• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Kalyan Ashram

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

245 Walford Road, Spark Brook, Birmingham, West Midlands, B11 1QJ (0121) 256 1406

Provided and run by:
Ashram Housing Association Limited

Important: This service is now registered at a different address - see new profile

All Inspections

09 July 2014

During a routine inspection

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider is meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and to pilot a new inspection process being introduced by CQC which looks at the overall quality of the service.

The inspection was announced two days before we visited the service. Giving notice ensured we got to meet and speak with as many of the people using the service and the staff that support them as possible. This meant we were able to get their direct feedback about the service.

Kalyan Ashram is a complex of 24 individual flats and bed sits. This was a specialist service providing support to people of the Asian community who may require help because of dementia, old age, physical disability, sensory impairment, mental ill health or learning disability. People had their own tenancy agreement for the accommodation they occupied. At the time of our inspection seven of the 24 tenants were receiving help with their personal care. There was a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service and has the legal responsibility for meeting the requirements of the law; as does the provider

The service was last inspected in January 2014 and at that time we found it was compliant and meeting the needs of the people using the service.

We found that people were receiving a good level of care and support from Kalyan Ashram. People told us they liked being supported by staff who understood their language, culture and faith.

We found that people were safe and being protected from the risk of harm. People told us they felt safe. We found that the manager had systems in place that would identify risks to people’s safety. Staff we spoke with told us the service would pass the “mum test.” That meant they would be happy for a relative of theirs to use the service.

People told us they liked and trusted the staff, some of whom had worked at Kalyan Ashram for many years. Staff we spoke with had in depth knowledge about people’s care needs, and were also able to tell us about people’s life history and friends and family who were important to each person.

People told us they liked the independence that the service enabled them to maintain. People told us  that the service was flexible and the times and lengths of calls could be adapted to meet people’s individual needs

The manager of Kalyan Ashram had worked at the service for several years and had got to know people’s needs well over that time. People told us the manager was approachable and supportive. People using the service had opportunities to get involved in the running and development of the service. This included attending focus groups, completing questionnaires and by approaching the staff or the manager directly.  

16 January 2014

During a routine inspection

We visited the office of Kalyan Ashram (the service) on 16 January 2014. We gave them short notice of our visit. We spoke with the manager and the care coordinator and two care staff on this day. We also spoke with a social worker linked with the service following our visit. The service was providing a personal care service for seven out of the 14 people living in the extra care sheltered housing scheme (the scheme) at the time of our inspection.

The expert by experience, who accompanied us, spoke with six people who used the personal care service and two of their relatives. He also spoke with three other people who lived in the scheme who wanted to speak with him. All of the people he spoke with were happy about the care and support they received. Amongst their comments were: "Not a single day have I been unhappy" and 'I have no complaint about the care workers, and I am quite happy here.' The social worker told us: "The care people receive is person centred and brilliant. We have been working with the service to ensure that their records support the care that is being provided."

There were good infection control systems in place: care staff had access to appropriate equipment and procedures were in place to lessen the possibility of the transfer of infection. A relative told us: "The care staff wear protective equipment (gloves and aprons) and throw it in the bin (afterwards)."

Care staff told us and their employment records confirmed that staff had their performance checked and received regular supervision, support and training to help them care for people appropriately.

We had received no complaints about the service. There were systems in place to consult with people that lived in the scheme regularly and the provider also asked tenants of the scheme their views on a yearly basis.

5 March 2013

During a routine inspection

We visited the service on 05 March 2013 and we gathered evidence of people's experiences through speaking with two people who use the service. We spoke with two members of staff who supported the people we spoke with about their experiences. An interpreter supported the inspection visit to gather people's views on the service who did not speak English.

People we spoke with told us that the care received matched the care that was discussed with them. They told us that they were involved in planning the care and that reviews were held to reassess their needs. We saw that people and family members had provided information on their care plan.

We saw that the care plans were person centred and reflected people's needs. This meant that the care plan was based on the needs of the person. We saw that people's needs were reassessed and where necessary the care plan was updated. We saw that people's likes and dislikes were clear within their care plans.

People we spoke with told us that staff were friendly and supportive. We saw there were regular members of care staff who provided people's personal care. Continuity of staff should mean that people receive their care consistently as staff have an increased understanding of people's needs.

We spoke with staff about what they thought abuse was and they showed they had a good awareness of the importance of keeping people safe. They understood their responsibilities for reporting any concerns regarding abuse.

14 November 2011

During a routine inspection

People told us they were happy with the support they received and that it made a difference to their everyday living. People told us that they were treated with respect and that care staff maintained their privacy and dignity. They told us that care staff completed the care and support required.

People we spoke with were confident that they could raise concerns if they were not happy with the care being received and that they would be listened to.