• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Bluebird Care (Worthing)

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Unit 1, The Azure Suite, Churchill Court, Rustington, West Sussex, BN16 3DA (01903) 730026

Provided and run by:
Scoona Ltd

Important: This service is now registered at a different address - see new profile
Important: This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile

All Inspections

17 March 2016

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 17 and 18 March 2016 and was announced. The provider was given 48 hours’ notice because the location provides a domiciliary care service; we needed to be sure that someone would be in.

Bluebird Care (Worthing) is a domiciliary care agency located in Rustington, West Sussex. It provides personal care to 54 people in their own homes, 53 of whom are aged 65 years and over. They include 11 people living with dementia, two people living with a sensory impairment and three people with a physical disability.

The service had a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the service is run.

This is the first inspection of the location since it was registered with the Care Quality Commission in May 2014.

According to its brochure, the ethos of the provider was to provide a, ‘Good old fashioned service with a “can do” attitude.” People who used the service and their relatives spoke highly of the care they received. One person told us, “I would recommend them because I am satisfied with the service they provide.” Another person said, “The care workers are caring. They do go the extra mile, especially with the little things! They contact me regularly to keep me ‘in the loop’ and to make sure things run smoothly.”

The culture of the service was ‘open.’ People and relatives were able to raise any issues directly with the management and were assured of a quick response. Carealso felt able to raise any concerns.

People received a safe service. Risks to people’s safety were assessed and reviewed. People and relatives had confidence in the care workers who supported them. Care workers received training to enable them to deliver effective care. They were supported in their roles and professional development by a system of supervision and appraisal.

The CQC monitors the operation of the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005. The service had policies and procedures regarding the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS). People were able to determine the care they received and the registered manager understood how consent should be considered in line with the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

Care workers supported people to prepare meals and to eat and drink if required. They ensured people at risk of malnutrition received adequate nutrition and hydration.

The service worked with community professionals to ensure people’s health needs were met and that they had the necessary equipment to support them in their independence and to maintain their safety.

People and relatives were involved in planning their care and were supported to be as independent as they were able.

The service had systems in place to allocate calls and to ensure consistency of care workers so that they people understood their people’s and knew how they wished to be supported.

The provider had an appropriate system in place to monitor and review the service provided, taking into account the views of people and their relatives. They were also able demonstrate how this information had been used to improve the quality and safety of the service.