their care and treatment had not been assessed, or decisions made in peoples best interests in line with the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

Quality Assurance measures were in place but consideration was needed to ensure that the frequency and content of these provided sufficient oversight of the service people received and could effectively identify issues and drive improvements.

Care Plans were not person centred and lacked detail about people’s histories, what was important to them and how their conditions and risks affected them. Staff who completed initial assessments, care plans and reviews had not received training in areas relevant for this role and this was being arranged following the inspection.

People were protected from the risk of harm by staff who understood the possible signs of abuse and how to recognise these and report any concerns.

People were supported by enough staff to provide effective, person centred support. Staff were recruited safely with appropriate pre-employment checks and received training and support to ensure that they had the necessary skills and knowledge to meet people’s needs.

People received their medicines as prescribed and staff worked with healthcare professionals to ensure that people received joined up, consistent care.

People were supported from the spread of infection by staff who understood their role in infection control and used appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE).

People were supported to have enough to eat and drink. People’s preferences for meals were well known and staff offered people choices about what they ate and drank.

People received personalised end of life care from staff who understood their wishes and preferences and ensured that these were respected.

People and those important to them were involved in planning the support they would receive and were asked for their views about the support and any changes to people’s needs. Reviews identified where people’s needs had changed and reflected changes to the support provided in response to this.

People were supported by staff who respected their individuality and protected their privacy. Staff had undertaken training in equality and diversity and understood how to use this learning in practice.

Interactions with people were kind and caring and we observed that people chatted with staff and were comfortable with them in their homes.

People were supported to access healthcare professionals when required and the service worked with external agencies where needed.

Staff were confident in their roles and felt supported by the office team. Feedback indicated that the office were approachable, listened and took actions where necessary.

During our inspection we found three breaches of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014.

You can see what action we told the provider to take at the back of the full version of the report.

17 March 2016

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 17, 22 and 23 March 2016. It was carried out by two inspectors.

Bramley Home Care is registered to provide personal care to people living in their own homes. At the time of our inspection the service provided personal care and support for 60 people. The core hours of the service were 7 am to 10 pm. There was a 24 hour on-call service available.

The service is required to have a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run. The current manager was in the process of applying to be registered and was waiting for checks to be completed.

People told us staff were caring and respectful. People gave us examples of staff treating them with kindness and going the extra mile for them. Such as one member of staff always dropped the local newspaper off to one person because they knew they liked it. Another member of staff brought fish and chips to someone else. A relative told us their relation looked forward to the social interaction with staff and it was as important as the personal care they received. People told us staff treated them as individuals and got to know them well.

People were involved in planning their care and plans were developed based on individual needs and preferences. There was a system for ensuring that reviews took place and people were visited at home by a senior member of staff to ensure that people were receiving the care they needed. Care plans were updated as necessary following a review. People told us their care records accurately reflected the care they received.

There were enough staff to ensure that people received their visits as scheduled and people usually had the same staff group supporting them. People told us that staff usually arrived on time and would contact them if they were going to be late due to traffic or an emergency. Staff told us they had enough travel time between visits and felt they had time to support people safely and in accordance with the persons care plan.

Staff described being proud of their work and spoke warmly about people they supported. They felt they were able to do a good job because people had choice about the care and support they received and were involved in developing their care plan.

Staff received appropriate training which prepared them to carry out their jobs. New staff completed an induction period which was adapted to each individual member of staff based on their experience and confidence. Staff received regular supervision and appraisals were booked.

The manager was motivated and keen to continually find ways of improving the service. People were confident with the manager and told us they were approachable. One person told us they could phone or pop into the office at any time. The manager had systems in place to monitor the quality of the care that people received. Spot checks were carried out on staff and records were reviewed. People were able to provide feedback on the service through quality surveys.