• Care Home
  • Care home

Station House

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Victoria Avenue, Crewe, Cheshire, CW2 7SF (01270) 250843

Provided and run by:
Community Health Services Limited

Important:

This care home is run by two companies: Care UK Care Services Limited and Community Health Services Limited. These two companies have a dual registration and are jointly responsible for the services at the home.

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Our current view of the service

Good

Updated 7 November 2025

Date of assessment: 18 December 2025 to 15 January 2026. Station House is a care home providing personal and nursing care for up to 71 people. The home supports younger and older people with physical disabilities, learning disabilities and mental health conditions some are living with dementia. At the time of the inspection 67 people were living at Station House. The assessment was prompted due to information of concern received regarding the quality and safety of the service. Station House has 2 registered providers meaning both legal entities are responsible for this service.

We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed autistic people and people with a learning disability respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. At the time of the assessment, the service was not supporting any autistic people or people with a learning disability where this was their presenting need, but the provider had regard to ‘Right support, right care, right culture’.

The provider had systems in place to monitor the safety and quality of the service. However, they had not identified all the issues we highlighted during our inspection. The registered manager was experienced, knowledgeable and responsive to our feedback.

Staff assessed potential risks to people, and took actions to mitigate these, however some records needed to be more robust. A range of environmental checks were undertaken. The management team took some action in relation to the nurse call bell system; as there had been some occasional issues with its functioning. Overall, the management team ensured any safeguarding concerns were reported in line with local procedures.

The provider had identified staff were not always working in line with the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005 and were taking action to improve this.

Feedback indicated there were enough staff to support people safely. Staff undertook induction and ongoing training. Where we identified some training gaps the registered manager took some immediate actions to provide this. Staff were positive, felt supported in their roles and were encouraged to progress at Station House. We noted some improvements were required in relation to staff usage of PPE, which the management team addressed straight away.

Staff developed care plans from initial assessments. The management team had been working with staff to improve the quality and consistency of the care plans. Staff effectively monitored people’s clinical needs and referred people for assessment and input from other professionals where necessary. The management team worked in partnership with others and promoted a learning culture.

People's experience of the service

Updated 7 November 2025

Overall, people were positive about the care and support they received at Station House. People commented. “Staff look after me very well, they make sure I eat my meals, help me to wash and dress” and “I haven’t found anyone not willing to help. They will support my wishes.” Where people had raised any concerns or complaints, the management team listened and responded. There was a positive culture where people’s wishes and preferences were respected. Staff supported people to make choices and their care plans included information to promote independence where possible. People's feedback was gathered through various means including meetings. There was a ‘Resident of the day’ system in place, where staff reviewed people’s care plans monthly. Whilst records showed some people had been consulted with as part of this, several people said they were unaware of these reviews. There was an activity team, who offered various activities, entertainment and outings to people. Ensuring people were offered meaningful activities, was an area the management team were focused on strengthening. We saw examples of people being supported in a person-centred way. We noted the dining areas were small and felt cramped. The provider had already undertaken some refurbishment and further refurbishment was planned. Overall people were satisfied with the food on offer; some recent changes had been made to the menu following feedback.