• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Archived: Allied Healthcare Hornchurch

Top Floor 227, 106a North Street, Hornchurch, Essex, RM11 1SU (01708) 478712

Provided and run by:
Nestor Primecare Services Limited

Important: This service is now registered at a different address - see new profile

All Inspections

10 April 2014

During a routine inspection

We considered all the evidence we had gathered under the outcomes we inspected. We used the information to answer the five questions we always ask;

' Is the service caring?

' Is the service responsive?

' Is the service safe?

' Is the service effective?

' Is the service well led?

This is a summary of what we found.

Is the service safe?

People told us they felt safe. Safeguarding procedures were in place and staff understood how to safeguard people they supported. People told us that they felt their rights and dignity were respected. Systems were in place to make sure that managers and staff learnt from events such as whistleblowing and safeguarding investigations. This reduced the risks to people and helped the service to continually improve. Appropriate risk assessments were in place and staff knew about risk management strategies such how to prevent falls in order to provide safe care to people. Recruitment practice was thorough so that people were cared for by staff who were fit and competent. Policies and procedures were in place to make sure that unsafe practice was identified and people were protected.

Is the service effective?

People's care needs were assessed with them and they were involved in developing their plans of care. People said that their care plans were up to date and reflected their current needs. People were not put at unnecessary risk but also had access to choice and remained in control of decisions about their care and lives. We spoke with four people using the service and asked them for their views about the care and support they received. They were positive about their experiences and described care staff as "very good" and "polite and respectful." Relatives told us "the agency is brilliant, it is brilliant for people with dementia. The carers know how to respond to my mother, they reassure her and explain what they are doing." Another said "I was very sceptical about using agencies for my mother but I am very pleased with this one."

Is the service caring?

We spoke with people being supported by the service. We asked them for their opinion about the staff that supported them. People told us that the care staff were kind and caring and had enough time to deliver the planned care. One person said, " the care staff are nice, they look after me and listen to me." People's preferences and diverse needs were recorded and care and support had been provided in accordance with their wishes.

Is the service responsive?

Care staff we spoke to were knowledgeable about the needs of people they supported and how to meet them. Care staff told us that if they identified that people's needs had changed, they would report this to the office and the supervisor would re-assess the person's needs and update their care plan and risk assessments.This meant that the planning and delivery of care was flexible and kept up to date in recognition of people's changing needs.

Is the service well-led?

The service had a quality assurance process. Sufficient systems were in pace to monitor the quality of the service provided to ensure that people received safe, quality care. Annual customer satisfaction questionnaires were sent to people, their representatives and staff to seek their views and opinion about the service in order to understand where improvements were needed. Staff told us they were clear about their roles and responsibilities. They were supported by the management team to provide good, quality care and were encouraged to complete relevant training which enabled them to carry out their roles effectively. This helped to ensure that people received a good quality service at all times.

People knew how to make a complaint if they were unhappy. One person said that they had made a complaint and were satisfied with the outcome. People told us that they did not have any concerns but were confident that the office staff and manager would resolve any issues raised. One person who used the service said 'If I had a complaint I would go to the manager, I am sure she would sort it out." Another told us " Yes I know who to go to if I had a problem." People also told us that they were regularly contacted by the service to check if they were satisfied with the care that they received and were always asked if they had any concerns.

9 April 2013

During a routine inspection

People told us that staff had a good understanding of how to meet their needs. One person said of their carers "they are very efficient." People told us that they usually had the same regular carers, which they valued, and that staff were generally punctual. We found that care plans and risk assessments were in place which set out how to meet people's needs. People told us that they thought staff had the skills to support them. One person said "they know what they are doing." We found staff received support to do their job in the form of training and one to one supervision.

People told us the service asked for their views about the care provided. When asked if senior staff consulted them, one person said "yes, I have spoken to them once or twice." We found various systems in place for monitoring the quality of support provided. The service had a complaints procedure in place, and we found that complaints had been investigated in line with the procedure. We found that records were stored securely and kept up to date.

31 May 2011

During a routine inspection

People told us that they contributed to their plan of care and that they received a visit every couple of years to review this.

People said they were happy with their particular workers and felt they did their job very well.

We were told that until a couple of months ago, there had been problems with timekeeping, carers were either late or not turning up at all. People said carers were now on time and where needed, would arrange beforehand any changes to visits.

One family member told us that their relative had received poor care, which was formally investigated by the agency.

People said they did not remember if they had been given a formal complaints procedure but felt they would be able to make a compliant if this was necessary.

We spoke to one person who had been unhappy with the care provided to their relative. They had made a formal complaint which had been fully investigated but did not follow the complaints procedure expected timescales for a response.