• Doctor
  • GP practice

Bartley Green Medical Practice

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

71 Romsley Road, Birmingham, B32 3PR (0121) 477 4300

Provided and run by:
Bartley Green Medical Practice

Assessment report published 15 October 2026

Ratings

  • Overall

    Good

  • Safe

    Good

  • Effective

    Good

  • Caring

    Good

  • Responsive

    Good

  • Well-led

    Good

Our view of the service

Date of Assessment:17 February 2026 to 30 April 2026. Bartley Green Medical Practice is a GP practice and delivers service to5,930 patients under a contract held with NHS England. The National General Practice Profiles states that74% are white,10% are black, 6.8% are a mixed background,6.7% are Asian and2% are other. Information published by Office for Health Improvement and Disparities shows that deprivation within the practice population group is1of 10. The lower the decile, the more deprived the practice population is relative to others. This assessment considered the demographics of the people using the service, the context the service was working within and how this impacted service delivery. Where relevant, further commentary is provided in the quality statements section of this report.

This is the first inspection for this service since the provider registered with Care Quality Commission (CQC), we carried out this inspection to provide a rating.

SAFE:

The service had an effective learning culture and people could raise concerns. Managers investigated incidents thoroughly. People were protected and kept safe. Staff understood and managed risks. The facilities and equipment met the needs of people, were clean and well-maintained and any risks mitigated. There were enough staff with the right skills, qualifications and experience. Managers made sure staff received training and regular appraisals to maintain high-quality care. Staff managed medicines well and involved people in planning any changes.

EFFECTIVE:

People were involved in assessments of their needs. Staff reviewed assessments taking account of people’s communication, personal and health needs. Care was based on latest evidence and good practice. Staff worked with all agencies involved in people’s care for the best outcomes and smooth transitions when moving services. Staff made sure people understood their care and treatment to enable them to give informed consent. Staff involved those who were important to people and took decisions in people’s best interests where they did not have capacity.

CARING:

People were treated with kindness and compassion. Staff protected their privacy and dignity. They treated them as individuals and supported their preferences. People had choice in their care and treatment. The service supported staff wellbeing.

RESPONSIVE:

People were involved in decisions about their care. The service provided information people could understand. People knew how to give feedback and were confident the service took it seriously and acted on it. The service was easy to access and worked to eliminate discrimination. People received fair and equal care and treatment. The service worked to reduce health and care inequalities through training and feedback. People were involved in planning their care and understood options around choosing to withdraw or not receive care.

WELL-LED:

Leaders and staff had a shared vision and culture based on listening, learning and trust. Leaders were visible, knowledgeable and supportive, helping staff develop in their roles. Staff felt supported to give feedback and were treated equally, free from bullying or harassment. Staff understood their roles and responsibilities. Managers worked with the local community to deliver the best possible care and were receptive to new ideas. There was a culture of continuous improvement with staff given time and resources to try new ideas.

 

People's experience of this service

People were positive about the quality of their care and treatment. Recent survey results, including from the National GP Patient Survey and the NHS Friends and Family Test, showed people were satisfied with services. There was an active patient participation group (PPG) who represented the views of people using the service. Representatives from the PPG described how managers made positive changes because of feedback, such as introducing a telephone triage system which had reduced telephone waiting times. The provider shared the outcomes of PPG meeting through a quarterly newsletter available on the website and in paper form within the practice, helping people using the service to be informed and encourage ongoing feedback.