• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: London Borough of Richmond upon Thames - 3 Tudor Avenue Residential Care Home

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

3 Tudor Avenue, Hampton, Middlesex, TW12 2ND (020) 8979 2696

Provided and run by:
London Borough of Richmond upon Thames

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

21 September 2015

During a routine inspection

We carried out an inspection of 3 Tudor Avenue on 21 September 2015. The inspection was unannounced. At the previous inspection of 17 October 2013 the home had met all the required standards.

3 Tudor Avenue is a home for up to six people who have learning disabilities, some of whom have additional physical disabilies. At the time of our inspection there were six people living in the home.

The home had a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People who lived at the home were protected from the risk of abuse happening to them. People who were able to told us they felt safe and well cared for at the service and that they felt comfortable with the staff. Other people were able to demonstrate through their body language and interaction with staff that they felt safe and well cared for.

We saw that people’s health and nutrition were regularly monitored. There were well established links with GP services and other community health services such as occupational therapists, dieticians and speech and language therapists.

Care records were individual to each person and contained information about people’s life history, their likes and dislikes, and information which would be helpful to hospitals or other health support services.

Staffing levels were managed flexibly to suit people's needs so that people received their care when they needed it. Staff had access to information, support and training that they needed to do their jobs well. The provider’s training programme was designed to meet the needs of people using the service so that staff had the knowledge and skills they required to care for people effectively.

There was an open and inclusive atmosphere in the service. People who used the service and staff told us they found the manager to be approachable and supportive. Staff were able to challenge when they felt there could be improvements.

The provider carried out regular audits to monitor the quality of the service and to plan improvements. Action plans were used so the provider could monitor whether necessary changes were made.

17 October 2013

During a routine inspection

During our visit due to communication difficulties we spoke briefly with people using the service and did not obtain their views regarding the outcomes we looked at. Instead our judgements were made based upon the care and support we saw staff provided to people who used the service, the views of two family members we spoke with and documented records. Family of people who used the service told us that they were happy with the care provided at the home. Comments included, 'Really well looked after'.

We saw that people's cultural and religious beliefs were recorded and taken in to account as part of the care planning process. Care plans were person centred and documented each person's history and support needs. Appropriate arrangements were in place in relation to the recording of medication administration and staff undertook managing medication training as part of a rolling mandatory programme. There were enough qualified, skilled and experienced staff to meet people's needs. No complaints had been recorded during the last two year period.

8 December 2011

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out this inspection to look at the improvements the organisation had made to the way they supported people with their medicines. We met some of the people who live at the home but did not speak to them about their experiences on this occasion.

When we visited in October 2011 we met everyone who lives at the home. Some people told us that they were happy there and that they had the support they wanted and needed. Other people could not communicate verbally. However, we saw that the staff were kind, supportive and responded to their needs.

18 October 2011

During a routine inspection

We met everyone who lives at the home. Some people told us they were happy there and had the support they wanted and needed. Other people could not communicate verbally. However, we saw that the staff were kind, supportive and responded to their needs.