• Care Home
  • Care home

Wood Way Lodge

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

411 Wood Way Lane, Coventry, West Midlands, CV2 2AH (024) 7661 3540

Provided and run by:
Prikal Care Ltd

All Inspections

20 November 2020

During an inspection looking at part of the service

Wood Way Lodge is a care home providing accommodation and personal care to a maximum of four people, living with a learning disability. At the time of our visit three people lived at the home.

We found the following examples of good practice.

¿ Visitors to the home had their temperatures taken and completed a Covid-19 screening questionnaire prior entering the home. Personal protective equipment (PPE, face masks, gloves and hand sanitising gel) were available for visitors to use.

¿ People were supported to maintain contact with relatives and friends who were important to them through video and telephone calls. The management team had maintained regular contact with relatives through emails and telephone calls to keep them informed about the wellbeing of their family member.

¿ Staff changed their clothing upon starting and finishing their shifts, to reduce the risk of cross infection.

¿ People who had tested positive for Covid-19 self-isolated in line with current guidance.

Further information is in the detailed findings below.

3 September 2019

During a routine inspection

About the service: Wood Way Lodge provides accommodation and personal care for up to four people with learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorder. At the time of our visit four people lived at the home. Accommodation is provided in a single storey converted house.

The service has been developed and designed in line with the principles and values that underpin Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. This ensures that people who use the service can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes. The principles reflect the need for people with learning disabilities and/or autism to live meaningful lives that include control, choice, and independence. People using the service receive planned and co-ordinated person-centred support that is appropriate and inclusive for them.

People’s experience of using this service:

The provider’s quality monitoring systems were not effective to ensure people received individualised care and areas requiring improvement were identified. Low staffing levels had significant potential to affect people’s safety. Individual and environmental risks and people’s medicines were not always well-managed. People felt safe and were protected from avoidable harm.

People’s nutritional needs were met. Staff were recruited safely and received the training and support needed to fulfil their roles. People were not always supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff did not always support them in the least restrictive way possible; the policies and systems in the home did not always support least restrictive practice.

The outcomes for people did not fully reflect the principles and values of Registering the Right Support because people’s choice and control over when they could engage in social activities outside of the home was limited.

People’s privacy and dignity was not always upheld. People’s independence was promoted. Staff were caring in nature but did not always have enough time to consistently provide person centred care. People had developed meaningful relationships with staff and staff recognised the importance of supporting people to maintain relationships with their families and the local community.

People’s needs were assessed prior to moving into the home. Care plans were personalised and detailed. The provider’s complaints procedure was available in the home. Complaints had been managed in line with the procedure.

The provider had not maintained a good level of organisational oversight of the service. This meant some previously demonstrated standards had not been sustained. The provider and staff worked in partnership with other professionals to improve outcomes for people. Staff felt supported. The provider was committed to addressing areas where improvement was needed to benefit people.

The registered provider was in breach of Regulations 12, 17 and 18 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection: Good (report published May 2017).

Why we inspected: This was a scheduled inspection based on the previous rating.

Follow up: We will continue to monitor intelligence we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If any concerning information is received, we may inspect sooner.

20 April 2017

During a routine inspection

Wood Way Lodge provides accommodation for up to four people with learning disability or autistic spectrum disorder. At the time of our inspection there were four people living in the home. At the last inspection, in July 2014, the service was rated Good. At this inspection we found that the service remained Good.

People continued to receive care in ways which helped them to remain as safe as possible. There was enough staff to provide support to people to meet their needs. The registered manager had recently appointed a deputy who regularly spent time at the home. Staff understood risks to people’s safety and supported people receive their prescribed medicines safely.

Staff received training which matched the needs of people who lived at the home, so they would develop the skills and knowledge to care for them. People made day to day decisions about their care and staff used their skills to make sure people were agreeing to the care offered to them. Support was available to people if they needed help making key decisions about their life. People were cared for so their nutritional needs were met and to stay well through assistance to access to health care.

People enjoyed spending time with the staff who cared for them and were encouraged to make their own day to day decisions and maintain their independence. People were treated with dignity.

People, their relatives’ and health and social care professionals’ views and suggestions were listened when care was planned. No complaints had been made since our previous inspection, however, systems were in place to manage complaints. Relatives we spoke with knew how to raise any complaints or concerns.

The registered manager worked with people, their relatives and other organisations in an open way so people would enjoy the best well-being possible. Regular checks were in place to assess and monitor the quality of the service.

29 July 2014

During a routine inspection

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider is meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and to pilot a new inspection process being introduced by CQC which looks at the overall quality of the service.

A requirement of the provider’s registration is that they have a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service and has the legal responsibility for meeting the requirements of the law; as does the provider. There was a registered manager in place at the time of our inspection

Wood Way Lodge is a care home for up to four people. This home provides care and support to people with learning difficulties. Four people lived there at the time of our visit. We were able to see and talk with them all.

The CQC is required by law to monitor the operation of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) and to report on what we find. We saw there were policies and procedures in place in relation to the MCA and DoLS. The service had not made any applications to deprive someone of their liberty. We saw from the records we looked at that where people lacked the capacity to make decisions, best interest meetings were held. This was for finances, medicines and other things which affected a person’s safety.

The manager was involved in day to day monitoring of the standards of care and support that was provided to the people who lived at the home. This ensured that people received care and support that met their needs and enabled them to do the things they were interested in.

The home had systems in place to keep people safe. Assessments of the risk to people from a number of foreseeable hazards had been developed and reviewed. We saw that staff followed these guidelines when they supported people.

People’s needs and choices had been documented in their care plans.

During our observations we saw that people were treated with kindness and compassion. People told us staff treated them with respect and dignity, and they felt safe. Staff were able to tell us about the people they supported, for example, their personal histories and their interests.

All the people we spoke with said, or indicated through sign language, that they were happy living at the home.

Relatives, people who used the service and staff were encouraged to provide feedback about Wood Way Lodge to help highlight any areas of improvement that could be made to continuously improve the quality of the service provided.