• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Affinity Trust - Domicilary Care Agency - West Midlands

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Flat 7, Parrys Court, Woodside Place, Cannock, WS11 4AA (0121) 553 3502

Provided and run by:
Affinity Trust

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Affinity Trust - Domicilary Care Agency - West Midlands on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Affinity Trust - Domicilary Care Agency - West Midlands, you can give feedback on this service.

10 September 2019

During a routine inspection

About the service

Affinity Trust - West Midlands provides personal care and support to people with learning and physical disabilities who live independently in the community. 98 people used the service at the time of our inspection, 53 of these received personal care. People either lived on their own or with other people.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

The service has been developed and designed in line with the principles and values that underpin Registering the Right Support and other best practice guidance. This ensures that people who use the service can live as full a life as possible and achieve the best possible outcomes. The principles reflect the need for people with learning disabilities and/or autism to live meaningful lives that include control, choice, and independence. People using the service receive planned and co-ordinated person-centred support that is appropriate and inclusive for them.

Overall people received safe and effective care and support. Recent medication errors were being proactively managed to reduce risks. Risks were assessed and managed to enable people to live independent lives. Staff were vigilant to identify risks and take action to ensure people remained safe.

People received support from a consistent staff team who they had helped to recruit. Staff received training relevant to their role and overall had good support from senior managers and colleagues.

People’s needs were assessed and documented to ensure their care needs were met. Care plans were detailed and effective to ensure staff always had access to the most current information. Plans were reviewed regularly as people’s needs changed.

People received appropriate support to eat, drink and prepare meals. People were supported to access healthcare, and other agencies, when required. Staff worked in partnership with health and social care professionals to ensure consistency and ensure people received appropriate and safe support.

Staff were caring and respectful, promoting people’s privacy, dignity and independence.

Staff sought people’s consent before supporting them and decisions about people’s care and treatment were made in line with law and guidance

People’s care was responsive to their changing needs. People, and their relatives, were involved in the assessment and planning of their care this joint working meant people’s needs were met fully. People knew how to raise a concern and always felt listened to. Information was available in different formats to make it accessible.

People felt the service was well managed. People, and staff, had regular opportunities to share their views about the service. Overall staff felt well supported and usually listened to when they shared feedback. The provider carried out audits to ensure the quality of care provided and created an ethos of learning from mistakes and constantly improving

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Why we inspected:

This was a scheduled inspection based on the previous rating.

Rating at last inspection

The last rating for this service was good (published July 2016).

Follow up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.

23 May 2016

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on the 23 and 24 May 2016 and was announced. This was the first inspection since this service was registered in July 2014. Affinity Trust provides personal care and support to people with learning and physical disabilities who live independently in the community. 38 people used the service at the time of our inspection. People either lived on their own or with other people.

A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run. The service has a manager in post who has submitted an application to the Care Quality Commission to become the registered manager. The previous registered manager left in October 2015.

People received a safe service, procedures were in place to reduce the risk of harm to people. Staff were trained and knew how to report and deal with issues regarding people’s safety. People received their medicines as prescribed and safe systems were in place to manage people’s medicines. Staff were recruited in a safe way which ensured they were of a good character to work with people who used this service.

Risk assessments and care plans had been developed with the involvement of people. Staff had the relevant information about how to minimise identified risks to ensure people were supported in a safe way. People had equipment in place when this was needed, so that staff could assist them safely.

The manager understood their responsibility to comply with the requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS). Staff knew about people’s individual capacity to make decisions and supported them to make their own decisions.

People received care from staff that were respectful and caring and ensured that people’s privacy and dignity was maintained. People were supported to maintain good health; we saw that staff alerted health care professionals if they had any concerns about their health. People had someone they could talk to if they were not happy about the service they received.

We had not received all of the information relating to incidents that the provider must notify us about. Arrangements were in place to assess and monitor the quality of the services, so that actions could be put in place to drive improvement.