24 to 25 July 2018
During an inspection looking at part of the service
Consultant Eye Surgeons Partnership (Bristol) LLP is operated by South West Eye Surgeons LLP. Facilities include three consultation rooms and a treatment room.
The service provides outpatients for adults and a small proportion of children and young people.
We inspected this service using our focused inspection methodology. We carried out the unnanounced part of the inspection on 24 and 25 July 2018.
To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we ask the same five questions of all services: are they safe, effective, caring, responsive to people's needs, and well-led? Where we have a legal duty to do so we rate services’ performance against each key question as outstanding, good, requires improvement or inadequate.
Throughout the inspection, we took account of what people told us and how the provider understood and complied with the Mental Capacity Act 2005.
The CQC issued a warning notice against the provider South West Eye Surgeons LLP in October 2017. During this inspection we found areas which required significant improvement included:
- The provider having safe and effective systems and processes to assess, monitor and improve the quality and safety of the service.
- The provider having assurance that staff have qualifications, competence, skills and experience to undertake their role.
- The provider not having oversight of the risks associated to patients undergoing surgery at the hospital.
- The provider not having oversight of records relating to people carrying on the regulated activity by persons employed.
During this inspection we found:
- Although there were cleaning audits found during this inspection, we found they were not being used properly.
- The arrangements for managing waste did not always keep people safe.
- We found a selection of consumables which were out of date which meant that the arrangements for storing this equipment did not always keep people safe.
- We found a large selection of medicines which were out of date which meant the arrangements for managing and storing medicines did not always keep people safe.
- Incidents were not used effectively to inform learning and improvement within the service was limited.
- The service did not identify learning from complaints.
- We are not assured that the registered manager had the appropriate support or training to understand their responsibilities, and did not have oversight of the quality and safety of the service.
- Despite some improvements, for example the collection of information for auditing purposes we found there was no effective review or analysis of this information which could be used to improve the service.
- Assurance systems were not comprehensive which meant performance issues were not escalated appropriately and were not improved as a result.
We found good practice in relation to outpatient care:
- During the last inspection we found that the provider did not maintain a full record of mandatory training completed by staff. We found this to be improved during this inspection.
- During the last inspection we found the provider could not demonstrate that safeguarding training had been undertaken by staff. During this inspection we found the evidence was available.
Following this inspection, we told the provider that it must take some actions to comply with the regulations. We also issued the provider with four requirement notice(s) that affected the provider. Details are at the end of the report.
Amanda Stanford
Deputy Chief Inspector of Hospitals