• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Newcastle Community Care Services DCA

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

First Floor, Park View House, Front Street, Long Benton, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, NE7 7TZ 0333 321 8292

Provided and run by:
Mears Homecare Limited

Important: This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile

All Inspections

17, 19, 20 and 25 February and 2 March 2015

During a routine inspection

The unannounced inspection took place on 17, 19, 20 and 25 February and 2 March 2015. We last inspected the service 28 January 2014 when we found the service was meeting all the regulations that we inspected.

At the time of our inspection, Newcastle Community Care Services DCA provided home care and housing support for 513 adults and children living in their own homes, which meant staff made over 6000 visits a week to support these people. These figures will fluctuate due to the nature of the service.

The service had a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

We considered people were not fully protected against the risks associated with medicines because information was not always in place to manage ‘as required’ medicines.

We found risk assessments required improvement in the way they were written and the terminology used.

There were safeguarding policies and procedures in place. Staff knew what actions they would take if abuse was suspected. The provider had dealt with previous safeguarding concerns appropriately.

Accidents and incidents were recorded and dealt with effectively by the provider. Where issues (including complaints) had occurred, actions had been taken and lessons learnt.

Staffing levels were maintained by timely and safe recruitment procedures. The provider had a new system in place to ensure rota allocations were monitored so people received their care ‘call’ on time and staff were kept safe. The registered manager told us they tried to ensure people were visited by the same care staff but that was not always possible due to sickness or holidays.

Staff had received a 12 week induction and completed appropriate training. Where gaps in training had been identified, the provider ensured staff received additional training, for example, in dysphasia or dementia. Staff said they felt supported by their line manager and the provider.

The registered manager was fully aware of the Mental Capacity Act 2005, particularly in relation to the court of protection and lasting power of attorney. There were policies and procedures in place and staff had been trained. Where people required the support of an advocate, staff had helped to secure their services.

Some people received support with eating and drinking as part of their care package. People were provided with meals they had chosen and preferred and staff ensured drinks were left between visits for people if they required them.

Staff promoted people’s independence and treated people with warmth and kindness in a respectful and dignified manner. People’s likes and dislikes had been recorded and staff knew the people they supported. Care plans and associated documents were built around the person and involved them, their family and professionals.

There was a complaints procedure in place and people and their relatives knew how to access and use it.

The service was well led with a dedicated registered manager in place, who was committed to providing a good service and had implemented various quality checks to monitor this.

28, 29, 30 January and 4, 5, 11 February 2014

During a routine inspection

Care and support was being provided to over 800 people living in seven local authority areas. We visited and spoke with 11 people in their own homes in five of the local authority areas served by the provider. We also spoke with the relatives of four people who used the service. We sent out 61 questionnaires to people. A total of 22 questionnaires were returned. In addition, our expert by experience spoke with 20 people by phone to find out their opinions of the service.

Overall, people and their relatives were very satisfied with the service being provided. Their comments included, 'The carers are fantastic' and 'I have lovely carers who are brilliant.' We found that care and treatment was planned and delivered in a way that was intended to ensure people's safety and welfare. We found appropriate arrangements were in place to manage medicines and provide people with support to be able to eat and drink sufficient amounts to meet their needs.

Appropriate checks were undertaken before staff began work. People were very complimentary about the staff themselves. We found that there were enough qualified, skilled and experienced staff to meet people's needs.

The provider had an effective system in place to identify, assess and manage risks to the health, safety and welfare of people who used the service and others. At the time of our inspection the provider did not have a registered manager in post.

7, 8 November 2012

During a routine inspection

During this inspection we visited three people using the service and had telephone contact with another seven people who were using the service to find out their opinions of the service. We also spoke with five staff.

We found that before people received any care or treatment they were asked for their consent and the provider acted in accordance with their wishes. People told us they received a reliable service that met their care and support needs, although a number said they would like to be informed of any change of care worker before they arrive. They told us they were listened to and their views respected. Their comments included, 'I'm satisfied with them. They won't let me down. They're very caring,' and 'They're perfect, lovely.'

We found that people were protected from unsafe or unsuitable equipment because the provider carried out checks to make sure equipment used in people's homes, when providing their care, met safety standards and that staff we trained to use the equipment safely. We found that staff were given thorough induction and ongoing training that ensured they could meet the needs of people they supported.

People were made aware of the complaints system. Their comments and complaints were listened to and acted on.

25 January 2011

During a routine inspection

People spoken to said the carers are very good. They are trained and polite and courteous. They always stay their allocated time and don't leave early. Sometimes they are late and the agency doesn't let us know when different carers are coming. Our regular carers know what care and support is required but carers covering for holidays and sickness don't know what is required and they don't have time to read the care plan. One person said 'I couldn't survive at home without my carers.' Spot checks are carried out by the agency to audit the care given by the carers. People spoken to knew who to contact if they needed to make a complaint.