• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Crossroads Care East Midlands - Nottingham Office Also known as TuVida

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

19 Pelham Road, Sherwood, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 1AP 07496 778701

Provided and run by:
East Midlands Crossroads-Caring For Carers

All Inspections

6 July 2023

During a monthly review of our data

We carried out a review of the data available to us about Crossroads Care East Midlands - Nottingham Office on 6 July 2023. We have not found evidence that we need to carry out an inspection or reassess our rating at this stage.

This could change at any time if we receive new information. We will continue to monitor data about this service.

If you have concerns about Crossroads Care East Midlands - Nottingham Office, you can give feedback on this service.

5 December 2019

During a routine inspection

Crossroad East Midlands – Nottingham Office is a service providing personal care to people living in their own homes. It provides long term, short term, palliative and respite to people within the community. At the time of our inspection, the service support a total number of 344 people.

Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive personal care. This is help with tasks related to personal hygiene and eating. Where they do we also consider any wider social care provided.

People’s experience of using this service and what we found

The care and support people received was safe. Staff had good knowledge of how to apply the provider’s safeguarding protocols. Risks management practices were safe and encouraged people to be as independent as possible. Medicines were managed well and people were protected from the risk of contracting or spreading infection.

Staff had the skills and experience they required to care for people effectively. They supported people to have consistent support with their health needs. Where required, they supported people to eat and drink well.

People were supported to have maximum choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests; the policies and systems in the service supported this practice.

Staff were kind and compassionate. They treated people with dignity and respect, and supported them to be involved in decisions about their care. The service promoted people’s independence and supported people to develop or maintain relevant skills where possible.

Care plans were comprehensive and provided guidance to staff on how to provide support which met people’s individual needs. Staff supported people to maintain relationships that were important to them. They supported people to access social and educational opportunities. The service responded to complaints they received in a timely manner.

Staff were supported to fulfil the responsibilities of their role. The registered manager maintained good oversight of the service. The provider had systems in place to monitor the quality of care people received.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk

Rating at last inspection

The last rating for this service was Good (published 12 May 2017)

Why we inspected

This was a planned inspection based on the previous rating.

Follow up

We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service until we return to visit as per our re-inspection programme. If we receive any concerning information we may inspect sooner.

5 January 2017

During a routine inspection

We carried out an announced inspection of the service on 5 January 2017

Crossroads Care East Midlands - Nottingham provides personal care and support to people living in their own homes. There were 395 people receiving care at the time of our visit.

There was a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC). A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

People told us they felt safe when staff supported them within their home. People were supported by staff who could identify the different types of abuse and who to report concerns to. Assessments of the risks to people’s safety were in place and regularly reviewed.

There were sufficient numbers of suitably qualified and experienced staff in place to keep people safe. Safe recruitment processes were in place.

People were protected from the risks associated with managing medicines. There were processes in place to ensure medicines were handled and administered safely.

Staff were received sufficient training, regular supervision and felt supported by the management team. The principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) were considered when supporting people. People were supported and encouraged to follow a healthy and balanced diet. People’s day to day health needs were met effectively by the staff.

People and their families had a good relationship with the staff that cared and supported them. People were treated with respect and dignity. People were involved with decisions made about their care and support. Information was available for people if they wished to speak with an independent advocate. People were supported to live as independently as possible.

People knew how to raise concerns or complaints and were encouraged to do so if needed. The provider followed their procedures to ensure any complaints or concerns were dealt with in a timely manner.

Staff spoke highly of the registered manager and the service provided. A number of systems were in place that enabled people, staff and relatives to give their views about the service. Robust quality assurance processes were in place.

23 July 2014

During a routine inspection

We carried out this inspection under section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider is meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

Crossroads Care East Midlands provides personal care and support to people in the Nottingham, Derby and Chesterfield areas. The office is located in Nottingham and was registered with CQC in December 2010. At our previous inspection in September 2013 the provider was not meeting the requirements of the law in relation to complaints. Following that inspection the provider sent us an action plan to tell us the improvements they were going to make. During this inspection we looked to see if these improvements had been made.

On the day of our inspection Crossroads Care East Midlands was providing care to 499 people. There was a registered manager in post at the time of our inspection. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manager the service and shares the legal responsibility for meeting the requirements of the law with the provider.

All the people we spoke with told us they felt safe with the people who cared for them and the care they received in their own homes. The provider had suitable arrangements in place to ensure people who used the service were safeguarded against the risk of abuse.

Appropriate risk assessments had been undertaken to make sure the environment was safe and secure for staff to attend to people’s needs.

People were supported by appropriately skilled and trained staff because the provider had a robust recruitment process in place. We saw records that showed there was sufficient numbers of staff to cover calls in an effective and caring way. The manager told us they were recruiting at the time of our visit.

People were supported to make informed choices and staff had awareness of the Mental Capacity (MCA) Act 2005, The Mental Capacity Act 2005 is designed to protect people who do not have the capacity to make certain important decisions for themselves, because they may lack the capacity to make such decisions due to permanent or temporary problems such as mental illness, brain injury or learning disability. If people lack capacity to make a decision for themselves, staff can make a decision about what is in their best interest once an appropriate assessment had taken place. We found that the MCA was being adhered to.

Care plans were person centred and we saw people and their families were involved with reviews and updates regarding their care needs.

We saw appropriate assessments took place before people used the service to ensure the service

provided could meet their needs.

People received relevant information on how the service was run. We saw documented evidence that showed people who used the service could express their views by completing a service questionnaire. We saw a copy of the quality survey for 2013 and 2014. We found the comments were mainly positive.

Staff were able to describe how they had responded to what was important to individuals who use the service. People we spoke with told us if they wanted to raise any concerns they knew who they should contact.

The provider had arrangements in place to ensure people could use an advocacy service. Advocates are trained professionals who support, enable and empower people to speak up.

There were systems in place to monitor and improve the quality of the service provided. The provider had a team in place that were responsible for undertaking monthly audits for care plans, running records, medication administration records and call monitoring systems to ensure all call are undertaken in a timely manner.

10, 11 September 2013

During a routine inspection

We received 21 survey responses from people who were using the service. The survey responses indicated that people were happy with the care and support they received. People felt that the care met their needs and that staff had a good understanding of their care needs.

The staff we spoke with were able to clearly describe the support that different people needed in order to take their medication. This information matched with the information in their care plan.

The staff we spoke with told us they felt the amount of time they had with each person using the service was sufficient. Staff said they would mention it to a manager if they felt the time allotted was not enough. Staff also said they were given sufficient time to travel from one house to the next.

The people we spoke with indicated that they had received a survey from the provider asking for their opinion of the service they received. We saw evidence that the survey results were analysed to provide an overall picture of satisfaction. The survey results for the 2012 and 2013 period indicated there were high levels of satisfaction with the service. There was a complaints procedure in place but it was not fully effective.

15 February 2013

During a routine inspection

We spoke to three individuals who use the service as personal care recipients or as carers of people who receive personal care.

People told us that they are happy with the service provided. One person told us that the care staff 'are very good time keepers.' Another told us that the 'care standard is excellent.' One carer supported via the provision of respite breaks told us we 'would be right in the muck without them.'

People we spoke to told us that they felt safe with provider staff. One individual who has used the service for a number of years told us 'I could trust them with anything.'

We found evidence of skilled effective care planning and delivery where the views of individuals receiving the service were sought and valued. We found evidence of an organisation which promotes learning and quality improvement. We found evidence of staff who are well supported, trained and motivated to provide person centred care.

You can see our judgements on the front page of this report.