Archived: Mid Cornwall

Unit 2B, Whitegate Ind Est, St Dennis, St Austell, Cornwall, PL26 8DW (01726) 824611

Provided and run by:
Oasis Community Care Ltd

All Inspections

1, 2, 20 August 2013

During a routine inspection

The agency provided 942.5 hours of personal care services and employed 47 care workers. We looked at the care records for six people. We visited those people in their homes and spoke with five relatives. We spoke with five care workers, the agency's office staff, and the registered manager, Mrs Karon Gunter.

People who used the service told us that their care workers were always pleasant, friendly, reliable, and respected their privacy and dignity. Care workers were described as "very polite", "respectful" and "good as gold". People told us [the care workers] "do anything for me", "timekeeping fairly good if late they will call me" and "majority are brilliant some are really into their jobs".

People told us they were involved in an assessment of their individual needs and the plan of how those needs were to be met. Care plans and records were reviewed and updated. People told us the care workers were very good at their work.

The care workers told us that the support from the management team enabled them to do their work well. We found training was being rolled out to all staff to ensure they were up to date. We also found "spot checks" took place and one to one supervisions were being set up.

Oasis Community Care relocated its office to Bodmin in June 2013. At the time of this inspection the address of the office in St Austell was still registered as a location with the Care Quality Commission and therefore is the provider's location address on this report.

14, 22, 27 February and 7 March 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke with nine people. Everyone was satisfied they were respected by the way in which they were treated, they received the care and support they expected, and were consulted about how their care should be provided and delivered. Most people were satisfied they received continuity of care because they saw the same care workers.

We found care plans held comprehensive instructions for practical tasks. For people with memory loss or confusion however, there was no instruction about how to provide their care and manage their behaviour. This meant staff did not know what signs to look for, or how to respond at an early stage to intervene and prevent behaviours happening or recurring.

We found people using this service were not protected from the risk of abuse because staff did not know how to identify the possibility of abuse and prevent it from happening. The manager did not know how to take appropriate action when possible abuse was identified.

We found the agency's recruitment procedures were inconsistent, and staff had not received training and supervision relevant to the work they were undertaking.

We found there were no systems to assess and monitor the service that people received, or to identify, assess and manage risks to people's health, safety and welfare.

We found that important events affecting people's welfare, health and safety were not reported to the Care Quality Commission so that, where needed, action could be taken.

25 October 2011

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out this review to find out how the service had improved since we had last visited, when we had served two warning notices. We had had concerns that there were not enough staff and visits were being missed. Also, we were concerned that staff were not being properly recruited.

At this review the people we visited in their own homes told us that there had been improvements with the care. People said that visits were no longer missed, however staff were on occasions late. People told us that when they had raised concerns someone had listened and apologised.

People told us that individual carers were 'very nice', though there was some worries that people did not know who would be visiting.

25 October 2011

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out this review to find out how the service had improved since we had last visited, when we had served two warning notices. We had had concerns that there were not enough staff and visits were being missed. Also, we were concerned that staff were not being properly recruited.

At this review the people we visited in their own homes told us that there had been improvements with the care. People said that visits were no longer missed, however staff were on occasions late. People told us that when they had raised concerns someone had listened and apologised.

People told us that individual carers were 'very nice', though there was some worries that people did not know who would be visiting.

2 September 2011

During an inspection in response to concerns

This review was carried out because we had received anonymous concerns that staff were working without proper recruitment checks being completed, and without the necessary skills. We were also told of concerns that visits were not happening as they should, but that staff were being told to "flit in and out", so that they could get to all the visits.

19 July 2011

During an inspection in response to concerns

The people who use the service told us that they were generally happy with the individual carers who visited them. Some people had raised concerns about particular carers but it was not clear what happened as a result of this. Some of the people we visited had experience of missed visits, where carers failed to show up at all. Other people had experience of having to wait hours for carers or having many different carers. The information we saw in the telephone message book showed that there was a serious problem across the organisation.

We found that the information about people's care needs was very poor and for some people non existent, and so care staff would have very little information about what help people needed, particularly where people had communication problems. Where there were care plans, the information about help needed with medication was sometimes inaccurate.

People who use the service had expressed concerns about the number of different staff who might come to visit them. We found that recruitment checks were not completed before people started work.

One person who uses the service expressed the view that the office is a shambles. We found that records were missing or not available. Serious concerns were not being addressed and the people running the organisation had very limited experience of care work. Calls made to the service out of hours were not being answered. The Registered Manager had left at the beginning of the year.