• Hospital
  • Independent hospital

Turner Diagnostic Centre

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Colchester General Hospital, Turner Road, Colchester, Essex, CO4 5JL (01206) 744222

Provided and run by:
Alliance Medical Limited

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Turner Diagnostic Centre on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Turner Diagnostic Centre, you can give feedback on this service.

3 July 2019 and 9 July 2019

During a routine inspection

Turner Diagnostic Centre is operated by Alliance Medical Limited. The service offers a range of diagnostic imaging procedures. Facilities include two magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners and a positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET-CT) scanner. Magnetic resonance imaging is a type of scan using magnetic fields and radio waves to produce detailed images of the body. Positron emission tomography–computed tomography uses radioactive material to obtain detailed images of the body to aid diagnosis of disease.

The service provides a diagnostic imaging service for patients aged 17 years and over who required a CT or PET-CT scan and MRI scanning (offered for patients aged 0+ years). We inspected diagnostic imaging.

We inspected this service using our comprehensive inspection methodology. We carried out the unannounced part of the inspection on 3 July 2019, along with a short notice announced visit to the centre on 9 July 2019 when a PET-CT clinic was in progress.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we ask the same five questions of all services: are they safe, effective, caring, responsive to people's needs, and well-led? Where we have a legal duty to do so we rate services’ performance against each key question as outstanding, good, requires improvement or inadequate.

Throughout the inspection, we took account of what people told us and how the provider understood and complied with the Mental Capacity Act 2005.

The only service provided by this centre was diagnostic and screening procedures.

Services we rate

This is the first time we have rated this service. We rated it as Good overall.

We found good practice in relation to diagnostic imaging:

  • The service provided mandatory training to staff. Staff demonstrated compliance with mandatory training compliance rates.
  • Staff understood and could describe actions to take to protect patients from abuse.
  • The service controlled infection risk well.
  • Staff completed and updated risk assessments for each patient.
  • The service had enough staff with the right qualification to keep patients safe.
  • Patient medical records were securely stored and accessible in a timely manner.
  • The service reported and managed patient safety incidents well.
  • The service provided care based on national guidance.
  • Staff treated patients with compassion and kindness, whilst respecting their privacy and dignity.
  • The service was planned and delivered in a way that met the needs of local people. People could access the service when they needed it.
  • Leaders had the integrity, skills and abilities to run the service.
  • The service had a vision for what it wanted to achieve and a strategy to turn it in to action.
  • Staff felt respected, supported and valued. There was an open culture at the service.
  • Leaders operated effective governance processes and worked collaboratively with other organisations.

However, we also found:

  • Staff lacked knowledge around the meaning of the duty of candour.

Following this inspection, we told the provider that it should make three improvements, even though a regulation had not been breached, to help the service improve. Details are at the end of the report.

Heidi Smoult

Deputy Chief Inspector of Hospitals

19 November 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with three relatives who accompanied people for their scans. We were unable to speak with people as they were being scanned throughout the duration of our inspection; however we did observe their care. Relatives told us that staff were kind and supportive. One person told us, 'The whole process has been really quick, we have no complaints.'

We saw that people had been provided with information about their scan and that any questions had been answered before they consented to the procedure. We saw that each person went through a safety checklist prior to being scanned which ensured their safety and welfare.

The service had a comment and feedback box for people to provide feedback on the service to help them improve. The people we spoke with said they felt listened to and were happy with the service provided. We examined the recruitment procedures for staff employed by the service and found that staff were appropriately skilled and qualified to undertake their roles.

The registered manager was not present on the day of our inspection; however the staff we spoke with were clear about procedures and were able to assist us. We spoke with the registered manager after the inspection had been carried out and obtained some additional information. The way in which information was provided during and after the inspection showed that there was good leadership and understanding of roles and functions within the service.

30 August 2012

During a routine inspection

We spoke with two people who had received an MRI (Magnetic Resonance Image) on the day of our visit.

They were both very complimentary about the service they had received. They told us that staff had treated them with dignity and respect and that staff were very helpful and kind to them. They both said that they were very anxious beforehand, about the unknown, but staff had provided them with all the relevant information that helped them to understand what was going on throughout the procedure.

They said that they had received information about the procedure in a way that they understood which enabled them to give an informed consent. They also said that they knew that they could stop the procedure at any time if absolutely necessary but were fully aware of the risks in doing so.

They both said that they were put at ease and reassured by the radiographer who communicated with them throughout the procedure, through the two way intercom, asking if they were alright and advising them of the time left.