• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames - 26 Egerton Road Respite Care Service

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

26 Egerton Road, Twickenham, Middlesex, TW2 7SP (020) 8891 6308

Provided and run by:
London Borough of Richmond upon Thames

All Inspections

04 to 05 February 2015

During a routine inspection

This was an unannounced inspection over two days and took place on 4 and 5 February 2015.

The home provides respite care and accommodation for up to six people with learning disabilities. It is located in the Twickenham area.

The home had a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

In September 2013, our inspection found that the service met the regulations we inspected against.

At this inspection the home met the regulations. People and their relatives told us they were very happy living at the home and with the service provided. People could continue to pursue the activities that they would do when living at home, felt safe and the staff team provided the care and support they needed.

The home provided an atmosphere that was enjoyable, light and it was a nice place to stay.

The records were comprehensive and kept up to date.

The home was well maintained, furnished, clean and enabled people to do what they wished. It provided a safe environment for people to live and work in.

The staff we spoke with were very knowledgeable about the field they worked in, had appropriate skills and training and knew people and their carers well. They also understood people’s needs. Their knowledge was used to provide care and support focussed on the individual, in a professional, friendly and supportive way.

People were enabled to do the activities they did at home as well as joining in other activities that were group and individual based. People and their relatives said they followed their usual routines and were supported to do so. There was lots of smiling, laughter and good natured banter between people using the service and staff during our visit.

We looked at care plans that contained clearly recorded, fully completed, and regularly reviewed information that enabled staff to perform their duties to a good standard.

People and their relatives were encouraged to discuss their health needs with staff and had access to community based health professionals, during their stay in the same way they would at home.

People were protected from nutrition and hydration associated risks with balanced diets that also met their likes, dislikes and preferences. Relatives spoke positively about the choice and quality of food available.

The staff were well trained, knowledgeable, professional and accessible to people using the service and their relatives. Staff said they had access to good training, support and career advancement.

Relatives said the management team at the home, were approachable, responsive, encouraged feedback from people and consistently monitored and assessed the quality of the service provided.

We contacted two health care professionals to get their views.

19 September 2013

During a routine inspection

During our visit due to communication difficulties the conversations we had with people using the service did not relate to the outcomes we inspected. Some of our findings were based upon the care we observed and people's reactions to it.

We spoke to relatives who told us "They do a marvellous job, we can't fault the care".

We saw that that people were treated with dignity and respect. There was also a thorough needs assessment process that the home followed before people stayed at the service.

The records we saw including care plans and risk assessments were up to date, regularly reviewed and staff provided care in a supportive, patient and friendly way.

The care and support provided showed us that staff were competent, well trained and there were enough of them to provide the service people required to meet people's needs. They enabled and encouraged people to make their own decisions, choices and made sure they followed routines and attended activities that they would do if at home. A relative told us "If we didn't have respite I couldn't cope".

We saw the premises were fit for purpose, well decorated and maintained.

The complaints procedure was that of Richmond Borough Council and available in pictorial form in the home to make it easier to understand.

2 October 2012

During a routine inspection

During our visit due to communication difficulties the conversations we had with some people using the service did not relate to the outcomes we inspected. Some of our findings were based upon the care we observed and people's reactions to it. We used the Short Observational Framework for Inspection (SOFI). SOFI is a specific way of observing care to help us understand the experience of people who could not talk with us. Our observations showed that people were treated with dignity and

respect. The staff were friendly, supportive and there were adequate numbers to meet people's needs. They enabled and encouraged people to make their own decisions and choices and made sure they followed routines and attended activities that they would do if they were at home. A relative said "this is a brilliant service and staff really go the extra mile". One person told us "I have a freedom pass and went to look at my old school today with an old school friend then bought a new jumper it was a good deal". People we spoke to felt safe and protected by the staff team. We saw staff dealing with challenging behaviour and situations in a professional way that kept everyone safe.

People told us "I enjoy staying here, it gives my family a break". They also said "I have been using this service for five years".

28 September 2011

During a routine inspection

People who use the service told us that they were happy with the service. They said that the staff were kind and caring. We saw that the staff were supportive and understanding. They offered people choices and showed them respect.