• Hospital
  • Independent hospital

The London Radiotherapy Centre at Guy's and St Thomas'

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Borough Wing,Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT

Provided and run by:
HCA International Limited

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 4 February 2022

The London Radiotherapy Centre at Guy’s and St Thomas’ (LRC) is part of HCA International Limited and provides radiotherapy cancer treatments for private patients. It is situated on the lower ground floor of Guy’s NHS hospital in central London.

The LRC has been registered with CQC since September 2014, for the treatment of disease, disorder or injury. The current Registered Manager has held that post since 2014.

This was our first inspection of this service.

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 4 February 2022

The service had enough staff to care for patients and keep them safe. Staff had training in key skills, understood how to protect patients from abuse, and managed safety well. The service controlled infection risks well. Staff assessed risks to patients, acted on them and kept good care records. They managed medicines well. The service managed safety incidents well and learned lessons from them.

Staff provided good care and treatment, and gave patients pain relief when they needed it. Managers monitored the effectiveness of the service. Staff worked well together for the benefit of patients, advised them on how to lead healthier lives, supported them to make decisions about their care, and had access to good information.

Staff treated patients with compassion and kindness, respected their privacy and dignity, took account of their individual needs, and helped them understand their conditions. They provided emotional support to patients, families and carers.

The service planned care to meet the needs of their patients, took account of their individual needs, and made it easy for people to give feedback. People could access the service when they needed it and did not have to wait for treatment.

Leaders ran services well using reliable information systems and supported staff to develop their skills. Staff understood the service’s vision and values, and how to apply them in their work. Staff felt respected, supported and valued. They were focused on the needs of patients receiving care. Staff were clear about their roles and accountabilities. The service engaged well with patients to plan and manage services and staff were committed to improving services continually.

However:

We found the way the service checked radiotherapy staff competences was not as well developed as it could be and as a result, lacked detail.

We rated this service as good because it was safe, effective, caring, responsive and well led.

Medical care (including older people’s care)

Good

Updated 4 February 2022

The service had enough staff to care for patients and keep them safe. Staff had training in key skills, understood how to protect patients from abuse, and managed safety well. The service controlled infection risks well. Staff assessed risks to patients, acted on them and kept good care records. They managed medicines well. The service managed safety incidents well and learned lessons from them.

Staff provided good care and treatment, and gave patients pain relief when they needed it. Managers monitored the effectiveness of the service. Staff worked well together for the benefit of patients, advised them on how to lead healthier lives, supported them to make decisions about their care, and had access to good information.

Staff treated patients with compassion and kindness, respected their privacy and dignity, took account of their individual needs, and helped them understand their conditions. They provided emotional support to patients, families and carers.

The service planned care to meet the needs of their patients, took account of their individual needs, and made it easy for people to give feedback. People could access the service when they needed it and did not have to wait for treatment.

Leaders ran services well using reliable information systems and supported staff to develop their skills. Staff understood the service’s vision and values, and how to apply them in their work. Staff felt respected, supported and valued. They were focused on the needs of patients receiving care. Staff were clear about their roles and accountabilities. The service engaged well with patients to plan and manage services and staff were committed to improving services continually.

However:

We found the way the service checked radiotherapy staff competences was not as well developed as it could be and as a result, lacked detail.

We rated this service as good because it was safe, effective, caring, responsive and well led.