• Care Home
  • Care home

Roslyn House

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

68 Molesworth Street, Wadebridge, Cornwall, PL27 7DS (01208) 530138

Provided and run by:
Mrs Janet Brewer

All Inspections

9 May 2023

During an inspection looking at part of the service

About the service

Roslyn House is a residential care home providing accommodation and personal care for up to 9 people. At the time of this inspection 2 people were using this service.

The service was not registered as a specialist service for people with a learning disability or autistic people.

We expect health and social care providers to guarantee autistic people and people with a learning disability the choices, dignity, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. Right support, right care, right culture is the statutory guidance which supports CQC to make assessments and judgements about services providing support to people with a learning disability or autistic people. We considered this guidance as there were people using the service who have a learning disability or who are autistic.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

The deputy manager and provider now have an understanding of the principles of the Right support, right care, right culture guidance and were working towards supporting people to live as independently as possible.

People were now respected and consistently treated with dignity by their support staff. Disrespectful language had been removed from care planning documentation and the importance of use of respectful language had been discussed with all staff. People were now able to withdraw their consent to planned care and monitoring tasks and these decisions were respected by staff and managers.

People were comfortable approaching staff for support and during the inspection chose to spend time chatting with their staff.

Staff had been provided with guidance on how to protect people from identified risks and had provided people with appropriate reminders on road safety when leaving the service independently. We have made a recommendation in relation to how the service supported people to identify and understand risks associated with developing their independence.

The provider now recognised the need for additional staff training on how to support people when upset or anxious. However, this training had not yet been arranged. Where staff had not completed necessary training this had been raised as an issue during supervision meetings.

People received their medicines as prescribed and medicine storage areas were tidy and well organised.

The provider’s recruitment practices had been reviewed and updated to ensure all necessary pre-employment check were completed. No additional staff had been recruited since the last inspection.

People were now regularly supported to access the community and had been offered opportunities to attend religious services. On the day of the inspection both people went to the pub for lunch with staff support and people told us they had particularly enjoyed an event in a local community centre which they hoped to attend again in future.

Complaints and informal concerns had been appropriately investigated by the provider and action taken to resolve these issues. We have made a recommendation in relation to how information is fed back to people to help them understand the actions taken in response to concern raised.

The provider had taken action in response to the issued raised in our previous report and had worked closely with health and social care professionals to improve performance.

The provider’s quality assurance systems had been updated but required further development. Gaps in care monitoring records had not been prevented and action had not yet been taken to address issues in relation to staff skills.

The deputy manager provided effective leadership to the staff team who were complimentary of the support they had received since the last inspection.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection and update

The last rating for this service was Inadequate, (published 6 May 2023).

At this inspection we have found significant improvements have been made and the service has now been rated requires improvement.

This service has been in Special Measures since February 2023. During this inspection the provider demonstrated that improvements have been made. The service is no longer rated as inadequate overall or in any of the key questions. Therefore, this service is no longer in Special Measures.

Why we inspected

We carried out an unannounced comprehensive inspection of this service on 23 February 2023. Breaches of legal requirements were found in relation to person centred care, risk and medicines management, safeguarding, dignity and respect, governance, and staffing. With support from the local authority the provider developed an action plan detailing what they would do and when to improve.

We undertook this focused inspection to check they had followed their action plan and to confirm they now met legal requirements. This report only covers our findings in relation to the Key Questions Safe, Caring, Responsive and Well-led which contain those requirements.

Enforcement and Recommendations

We have identified an ongoing breach in governance procedures and have made recommendations in relation to risk management and complaints handling.

Please see the action we have told the provider to take at the end of this report.

Follow up

We will request a further action plan from the provider to understand what they will do to improve the standards of quality and safety. We will work alongside the provider and local authority to monitor progress. We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service, which will help inform when we next inspect.

23 February 2023

During a routine inspection

About the service

Roslyn House is a residential care home providing accommodation and personal care for up to 9 people with mental health needs. At the time of our inspection 3 people were using this service.

The service was not registered as a specialist service for people with a learning disability or autistic people.

We expect health and social care providers to guarantee autistic people and people with a learning disability the choices, dignity, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. Right support, right care, right culture is the statutory guidance which supports CQC to make assessments and judgements about services providing support to people with a learning disability or autistic people. We considered this guidance as there were people using the service who have a learning disability or who are autistic.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

The service was not working in accordance with the principles of the Right support, right care, right culture guidance.

People were not treated with dignity and respect. Inappropriate and disrespectful language was used to describe people’s care needs both throughout the service’s care plans and while the provider and senior members of staff were talking to inspectors. Where people had withdrawn their consent for planned care monitoring tasks these choices were not respected, and people told us they had been made to feel uncomfortable about their decisions by senior staff.

The service did not provide person centred care focused on people’s individual needs. These needs had not been effectively assessed before people moved in and there were no systems in place to assess the compatibility of people’s needs before they moved into the service.

Risks were not managed appropriately, and staff had not been provided with necessary guidance or training on how to support people if they became anxious or distressed. People’s medicines were not managed safely.

Staff had not completed all training deemed necessary by the provider and regular supervision had not been provided. Disclosure and Barring Service checks had been completed but improvements were needed in the service’s recruitment practices.

Staffing arrangements reflected staff preferences instead of people’s needs and current staffing levels meant people were not normally supported while accessing the community. Support to participate in activities did not reflect people’s interests.

The provider’s quality assurance systems were ineffective and required notification had not been submitted. The registered manager had been absent for some time and a deputy manager had been recently asked to take on responsibility for overseeing the service.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection and update

This service was registered with us on 11 November 2022 and this is the first inspection. The service has now been rated overall as Inadequate.

Why we inspected

The inspection was prompted in part due to concerns received about the quality of care and support being provided by the service. A decision was made for us to inspect and complete a comprehensive inspection to examine those risks and provide a rating for the service.

Enforcement and Recommendations

We have identified breaches in relation to person centred care, risk and medicines management, safeguarding, dignity and respect, governance, and staffing.

As a result of the severity of issues identified during this inspection information was shared with the local authorities safeguarding service at the draft report stage. This enabled the local authority to provide immediate support and guidance to the service.

We have also recommended the provider seeks advice on safe recruitment practices, and the management of kitchen risks and supporting people’s nutritional needs.

Follow up

We will request an action plan from the provider to understand what they will do to improve the standards of quality and safety. We will work alongside the provider and local authority to monitor progress. We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service, which will help inform when we next inspect.

Special Measures

The overall rating for this service is ‘Inadequate’ and the service is therefore in ‘special measures’. This means we will keep the service under review and, if we do not propose to cancel the provider’s registration, we will re-inspect within 6 months to check for significant improvements.

If the provider has not made enough improvement within this timeframe and there is still a rating of inadequate for any key question or overall rating, we will take action in line with our enforcement procedures. This will mean we will begin the process of preventing the provider from operating this service. This will usually lead to cancellation of their registration or to varying the conditions the registration.