• Care Home
  • Care home

Favordale Home for Older People

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Byron Road, Colne, Lancashire, BB8 0BH (01282) 860449

Provided and run by:
Lancashire County Council

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 18 November 2020

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider is meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008.

This was a targeted inspection looking at the infection control and prevention measures the provider has in place. As part of the Care Quality Commission’s (CQC’s) response to the coronavirus pandemic we are conducting a review of infection control and prevention measures in care homes.

The inspection took place on 4 November 2020 and was announced.

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 18 November 2020

We carried out an unannounced inspection of Favordale Home for Older People on 13 and 14 February 2018.

Favordale Home for Older People is a ‘care home’. People in care homes receive accommodation and nursing or personal care as a single package under one contractual agreement. CQC regulates both the premises and the care provided, and both were looked at during this inspection. The home is registered to provide accommodation and personal care for up to a maximum of 45 people. The home is divided into three areas known as Wycoller View, Noyna View and Pendle View. Wycoller View and Noyna View provide care for older people with personal care needs and Pendle View provides care for older people living with dementia. At time of the inspection there were 43 people accommodated in the home.

At the last inspection, in September 2016 the service was rated as good. At this inspection, we found the evidence continued to support the rating of good and there was no evidence or information from our inspection and ongoing monitoring that demonstrated serious risks or concerns. This inspection report is written in a shorter format because our overall rating of the service has not changed since our last inspection.

People living in the home told us they felt safe and staff treated them well. People were supported by enough skilled staff. The registered manager monitored staffing levels to ensure people’s needs were met. Appropriate recruitment procedures were followed to ensure prospective staff were suitable to work in the home. Safeguarding adults’ procedures were in place and staff understood their responsibilities to safeguard people from abuse. Potential risks to people's safety and welfare had been assessed and preventive measures had been put in place where required. People's medicines were managed appropriately.

Staff had the knowledge and skills required to meet people's individual needs effectively. They completed an induction programme when they started work and they were up to date with the provider's mandatory training. People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. There were appropriate arrangements in place to support people to have a varied and healthy diet. People had access to a GP and other health care professionals when they needed them. A visiting healthcare professional provided us with positive feedback about the service.

Staff treated people in a respectful and dignified manner and people's privacy was respected. People living in the home had been consulted about their care needs and had been involved in the support planning process as appropriate. We observed people were happy, comfortable and relaxed with staff. Support plans and risk assessments provided guidance for staff on how to meet people’s needs and preferences. There were established arrangements in place to ensure the support plans were reviewed and updated regularly.

The service was responsive to people’s individual needs and preferences. People were given the opportunity to participate in social activities both inside and outside the home. People had access to a complaints procedure and were confident any concerns would be taken seriously and acted upon.

Systems were in place to monitor the quality of the service provided and ensure people received safe and effective care. These included seeking and responding to feedback from people in relation to the standard of care.