• Care Home
  • Care home

Archived: Abbeymoor Neurodisability Centre

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Market Lane, Swalwell, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, NE16 3DZ (0191) 488 0899

Provided and run by:
Four Seasons Health Care (England) Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

9 and 10 November 2015

During a routine inspection

This was an unannounced inspection which took place over two days on 9 and 10 November 2015. The service was last inspected in February 2014 and was compliant with the regulations in force at that time.

Abbeymoor Neurodisability Centre provides cares for up to forty people with complex neurological conditions. There are a number of people living there who have Huntingdon’s disease. It provides accommodation for persons who require nursing or personal care, diagnostic and screening procedures and treatment of disease, disorder or injury. There were 38 people living at the home at the time of inspection.

There was a registered manager who had been in post five years. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People told us they felt safe living at the service and that staff knew how to act to keep them safe from harm. The building had some areas which were in need of repair and these were resolved during our inspection or actions agreed.

There were enough staff to meet people’s often complex needs and the staff were trained, supervised and supported to meet their needs. Staff we spoke with felt supported by the registered manager and senior staff team.

Medicines were mostly managed well by the staff and people received the help they needed to take them safely. Some records of the medicine storage areas needed to be improved. Where people’s needs changed the staff sought medical advice and encouraged people to maintain their well-being and independence.

People were supported by staff who knew their needs well and how best to support them. They were aware of individual’s choices and preferences and knew how to support those people who no longer had the capacity to make decisions for themselves. Families felt the service was effective and offered them reassurance that their relatives were being cared for.

People were supported to maintain a suitable food and fluid intake. Staff responded flexibly to ensure that people maintained their physical well-being and worked with people as individuals. Where decisions had to be made about people’s care, families and external professionals were involved and consulted as part of the process.

Staff were caring and valued the people they worked with. Staff showed kindness and empathy in dealing with people’s needs. Families felt their relatives were cared for by a staff team who valued them and would keep them safe.

People’s privacy and dignity were carefully considered by the staff team, who ensured that their choices and previous wishes and lifestyles were respected. The service was willing to challenge where they felt a person’s best interests were being overlooked or ignored by others.

People who were receiving end of life care had their needs appropriately assessed and met by effective multi-agency collaboration, co-ordinated by the service. Professional advice was sought where needed to promote advanced care planning if required.

The service responded to people’s needs as they changed over time, sometimes responding to emergencies. The service supported people to access appropriate support so the staff could keep them safe and well.

The registered manager led by example, supporting staff to consider the best ways to meet people’s needs and develop the service. The registered manager regularly consulted people, families and staff and looked for ways to improve the service through audits and regular reviews of care delivery.

13 November 2013

During an inspection looking at part of the service

The provider had made some progress since our last inspection to improve the quality of nutritional assessments. However, we still found that assessments contained inaccurate or incomplete information. We found care plan audits had been done consistently for most people but had not been effective in identifying gaps in care records.

2 July 2013

During a routine inspection

We found people were asked to give their consent before care was delivered. They told us they were able to make choices and gave examples of decisions they made every day. The provider had systems in place where there were doubts about a person's mental capacity to make decisions.

We found people had their needs assessed and the assessments were used to develop personalised care plans. People told us about college courses they were attending and staff gave examples of activities people were involved in.

People said they felt there were enough staff and that it was easy to get the nurse's attention if they needed to.

People who used the service and staff had opportunities to express their views through regular meetings. We found care plan audits were not carried out consistently and were ineffective in identifying and dealing with gaps in care delivery.

We found people's records were kept securely and information we requested was readily available. However, care records relating to the risk of poor nutrition were incomplete and inaccurate.

21 May 2012

During a routine inspection

People who used the service and their relatives told us they were very happy with the service provided by the staff. They said staff spoke to them well and listened to their queries appropriately; they also said that staff responded to any questions or queries, promptly and politely.

They said they had been asked about any help they needed when they started to use the service and that they were regularly consulted about any changes to their care.

People we spoke with said they were aware that they had a care plan and also confirmed that any changes in their care had been discussed with them and their relatives where possible. We were told that the food was 'good' and that there was 'enough to eat'.

People we spoke with said they were confident that staff would address any concerns as soon as possible and they knew who to go to if they had any issues to discuss. They said they had been given a copy of the complaints procedure and that they would feel able to use it.

9 February 2012

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out this review to assess the progress following a review that was carried out August 2011. A visit was undertaken as part of the process 9 February 2012 starting at 09:30 and ending at 16:30.

We spent time with the people living in the service and some of their relatives and we asked them their views about the home. During the visit we also spoke with the manager and the staff.

The people living in the service and the visitors we met were very complimentary about the way that the home was managed and the way people were supported. They were, without exception, complimentary about the manager, and the staff.

One person told us that they were confident that their relative was safe and that they would know what to do if they were worried about anything.

11 August 2011

During an inspection in response to concerns

People using the service praised staff and the support they received. Their comments included, 'They look after me properly here'; 'Yes, I'm well cared for', and a person described a staff member as 'one in a million'.

A relative we spoke with said, 'I'm very happy with my wife's care and she has settled well at the home'. Another relative told us that staff kept her involved and informed about her family member's welfare. She described staff as 'marvellous' and said, 'The medical care is exceptional'.

One lady we spoke with told us how at times she became upset and could challenge other people. She said staff had recommended that on these occasions she should spend some time in her bedroom, away from others. She described this as being an effective way to help her to calm down.

The relatives we met with said they were aware of recent media attention regarding safeguarding issues at the home. They told us they had no complaints about their family members care and treatment. The relative of one person said they had visited the home on a daily basis for a number of years and had no doubts about their family member's safety. Comments from relatives included, 'I wouldn't hesitate to take matters further if I had any concerns', and, 'I have no problems with how my wife is treated by staff'.