• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Meadow Court

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

157 Barley Lane, Ilford, Essex, IG3 8XJ (020) 8548 3580

Provided and run by:
Care UK Community Partnerships Ltd

All Inspections

14 August 2016

During an inspection looking at part of the service

At the last inspection on 19 and 20 March 2015 we found a breach of regulation and some areas which required improvement. Following the inspection the provider wrote to us to say what they would do to meet legal requirements in relation to the staffing level available to provide care and support to people using the service.

We undertook this focused inspection to check that they had met legal requirements and to confirm that they had followed their action plan and made improvements to the service. This report only covers our findings in relation to those requirements. You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection, by selecting the 'all reports' link for Meadow Court on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.

Meadow Court is a care home with nursing divided in to five separate units known as clusters. The service is registered to accommodate a maximum of 70 people. At the time of the inspection there were 29 people using the service and one person was in hospital.

The service had a registered manager in place. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People using the service and relatives told us there were enough staff to meet people’s needs. People told us staff were kind and responded promptly to their needs when they needed support. We observed staff were available to assist people with their meals and provide people with the care they needed. Staff told us that the staffing levels were sufficient at the home and reflected the needs of people. People and relatives were concerned about the changes being implemented in the deployment of staff. We recommended that the registered manager refers to best practices of management of change.

We noted that the service had various policies and procedures including adult safeguarding and whistle blowing. People’s care files also showed that care plans and risk assessments were regularly reviewed. Staff were aware of the provider's policies and had received training in areas such as moving and handling, infection control and medicine administration. We also noted that there was a good staff recruitment process in place. This showed that people were supported by staff who were appropriately checked and were suitable to provide safe care.

People told us staff administered their medicines. We found that medicines were administered and recorded by staff as prescribed by healthcare professionals. We also noted that all parts of the premises were clean and free from unpleasant odours. This ensured that any possible incidents of infections were controlled appropriately by staff.

19 and 20 March 2015

During a routine inspection

This unannounced inspection took place on 19 and 20 March 2015. The service met all of the regulations we inspected against at our last inspection on 16 January 2014.

Meadow Court is a care home with nursing divided in to five separate units known as clusters. The service is registered to accommodate a maximum of 70 people. At the time of the inspection there were 39 people using the service.  The registered manager told us that  one of the units (which could accommodate 12 people) had been closed due to a lack of new admissions. The home had 19 vacancies. We noted that the home did not always have enough staff to meet people’s needs. However, we noted people were happy living at the home because staff were experienced and supported to ensure people privacy and dignity was respected and their needs met.

The service had a registered manager in place. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

We found that there were not enough staff deployed at the home. For example, we saw some people had to wait for staff to finish helping others before they could be supported with their meals. We observed that staff who were on a one-to-one support to people were doing other tasks and were not present with them all the time. This showed that people were at risk because there were not enough staff. You can see what action we have told the provider to take at the back of the full version of this report.

We reviewed care files and noted that people were involved in planning of their care and were actively encouraged to do so. People told us they felt safe and were respected by staff. They also told us that they were happy living at the home. 

Staff had good knowledge, support and experience to provide care to people. Staff received regular supervision and training. Records we saw and staff told us they had attended training in various areas relevant to their roles. We observed staff were friendly and kind when supporting and interacting with people. Staff ensured people’s privacy and dignity by giving them choice of, for example, what to wear and how to be supported, and by knocking on bedroom doors before entering rooms. 

Staff were appropriately vetted before they were employed. This ensured that people were supported by staff who were checked regarding their suitability, knowledge and experience to deliver care. 

People had access to healthcare services and received ongoing healthcare support. For example, people had healthcare checks and attended appointments with opticians and dentists. Referrals were also made to other healthcare professionals when and as needed.  The home had policies and procedures in relation to the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards. The Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS) are part of the Mental Capacity Act 2005. They aim to make sure that people in care homes, hospitals and supported living are looked after in a way that does not deprive them of their liberty and ensures that people are supported to make decisions relating to the care they receive.

16 January 2014

During a routine inspection

We looked around all of the units, known as clusters, at the home. We observed lunch-time care on two of the clusters and general care on the others as we undertook the inspection.

During our observation we saw that people were treated with care and respect. We saw staff as they provided help at the meal-time. There was a care worker available to assist each person that required help with feeding. The deputy manager told us that one to one care was very important in the home. We spoke to three relatives of people who lived at the home. One relative said that staff were "brilliant."

We saw that there were plenty of activities available at the home for people to take part in. We saw that people were able to choose the activity that they enjoyed the most. Staff and relatives if people who used the service told us that the home was run like a large family. We found that staff worked in partnership with the people who used the service and their relatives so that people could live as independently as possible.

There were enough qualified, skilled and experienced staff to meet people's needs. Staff levels were flexible and increased if anyone who used the service needed one to one care.

People who used the service, staff and visitors were protected against the risks of unsafe or unsuitable premises. One person said they "loved looking at the garden." We saw that the outside areas of the home were very well maintained.

20 November 2012

During a routine inspection

This visit was an inspection of Heather Cluster, a unit within Meadow Court for people with care needs that focus on physical disability and/or cognitive impairment.

People told us that staff were friendly and that they worked hard. We were told that people were cared for. One relative said, 'I think he's lucky to be here. I've been to a number of them and this one is very good. I think the care is good'. Another relative said their relative experienced mixed standards that were good overall but the care could vary depending on the carer: 'If he has the right people with him he's alright. It can depend on who gets him ready in the morning and if staff have done it in a rushed way. Others do it quickly but in a caring way.'

30 August 2012

During a themed inspection looking at Dignity and Nutrition

People told us what it was like to live at the home and described how they were treated by staff and involved in making choices about their care. They also told us about the quality and choice of food and drink available. This was because this inspection was part of a themed inspection programme to assess whether older people living in care homes are treated with dignity and respect and whether their nutritional needs were met.

The inspection team was led by a Care Quality Commission (CQC) inspector joined by an Expert by Experience who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of service and a practising professional.

People who use the service and their relatives were positive about Meadow Court. People told us that the home met their needs with regard to dignity and nutrition. One person told us that they felt some parts of the environment needed improvement but what was more important was the good care that staff showed and gave to people. Another person told us, 'this place has been a life line for our family. My mother can sleep knowing that my father is well looked after'.