• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Orchard Lea

Orchard Way, Cullompton, Devon, EX15 1EJ (01884) 33375

Provided and run by:
Devon County Council

All Inspections

9 January 2014

During a routine inspection

At the time of this inspection there were 18 people living at Orchard Lea. We spent time talking in detail to nine people about their experiences of living at the home. We heard from one person who said about the home ''It's clearly one of the best''. Another person told us ''I don't have to do anything I don't want to' I can just stay in my room and read my paper''. We spoke with six staff including the manager, care staff and domestic staff. We heard how people and staff felt their views were listened to in making decisions about the quality of care and support provided. We looked at the care records of four people and found information was kept up to date and reflected changing needs. We heard from one visiting healthcare professional that staff monitored people's healthcare needs well.

We saw care and support was well planned and delivered by a staff group who understood the needs and wishes of the people they cared for. The environment was well maintained and kept clean to a high standard. Systems were in place to ensure the environment was kept safe for people and staff who worked there.

There were robust medication systems in place and sufficient staff to meet the needs of people who lived at the home.

We found the service compliant with all six outcomes we inspected

11 January 2013

During an inspection looking at part of the service

During an inspection in August 2012 we found that the provider was failing to meet a number of the essential standards of quality and safety. We issued a number of compliance actions in order to ensure that the necessary improvements were made. The focus of this inspection was to review the action taken by the provider to meet the compliance actions.

During this inspection we spoke with six people living at the home, three visiting professionals and seven staff members, including the registered manager and the resource manager.

People living at the home told us they were happy with the care and support they received. Their comments included, 'I am being cared for very well', 'The care is second to none' and 'The staff are lovely and can't do enough for you'. Visiting professionals told us that the home worked well with them and that their recommendations were implemented.

We found that overall improvements had been achieved. Care and treatment was planned and delivered in a way that was intended to ensure people's safety and welfare. Opportunities for people to enjoy activities and meaningful occupation were improving to ensure sufficient stimulation was available to meet their social, psychological and emotional needs. Work was also commencing to improve the environment.

We found that improvements to the arrangements for obtaining consent had been made although inconsistencies remained. We will meet with the provider to discuss this in the near future.

22 August 2012

During a routine inspection

There were 21 people living at the home on the day of this inspection. We met or saw all of the people living at the home and we spoke with six people in depth to hear their experience of living at Orchard Lea. People told us that in the main they were satisfied with the care and support they received. People told us that routines were flexible enabling them to direct the daily care they received. People spoke highly of the staff telling us that staff were polite, respectful and friendly. On the whole people told us they liked the food and that they were always offered a choice.

All of the people spoken with knew how to raise any concerns or complaints and they were confident that they would be listened to. Comments from people living at Orchard Lea included; 'Life here is alright', 'staff understand and know me', 'Staff are always thoughtful', 'I can't fault the staff' and 'Everyone here is very nice'.

An area highlighted for improvement by people we spoke with was activities. There was no activities programme in place. We saw that there was little stimulation or social activity for people to engage with. People told us that staff were 'very busy' and had little time to spend chatting with them. One person told us, 'They are there if I need them. I don't like to bother them'. Another person said, 'They put things on for us now and again but I get bored here'.

We spoke with one relative and three visiting health professionals during this inspection. A relative told us that they were happy with the care provided to their family member, comments included, 'The staff are friendly and they understand X. We have no worries'. Three visiting professionals told us that the service works well with them. Their comments included, 'The staff are courteous and they are always available to assist and provide relevant information', 'Staff follow our instructions and requests' and 'Staff recognise problems and refer to us appropriately'.

As part of the planned review external stakeholders were also contacted prior to our inspection so they could contribute. We contacted a manager at Devon County Council along with requests for information from other interested parties such as the community nursing team. Professionals told us they had no current concerns about the service. The community nursing service told us that the service worked well with them, that they were alerted to people's changing needs and that any recommended interventions were acted upon.

During this inspection we found concerns relating to how the service manages some issues relating to consent to care and treatment. We found that some people's care was not adequately planned and some staff delivering care were unsure of the interventions needed to meet people's needs. Staffing levels were not sufficient to ensure that people were having sufficient social stimulation to ensure their psychological and emotional needs were being met.

We also found that the environment was not fully meeting people's diverse needs and preferences. Although improvements needed relating to the environment had been highlighted by the internal audit, no action had been taken to address the majority of the issues and improve the overall environment for people living at the home.

31 January 2011

During a routine inspection

People told us they were happy with the care they receive and that they found the staff easy to converse with. Nobody we spoke with living at the home told us that they had concerns about living there. One person said that they were happier now then 12 months previously because of improved management at the home. People told us that staffing vacancies and the use of agency staff caused some concern that staff might be unfamiliar with their care needs. However, we found that the management was doing all that it could to minimise this impact.