• Care Home
  • Care home

Compassionate Lodge

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

177a, Uttoxeter Road, Draycott, Stoke-on-trent, ST11 9AB (01782) 970812

Provided and run by:
Compassionate Healthcare Limited

Important:

We served 2 warning notices on Compassionate Healthcare Limited on 30 June 2026 for failing to ensure the environmental safety was maintained and failing to ensure safe governance of Compassionate Lodge. 

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Our current view of the service

Requires improvement

Updated 12 June 2026

Date of assessment: 15 June to 14 July 2026. Compassionate Lodge is a care home providing residential care to adults of all ages including, people who misuse drugs and alcohol, people with an eating disorder, autistic people or people with learning disabilities, people with mental health conditions, physical disabilities and sensory impairments. The inspection was undertaken to provide the service with its first rating.

 

We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

 

The provider did not always identify and manage environmental risks effectively, which placed people at risk of harm and lessons had not always been learned from past incidents. There were enough trained staff to meet people's needs. Medicines were managed safely. People, relatives, staff and professionals all spoke positively about the service's approach to raising concerns and keeping people safe.

 

People's needs were regularly assessed and reviewed and care was person-centred. Staff understood people's needs and were kept up to date on any changes. The provider worked collaboratively with others. Staff supported people holistically, respecting their choices. Mental capacity assessments were completed when required.

 

People had detailed, individualised care plans and staff understood people well. Staff promoted people’s independence and encouraged them to participate in meaningful activities.

 

People were involved in decisions about their care. Staff worked effectively with people, relatives and professionals to deliver coordinated, responsive care. Feedback was encouraged, and people’s preferences and future wishes were respected, promoting choice, continuity and positive outcomes.

 

Governance and oversight systems were not always effective in identifying and addressing environmental safety risks or ensuring learning from incidents was fully embedded. While the provider took prompt action when concerns were highlighted, improvements were needed to strengthen quality assurance processes and ensure risks were consistently identified, managed and learned from. Management was approachable and promoted a positive, inclusive and person-centred culture. Staff, people and relatives felt listened to and valued.

 

We have found breaches of regulation at the service relating to safe care and treatment and good governance. In instances where CQC have decided to take civil or criminal enforcement action against a provider, we will publish this information on our website after any representations and / or appeals have been concluded.

People's experience of the service

Updated 12 June 2026

 

We spoke with people living at the home and their relatives to gather feedback about their experiences of care and support.

 

Feedback was generally positive. People told us they were happy living at the service and felt supported by staff. One person described the service as a "good place" and said they received "good support". They told us staff were "brilliant" and said they were "treated fairly".

 

Relatives also spoke positively about the service and the staff team. Comments included staff being "kind and respectful" and "welcoming of relatives". Relatives told us they felt people received the support they needed and were kept informed about important changes. They felt care was well managed and people's independence was encouraged.

 

People told us staff supported them with preparing meals and accessing food and drinks of their choice. Relatives felt staff knew people well and understood their individual needs and preferences.

 

Whilst feedback was largely positive, some concerns were raised regarding opportunities for one person to access the community and make choices about how they spent their time. We shared these concerns with the provider who was already aware of these concerns and had already taken and continued to take appropriate actions to support this person. Further information can be found within the relevant sections of this report.

 

One relative commented on the sparsity of the home environment and felt more activities could be available. People's views and experiences of activities and engagement varied.

 

While people we spoke to expressed that they were generally happy with their care, our assessment found some elements of care did not meet the expected standards.