• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: North Tyneside Home Care Associates Limited

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

Town Mission, Lower Rudyerd Street, North Shields, Tyne and Wear, NE29 6NG (0191) 257 5449

Provided and run by:
North Tyneside Homecare Associates Limited

Important: This service is now registered at a different address - see new profile

All Inspections

19, 21, 22 and 27 May 2015

During a routine inspection

The announced inspection took place on 19, 21, 22 and 27 May 2015. We last inspected the service in March 2014 when we found the service was meeting all the regulations that we inspected.

At the time of our inspection, North Tyneside Home Care Associates Limited provided home care and housing support for 260 adults living in their own homes within the North Tyneside area. These figures will fluctuate due to the nature of the service. The service is part of a larger employee owned domiciliary provider spread across mostly the North of England known as CASA (Care & Share Associated Limited) and the service is locally known as CASA.

The service had a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

We considered people were not fully protected against the risks associated with medicines because associated care plans and risk assessments were not always in place and reviewed regularly. We also found people’s care records in need of further improvements.

The provider had dealt with previous safeguarding concerns appropriately. There were safeguarding policies and procedures in place. Staff knew what actions they would take if abuse was suspected.

Accidents and incidents were recorded and monitored by the registered manager and the provider to help them identify any trends. We saw that accidents had been recorded and dealt with appropriately.

The registered manager told us they tried to ensure people were visited by the same care staff but that was not always possible due to sickness or holidays. Staffing levels were maintained by timely and safe recruitment procedures.

Staff had received an induction and completed a programme of training. Staff said they felt supported by their line manager and the provider.

The registered manager was fully aware of the Mental Capacity Act 2005, particularly in relation to the court of protection There were policies and procedures in place and staff had been trained.

People were provided with meals and drinks they had chosen and preferred if that was part of their identified need.

People were treated with respect and dignity and staff were kind and considerate.

A complaints procedure was in place and people and their relatives knew how to access it and who they needed to talk to should this be required.

The service had a management team in place. Expertise was used in the service from the clinical lead for example when this was required.

We found one breach in relation to Regulation 17 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. This related to record keeping and governance. You can see what action we told the provider to take at the back of the full version of this report.

3, 4 March 2014

During a routine inspection

In this report the name of a registered manager appears who was not in post at the time of the inspection. Their name appears because they were still a registered manager on our register at the time. The person currently managing the service is in the process of formally registering with the Commission.

We looked at 10 care records of people who used the service, visited four people in their homes and our expert by experience interviewed 21 people over the telephone about the care they received. People told us that the service had improved in the last few months, although there were still times that regular carers did not always visit. People who used the service told us, 'They are guys who I like and trust and that is important', 'I am very happy with the service provided. There is nothing they could do to make it better.' People our expert by experience spoke with told us, 'Delighted with the service, it is very flexible and the carers are good at what they do'; 'The carers are very pleasant and are careful to protect my dignity when they are washing and dressing me.'

The deputy manager told us that there had been a concerted effort to recruit staff over the past few months. She said that they currently had a rolling advert in the local paper to try and recruit staff into the service. Two relatives told our expert by experience they had had problems with timekeeping and carers not turning up. They each had made a complaint and met with a manager and said that the situation had improved. One person told our expert by experience, 'I am very happy with the carers but they are always pushed to the limit.'

People we spoke with told us that overall they were happy with the staff. They said that staff were not usually late or if they were then they were made aware that things were running late. People told us, 'They always tell me if they might be a bit late, but I know they are always going to turn up' and 'They have never been late or not turned up. They always turn up.'

The deputy manager told us that since the previous inspection she had now introduced a system to ensure that any comments or concerns were brought to her attention. We looked at the provider's formal complaints records. We noted that there was a record of the nature of the complaint, evidence that the complaint had been fully investigated and a record of the response to the person who had complained.

2, 3, 28 October 2013

During a routine inspection

In this report the name of a registered manager appears who was not in post at the time of the inspection. Their name appears because they were still a registered manager on our register at the time.

Care and treatment was not always planned and delivered in a way that was intended to ensure people's safety and welfare. One person Said, 'When X (regular carer) doesn't come I always have to ring up and ask them to send somebody. It means that I don't get a shower.'

We found that staff worked with other professionals to ensure that care was delivered in a coordinated way.

There were not always enough qualified, skilled and experienced staff to meet people's needs. People told us, 'Girls at weekends, never regular people, are late and usually rushed' and 'The girls get calls all the time asking them to fit in other calls.'

We found staff were supported to gain appropriate qualifications and provided with training to effectively undertake their work.

People's complaints were not always fully resolved, where possible, to their satisfaction. Comments received included, 'I rang once because a carer told him (relative) to stay in bed. They said someone would ring back but they never did' and 'I rang them once. They said someone would be there shortly but they never did. I never heard from them.'

People's care records and staff personal records were maintained and updated regularly. Records were kept securely and could be located promptly when needed.

5 December 2012

During a routine inspection

We spoke with four people about the care and support they received from this service. People told us they were happy with the service, and with staff. People said, 'I love the girls, they treat me like a person and I can have a laugh with them' and 'They're mainly good, they're good carers.' Other comments included, 'They get me up in the morning, they help me get showered and they get the doctor if I need it; they're brilliant' and 'They ask me what help I want.'

We viewed care records for six people. We found that care needs were assessed, planned and delivered in a way which met people's individual needs. We found that people had knowledge of, and had consented to, their care plans.

We found there were appropriate arrangements in place to assist people with their medication in a safe and suitable manner.

Whilst a comprehensive induction was given to new staff, we found that long standing members of staff were not always supported or developed in their roles.

We found the provider had systems in place to assess and monitor the quality of the service. People told us they felt comfortable discussing any concerns they had with the manager or with staff, and most people told us their concerns were always acted upon.

17 January 2012

During an inspection in response to concerns

"The carers are excellent, I have no complaints. If I did have any concerns I know who to contact."

" I find the carers flexible and they are very helpful and polite."

"I usually have the same carers but I know in holiday time I may have different carers."