• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Birchdale Care Home

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

Moore Street, Old Sunderland Road, Gateshead, Tyne and Wear, NE8 3PN (0191) 477 6777

Provided and run by:
Four Seasons Health Care (England) Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

26 November 2014

During a routine inspection

This was an unannounced inspection carried out on 26 November 2014.

We last inspected Birchdale in April 2013. At that inspection we found the service was meeting all its legal requirements.

Birchdale Care Home provides accommodation for up to 63 people who need support with their personal and health care. The home mainly provides support for older people many who are living with dementia. The home also provides general nursing support to some people. The home is a large, purpose built property. Accommodation is arranged over three floors and there is a passenger lift to assist people to get to the upper and lower floor. The home has 63 single bedrooms all with an en-suite facility. There were 26 people living at the home at the time of our inspection.

There was a registered manager in place, however the registered manager was not available at the time of inspection. A temporary manager was running the home. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are “registered persons”. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

Although people said they felt safe and they could speak to staff. Comments included; “Safe, yes, the staff are so nice to me and pleasant.” Another person commented; “I feel very safe and if I was not happy I would let them know.” We found there were not always enough staff on duty to provide individual care and support to people and to keep them safe as staffing levels were not maintained.

People were protected as staff had received training about safeguarding and knew how to respond to any allegation of abuse. When new staff were appointed thorough vetting checks were carried out to make sure they were suitable to work with people who needed care and support.

The necessary checks were carried out to ensure the building was safe and fit for purpose.

Staff knew people’s care and support needs but detailed care plans were not in place to help staff provide care to people in they wanted. They were also not available to give staff guidance to provide consistent care to people who displayed distressed behaviour. Information was not available for all people with regard to individual preferences, likes and dislikes. We found records did not all accurately reflect people’s care and support needs.

People said staff were kind and caring. Comments included; “Staff are very pleasant and helpful.” “The carers are very pleasant.” “Staff keep me up to date with the care and; “If I want anything doing they will do it.” Staff responded patiently to people’s requests for assistance. They spoke warmly to people and noticed when people needed any help.

Menus were varied and a choice was offered at each mealtime. Staff were sensitive when assisting people with their meals and the catering staff provided special diets which some people required.

Birchdale was meeting the requirements of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DoLS). Staff had received training and had a good understanding of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) and Best Interest Decision Making, when people were unable to make decisions themselves. Staff were provided with other opportunities to receive training to meet people’s care needs.

People had access to health care professionals to make sure they received appropriate care and treatment. Staff followed advice given by professionals to make sure people received the treatment they needed. People received their medicines in a safe and timely way.

People had the opportunity to give their views about the service. There was regular consultation with people and their family members and their views were used to improve the service. A complaints procedure was available. People told us they would feel confident to speak to staff about any concerns if they needed to. The provider undertook a range of audits to check on the quality of care provided.

We found two breaches of the Health and Social Care Act 2008(Regulated Activities) Regulations 2010 in relation to staffing levels and records.

You can see what action we told the provider to take at the back of the full version of the report.

9 April 2013

During a routine inspection

We found that people were asked to give their consent before any care was delivered and that procedures were in place where there were doubts about a person's capacity to make decisions. People who used the service told us the staff were good and always asked them for their permission before delivering care. Family members told us staff kept them up to date about their relative's wellbeing.

We found that people had their needs assessed when they moved into the home and this linked to a range of personalised care plans. Family members commented; 'A very high standard of care is provided by staff' and 'Staff are fantastic.'

We found the provider had systems in place to ensure that medication was handled appropriately. We saw that staff who administered medication were trained in the safe use of medicines and had their competency assessed regularly.

Staff told us they were well supported and had opportunities for further development which included health and social care related qualifications and specialist training.

We saw the provider undertook a range of audits to ensure that standards were maintained and improved. People who used the service and their families told us they were aware of the complaints process, knew how to complain and would feel comfortable raising any concerns they had.

We found the provider had taken action to ensure that records which related to assessing the risk of nutrition were accurate, complete and consistent.

11 January 2013

During an inspection looking at part of the service

Family members told us they had no concerns about their relative's care. They said they knew about their relative's care plans and were involved in developing them. One family member commented, 'The care is excellent, carers are good and people are well cared for.' We saw the home was in the process of being refurbished, for example the home had been completely redecorated, worn carpets had been replaced with new flooring and new furniture and bed linen had been purchased.

We observed people being assisted over the lunchtime and saw examples of positive interaction from staff, for example staff chatted with people, provided prompts for each spoonful of food and offered napkins to ensure that people were kept clean.

We observed staff helping people, particularly over lunchtime, and saw staff responding to people's needs in the lounge area. Family members commented, 'I just have to ask and staff will happily offer help,' and 'If you need anything you just have to ask, staff are fantastic.'

We found assessments relating to the risk of poor nutrition and associated care records were inaccurate and incomplete and therefore did not protect people from the risk of unsafe or inappropriate care.

4 September 2012

During a themed inspection looking at Dignity and Nutrition

People told us what it was like to live at this home and described how they were

treated by staff and their involvement in making choices about their care. They

also told us about the quality and choice of food and drink available. This was

because this inspection was part of a themed inspection programme to assess

whether older people living in care homes are treated with dignity and respect

and whether their nutritional needs are met.

The inspection team was led by a CQC inspector joined by a practising professional and an expert by experience.