• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Gozone Care

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

53-55 High Street, Billingshurst, West Sussex, RH14 9PP (01403) 783582

Provided and run by:
Gozone Care Limited

Important: This service is now registered at a different address - see new profile

All Inspections

19 and 23 January 2015

During a routine inspection

This inspection took place on 19 and 23 January 2015 and was announced.

At the last inspection on 8 January 2014, we asked the provider to take action to make improvements in the way that medicines were managed, and this action has been completed.

Gozone care is a domiciliary care service that covers West Sussex. There are four area teams, in Chichester, Billingshurst, Petworth and Pulborough. The agency supports older people, people living with dementia, people with a physical, learning or sensory impairment and those with mental health conditions. They also provide palliative care. At the time of our visit, they were supporting 139 people with personal care. The majority of the people they support are older people, most of whom are privately funded.

The service had a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

The agency’s philosophy of care is, ‘As a family run care agency that encourages freedom of choice and independence, we believe that everyone has the right to enjoy life. We take the time to understand your needs, your likes and dislikes and what makes you tick’. We found that this was people’s experience and that the culture of the agency was open and friendly.

People spoke highly of the support that they received. One said, “They’re absolutely brilliant, I can’t think of one thing to say against them. They have a cracker group of girls there”. Another told us, “We’re very pleased. The carer (male) we’ve got is top of the tree”. They told us that they had confidence in the ability of the staff who supported them. People were involved in planning and reviewing their care and felt that staff listened to them and understood how they liked to be supported.

People felt safe. There were enough staff employed and the rotas were managed effectively. People were usually able to make changes to their call times or durations to suit their needs. Risks to people’s safety were assessed and reviewed. Staff understood local safeguarding procedures. They were able to speak about the action they would take if they were concerned that someone was at risk of abuse. People received their medicines safely and at the right time.

People were treated with kindness and respect. They were each supported by a small team of care workers which meant that they developed good relationships with them. Where people had not felt at ease with the staff supporting them, the registered manager had made changes to the rota to accommodate this. We observed that people got along well with their care workers and were relaxed in their company.

People, their representatives and staff were asked for their views on how the service was run and were invited to make any suggestions for improvement. Ideas and concerns had been acted upon and complaints had been responded to appropriately.

The registered manager had a system to monitor and review the quality of care delivered. This included spot checks on staff as they supported people, gathering feedback via surveys and reviewing records of the care delivered. As the business was growing, the registered manager was making changes to the staffing structure to support this and help ensure that people received safe and appropriate care. One member of staff told us, “It’s the best company I’ve worked for. They really care about people and staff”.

8 January 2014

During a routine inspection

We spoke with 21 people who use the service, two on the day of our visit and 19 by telephone afterwards. We also spoke with the relatives of 13 people who were unable to tell us directly about their experience.

People that we spoke with were very satisfied with the support they received. They told us that the service was very good. One said, 'I'm very happy with the service, they're excellent'. Another told us, 'They're very kind, very helpful, the carers are splendid and the people in the office are good too'. A few people told us that they were not always informed if their care worker was running late. One said, 'The quality of care is fantastic, the timing issues can always be better'.

Relatives that we spoke with were equally complimentary. One said, 'They are really nice people, they are professionals'. Another told us, 'They are very helpful, always cheerful and nothing is too much trouble'. One gave an example of a carer cutting fresh roses from the garden for their relative to enjoy when they were unable to get outside. They said, 'We are very pleased with the quality and the kindness'.

We spoke with the six care workers, three members of staff in the office and the manager. Care workers told us that they felt supported. One said, 'It's the best company I've worked for so far, I think it is because it's a family business they care about the staff and clients'. Another told us, 'It's a nice company to work for'.

We found that people experienced safe and effective care based on detailed care plans and risk assessments that documented their preferences and met individual needs. The interactions between care workers and people that we observed were positive. People were offered choices about the care that they received and support was provided in a kind and respectful manner. The agency sought people's views and acted on their feedback.

We, however, that the agency did not have appropriate arrangements to monitor the management of medicines and that action was needed to improve how medicines, especially controlled drugs, were recorded.

25 February 2013

During a routine inspection

During our visit we spoke with three members of staff and we observed staff talking with people who used the service. We also spoke with people that used the service and their family members, one person told us "we are very satisfied with the service."

We made observations throughout the visit and saw people being offered choices as to when they wished to be visited. We saw people being addressed in a respectful manner. We looked at peoples individual care plans and saw that the information recorded enabled staff to plan and deliver the required level of care and support on an individual basis.

We saw that regular audits of the service were completed by the provider ensuring that people who used the service benefit from a service that monitors the quality of care that people received.

Staff told us that they had received regular training and that they felt that they were supported to carry out their roles and meet the needs of people who used the service.

People that used the service told us "I would rate the service as first class" and "you can rely on the carers they are very punctual."

24 October 2011

During a routine inspection

We spoke with a relative on the telephone who told us that the family are very happy with care offered. We were told the care workers arrive on time and are polite and caring.

Staff spoken with told us the agency is a supportive place to work and they are trained to offer a good service.