Archived: Pax Hill Residential Home EMF Unit

Pax Hill, Bentley, Farnham, Hampshire, GU10 5NG (01420) 525890

Provided and run by:
Dr M Zaki & Dr N Zaki

Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

During a check to make sure that the improvements required had been made

When we last inspected Paxhill Residential EMF Unit we found that staff received a good induction and good training. We found however that staff were not receiving formal supervision in line with the provider's supervision policy. Instead staff practice was observed regularly by the manager and staff were given verbal feedback on their practice. This meant however that there was no formal record that the supervision had actually taken place or of the issues that arose.

Since the inspection the provider has ensured that their policy has been implemented and that staff have received formal supervision. There is also a schedule for future staff supervisions.

3 December 2012

During a routine inspection

We spoke with people who used the service who told us 'the care is very good' we also spoke with people's relatives who said they were 'very happy' and that they 'were lucky to find it'.

We also observed the care provided. We saw that people were treated with dignity and respect. They were given choices by the carer staff and their wishes were respected. Relatives also told us that staff were 'kind and considerate'

We found that people and their representatives had been involved in the care planning process. We spoke with relatives who told us that they had seen the care plan and were 'impressed with it'. They also informed us that they had signed the care plan on behalf of their relative.

We saw that the care plans and risk assessments were comprehensive and gave clear instructions to the carer staff regarding the provision of care to people.

We found that people were safeguarded against the risk of abuse.

We reviewed staff records and saw that staff received an induction programme and were able to access a range of training. We found that the manager was providing staff with practical supervision; however the supervision process was not recorded in line with the provider's policy.

We found that the manager was auditing the quality of the service and had sent out a quality assurance survey. They also sought informal feedback from people who used the service and their relatives. We were told by relatives that the manager sought their feedback regularly.

23 February 2011

During a routine inspection

People who used the home told us they were happy with the quality of care they received, the home in general, their accommodation, the activities available, the staff and the standard of cleaning and hygiene in the home.

They also told us they were involved in decisions about their needs and were able to express their views and talk about the care and support they needed, were treated as an individual and their privacy and dignity were respected at all times.

None of the residents we spoke to expressed any dissatisfaction regarding any outcome area.