• Hospital
  • Independent hospital

The Cadogan Clinic

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

120 Sloane Street, London, SW1X 9BW (020) 7901 8502

Provided and run by:
Personal Health Service Limited

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 13 February 2023

The Cadogan Clinic is registered to provide the regulated activities of surgical procedures, treatment of disease, disorder or injury and diagnostic and screening procedures. It provides day case cosmetic surgery and dermatology services to adults. In 2021 the service saw 20,000 patients and carried out 1,600 surgical procedures. The most common procedures were rhinoplasty, facelift, liposuction and breast reduction. The current registered manager has been in post since 2016.

The clinic also provides dermatology services to children aged 3 to 16 years under local anaesthetic. Surgery for 16 and 18 year olds under general anaesthetic is supported by GP evidence that it is for a medical need. Services for children and young people is a small proportion of the clinic’s activity. In 2022, 24 children and young people were treated under local anaesthetic and 2 under general anaesthetic.

The main service was surgery. Where arrangements were the same, we have reported the findings in the surgery section.

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 13 February 2023

This was the first time we rated this service. We rated it as good because:

  • The service had enough staff to care for patients and keep them safe. Staff had training in key skills, understood how to protect patients from abuse, and managed safety well. The service controlled infection risk well. Staff assessed risks to patients, acted on them and kept good care records. They managed medicines well. The service managed safety incidents well and learned lessons from them.
  • Staff provided good care and treatment and gave them pain relief when they needed it. Managers monitored the effectiveness of the service and made sure staff were competent. Staff worked well together for the benefit of patients, advised them on how to lead healthier lives, supported them to make decisions about their care, and had access to good information.
  • Staff treated patients with compassion and kindness, respected their privacy and dignity, took account of their individual needs, and helped them understand their conditions. They provided emotional support to patients, families and carers.
  • The service planned care to meet the needs of local people, took account of patients’ individual needs, and made it easy for people to give feedback. People could access the service when they needed it.
  • Leaders ran services well using reliable information systems and supported staff to develop their skills. Staff understood the service’s vision and values, and how to apply them in their work. Staff felt respected, supported and valued. They were focused on the needs of patients receiving care. Staff were clear about their roles and accountabilities. The service engaged well with patients and the community to plan and manage services and all staff were committed to improving services continually.

Services for children & young people

Good

Updated 13 February 2023

Services for children and young people are a small proportion of the clinic’s activity. The main service was surgery. Where arrangements were the same, we have reported findings in the surgery section.

This was the first time we rated the service. We rated it as good because:

  • The service had enough staff to care for children and young people and keep them safe. Staff had training in key skills and managed safety well. The service controlled infection risk well. Staff assessed risks to children and young people, acted on them and kept good care records. The service managed safety incidents well and learned lessons from them.
  • Staff provided good care and treatment. Managers made sure staff were competent. Staff worked well together for the benefit of children and young people, supported them to make decisions about their care and had access to good information.
  • Staff treated children and young people with compassion and kindness, respected their privacy and dignity, took account of their individual needs, and helped them understand their conditions. They provided emotional support to children and young people, families and carers.
  • The service planned care to meet the needs of local people, took account of children and young people’s individual needs. People could access the service when they needed it and did not have to wait too long for treatment.
  • Leaders ran services well using reliable information systems and supported staff to develop their skills. Staff felt respected, supported and valued. Staff were clear about their roles and accountabilities.

Surgery

Good

Updated 13 February 2023

This was the first time we rated this service. We rated it as good because:

  • The service had enough staff to care for patients and keep them safe. Staff had training in key skills, understood how to protect patients from abuse, and managed safety well. The service controlled infection risk well. Staff assessed risks to patients, acted on them and kept good care records. They managed medicines well. The service managed safety incidents well and learned lessons from them.
  • Staff provided good care and treatment, gave patients enough to eat and drink, and gave them pain relief when they needed it. Managers monitored the effectiveness of the service and made sure staff were competent. Staff worked well together for the benefit of patients, supported them to make decisions about their care, and had access to good information.
  • Staff treated patients with compassion and kindness, respected their privacy and dignity and took account of their individual needs. They provided emotional support to patients, families and carers.
  • The service planned care to meet the needs of local people, took account of patients’ individual needs, and made it easy for people to give feedback. People could access the service when they needed it.
  • Leaders ran services well using reliable information systems and supported staff to develop their skills. Staff understood the service’s vision and values, and how to apply them in their work. Staff felt respected, supported and valued. They were focused on the needs of patients receiving care. Staff were clear about their roles and accountabilities. The service engaged well with patients and the community to plan and manage services and all staff were committed to improving services continually.