You are here

Archived: Mill View Outstanding

The provider of this service changed - see old profile

Inspection Summary

Overall summary & rating


Updated 27 September 2018

This inspection took place on 18 April 2018 and was unannounced. There were 46 people using the service.

Mill View is a care home. People in care homes receive accommodation and personal care as single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided and both were looked at during this inspection. Mill View can accommodate up to 50 older people/people living with dementia in a two storey, purpose built home.

At the last inspection in November 2016 we did not identify any breaches of Regulation, but the service was rated ‘Requires improvement,’ because we needed to see the improvements which had been made could be sustained and developed over time.

A registered manager was in place. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

The service was exceptionally well led. The service benefitted from strong leadership. The registered manager was passionate about providing person centred care and this was reflected in every aspect of the service. The registered manager, supported by the senior management team, was continuously looking at ways to improve the service for the benefit of the people who lived there. The registered manager had developed positive working relationships with staff and relevant stakeholders. The registered manager motivated the staff team with regular meetings, formal supervisions and training.

The registered manager understood their responsibilities and worked with people who used the service, relatives, staff and the provider to improve the quality and safety of care that was provided. Quality assurance procedures and a programme of audits were effective in driving continual improvements to the quality of service.

People received an outstanding responsive service. People who used the service received highly personalised care from staff who knew their background, interests and hobbies. The registered manager listened to people who used the service and about what they wanted. A shop, cinema, American style diner had all been created to provide people with interesting and stimulating facilities. Group and individual activities were on offer to keep people occupied. People were encouraged to pass on any concerns so action could be taken to improve the service they received. Excellent links had been made with local groups of young people who were regular and popular visitors.

People were safe because there were systems and processes in place to protect them. Staff, as a result of their training in safeguarding people, understood the different types of harm and to who they could report this to. Risk assessments were in place and these promoted people's safety such as when mobilising around the service. Incidents such as falls were used as an opportunity for learning and to help drive improvements. Medicines were administered, recorded and stored in a safe manner and all staff who administered medicines had received suitable training to do this.

Staff were subject to checks on their suitability before they were offered employment. Enough staff were employed to ensure that people’s needs could be met in a timely manner. Staff were aware of infection control measures and the service was clean and well maintained.

People received an effective service and were supported by staff who had received appropriate training. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible: the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. Staff knew when people needed support and also when to respect people's independence. Staff were supported in their role and they knew what standard of care was e

Inspection areas



Updated 27 September 2018

The service was safe.

Staff were recruited safely. There were enough staff to provide people with the care and support they needed and to keep the home clean.

Staff understood how to keep people safe and where risks had been identified, action had been taken to mitigate those risks.

Staff made sure medicines were managed safely and kept under review.



Updated 27 September 2018

The service was effective.

Staff were inducted, trained and supported to ensure they had the skills and knowledge to meet people�s needs.

Meals at the home were excellent, offering choice and variety. The meal time experience was a calm and relaxed experience for people.

People were supported to access health care services to meet their individual needs.

The legal requirements relating to Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS)

were being met.



Updated 27 September 2018

The service was caring.

People using the services told us they liked the staff and found them attentive and kind. We saw staff treated people with kindness, patience and compassion.

People looked well cared for and their privacy, dignity and independence was respected and maintained.



Updated 27 September 2018

The service was extremely responsive.

Staff knew people extremely well and care records were very detailed and person centred.

People who used the service were always put first and they were valued as individuals. Staff actively listened to them and improvements to their care and the homes facilities had been made as a result.

A full range of stimulating and varied activities were on offer and there were fantastic links with the community.

A complaints procedure was in place and any complaints which had been received had been dealt with promptly.



Updated 27 September 2018

The service was extremely well-led.

A registered manager was in place who provided outstanding leadership and management of the home. They were enthusiastic and determined to provide the best possible service for people and this had happened.

Effective quality assurance systems were in place to assess, monitor and improve the quality of the service.