• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Palm Tree Home Care Limited

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

79 Upper Manor Road, Paignton, Devon, TQ3 2TH 07900 571239

Provided and run by:
Palm Tree Home Care Limited

All Inspections

3 May 2023

During an inspection looking at part of the service

About the service

Palm Tree Home Care Limited is a domiciliary care service, supporting adults in the community who require assistance with personal care. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do, we also consider any wider social care provided. At the time of our inspection there were 77 people receiving personal care.

People's experience of using this service and what we found

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice. People felt safe and supported by staff in their homes. Comments included, “[Person’s name] is incredibly happy with Palm Tree. Their usual carer is very professional and caring and never makes them feel rushed. They were nervous about having care, but the carers put their mind at rest. There is a high standard of care from everyone” and “It’s like having a good reliable friend that comes to visit. You look forward to seeing them and you know they will always do their best. They even sit and chat afterwards if they have time – that means a lot.”

Staff demonstrated an understanding of what might constitute abuse and knew how to report any concerns they might have.

People's individual risks were identified, and risk assessment reviews were carried out to identify ways to keep people safe.

Medicines were managed as necessary.

Effective infection control measures were in place.

People confirmed that staffing arrangements met their needs. They were happy with staff timekeeping and confirmed they always stayed the allotted time. Staffing arrangements matched the support commissioned and staff skills were integral to this to suit people's needs. Where a person's needs increased or decreased, staffing was adjusted accordingly.

There were effective staff recruitment and selection processes in place. People received effective care and support from a regular, small team of staff who were well trained and competent.

Care files were personalised to reflect people's personal preferences. Their views and suggestions were taken into account to improve the service.

Health and social care professionals were regularly involved in people's care to ensure they received the care and treatment which was right for them.

Staff and management relationships with people were caring and supportive. Staff provided care that was kind and compassionate.

Staff spoke positively about communication and how the registered manager worked well with them, valuing their work and encouraging their professional development.

A number of methods were used to assess the quality and safety of the service people received. The service made continuous improvements in response to their findings.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

The last rating for this service was Good (published 27 January 2018).

Why we inspected

This inspection was prompted by a review of the information we held about this service and length of time since the last inspection. We looked at infection prevention and control measures under the Safe key question. We look at this in all care home inspections even if no concerns or risks have been identified. This is to provide assurance that the service can respond to COVID-19 and other infection outbreaks effectively.

Follow up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service, which will help inform when we next inspect.

12 December 2017

During a routine inspection

This announced inspection took place on 12 and 13 December 2017. We visited the office on 12 December 2017 and carried out phone calls to people who used the service and their relatives on 13 December 2017.

Palm Tree Home Care Limited is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own houses and flats in the community. It provides a service to younger and older adults. Not everyone using the service receives regulated activity; CQC only inspects the service being received by people provided with ‘personal care’; help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also take into account any wider social care provided. At the time of this inspection 43 people were receiving personal care from the service. People who use the service live in Paignton and Torquay.

At the last inspection, the service was rated Good overall. At this inspection, we found the service remained Good and had improved to an outstanding rating for caring.

Why the service is rated good:

People received a safe service. One person said “Totally safe, I have no worries.” A relative said “Living at a distance it gave me great peace of mind to know she was in safe and understanding hands.” People told us they felt safe and comfortable when staff were in their home and when they received care. Staff knew how to recognise signs of potential abuse and understood how to report any concerns in line with the service's safeguarding policy. Risks had been appropriately assessed and staff had been provided with clear guidance on the management of identified risks. People were protected from the risks associated with unsafe medicine administration because medicines were managed safely.

People received effective care because staff had the skills and knowledge required to support them. People commented, “They’re a good group of carers” and “Very efficient and well trained”. A community professional said, “I have met a couple of staff who have appeared to be professional, helpful and proactive.” Staff monitored people's healthcare needs and advice and support was sought from healthcare professionals when needed.

Staff provided a very caring service to people. We heard many examples of how staff went over and above their responsibilities, in their own time, to support people and their families. Without exception, we received excellent feedback from people who used the service, their relatives and representatives. Comments included, “They’re excellent”, “I’d put a gold star against them”, and “I’d give them A*, always willing to go that extra mile.” People benefited from small, regular staff teams who they had built strong relationships with over time. People and their relatives said, “They’re marvellous and very caring” and “They always send the same staff. She knows them, they’re like family to her.”

People received personalised care which was delivered in accordance with their wishes and lifestyle. People’s communication needs were met. The service was complying with the Accessible Information Standard (AIS). The AIS applies to people using the service who have information and communication needs relating to a disability, impairment or sensory loss. For example, one person was unable to communicate verbally. Staff told us they understood what the person wanted through facial expressions. The person’s representative told us they were happy with the way staff communicated with them. This ensured the person was able to communicate with staff and their needs were met in the way they wanted.

The service was well led. People and staff told us the management team were open and approachable. People told us “They’re absolutely brilliant”, “I can’t praise them enough” and “I don’t know what I’d do without them.” Staff said “They’ve been amazing”, “They’re always on the end of the phone” and “I love working for them.” The manager and provider sought people's views, listened to them and used suggestions to make improvements. The manager and provider had monitoring systems which enabled them to identify good practice and areas of improvement.

Further information is in the detailed findings below.

27 October 2015

During a routine inspection

Palm Tree Home Care Limited provides care and support to mostly older people, who live in their own homes. The services provided include personal care and domestic work in Paignton and Torquay.

The provider of the service also worked as the registered manager in day to day charge of the service. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

We visited the office on 27 October 2015. At the time of this announced inspection 37 people were using the service. This service was registered in May 2014 and this was the first inspection.

People and their relatives were positive about the way staff treated them. Each person we spoke with told us their care workers were kind and compassionate. Comments included “We’ve seen a significant improvement in the care since Palm Tree took over”; “They’re (staff) all lovely, always so caring”; “We feel so much better with their support, we’re so glad we’ve got them”. People told us staff never rushed them and always checked whether they could do anything else to support them. People were happy and relaxed when we visited them in their homes. Staff treated people with respect and kindness. People responded to this by smiling and engaging with staff in a friendly way.

People and their relatives told us they felt safe when they received care. People told us ‘I feel safe, I know the staff” and “There’s nothing to worry about”. We saw that staff ensured people had their pendent alarm on in case they needed to summon help. People told us staff were careful to ensure their homes were secured on leaving.

People had a regular team of staff who had the appropriate skills to meet their needs. Comments included “I have regular staff who go above and beyond. They take initiative, if anything needs doing, they do it”; “They co-ordinate what’s needed”; “We have a committed and skilful care worker” and “They know where everything is”.

People told us staff were usually on time. One person said “They can’t help it if they get delayed with the person before”. Staff told us they had enough time to travel between visits. One staff member said “I only have to travel for five to ten minutes as my round is close together”.

Staff knew people well and were able to tell us how they supported people. During a home visit, we saw staff responded to people’s requests and met their needs appropriately. People told us they received support that was personalised to their needs. Staff were aware some people were at risk of becoming socially isolated. One staff member said “When people don’t have any family at all, we may be the only person they see that day. It’s nice we can spend time and chat”. One person told us “I look forward to them coming, it gives me a purpose”.

Safe staff recruitment procedures were in place. This helped reduce the risk of the provider employing a person who may be a risk to vulnerable people. People were protected by staff who had completed safeguarding training and knew what to do if they were concerned that a person was being abused. Where the agency had been involved in a safeguarding process, this had been well managed. A healthcare professional told us the service supported the person throughout the process and handled it very sensitively.

Risk assessments had been undertaken and included information about action to be taken to minimise the chance of harm occurring to people and staff. Where people were supported to have their medicines this was done safely. People had received their medicines as they had been prescribed by their doctor to promote good health.

People told us the registered manager knew them well and often spoke with them or visited them. The registered manager was working towards the Level 5 Diploma in Leadership and management. A healthcare professional told us the registered manager was very good at communicating with them. Staff told us the registered manager and seniors were very approachable. Comments included “Any problems we can go straight to them”; “(The registered manager) provides brilliant support” ; and “When I had a personal emergency, they came straight out and supported me. They 100% care”.

People and their relatives felt able to raise concerns or make a complaint if the need arose. However, everyone we spoke with told us they had no complaints. Comments included “No complaints whatsoever” and “If there’s ever a problem I can ring them and it’s sorted straight away”.

The provider had systems in place to assess and monitor the quality of care. The service encouraged feedback and used this to drive improvements. Monthly reviews showed people were asked about the quality of the service. A quality assurance survey was sent to people in August 2015. The service received 25 responses. All of these people said they were ‘happy’ or ‘very happy’ with the care and support they received. Some people were not sure if they had been involved in their care plan. The registered manager responded to people and offered to go out and meet with them.

The registered manager was keen to improve the service. They were able to describe the improvements they planned to make in the next 12 months in the provider information return. When we asked people, relatives and staff what could be improved, no one was able to suggest anything. Comments included “It’s all perfect as far as I’m concerned”; “I think they’re doing really well”; “It couldn’t be better” and “I can’t fault them”.